View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 4:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Thanks for these links Sichko - I've just found another 50mm to track down for my stable!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
bawang
Joined: 26 Mar 2008 Posts: 548 Location: Indiana, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bawang wrote:
Thanks Sichko.
And just to add to the information, here is a link from past posts that mentions the top lens portion of RF 50 when is actually M42. I wonder if this can focus to infinity.
http://forum.mflenses.com/industar-50-3-5-50-m39-mount-for-rangefinder-cameras-t6531,highlight,industar.html
I am still waiting for comments on image quality between the two, anyone?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Thanks for the link. The thread is dated a couple of months before I joined the forum. I'm sure that there are lots of other hidden "gems" - waiting to be discovered. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Sorry, I am late.
Yes, indeed. The 50 has an M39-mount (M39SLR) and works perfectly on an EOS-SLR (you just won't get the last bit to infinity, but it focusses far enough), the 50-2 is the "newer" model and has an M42-mount. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Thanks Sichko. Rino. _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
Shrek wrote: |
OK, I couldn't resist! It's such a cute little thing! I won the first one I went for this morning, attached to a Zenit E |
Hey Shrek! GREAT move!
But....a cute little thing?.... Just watch it kick ass!
I'm waiting!
And, I'll have to repeat myself here: I've had photo buffs tell me that it's a "piece of xxxx and ugly to boot"...but all we have to do is produce fine images from the fine glass. Sure, it looks like someone took a saw and cut a "normal" lens in half.... _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Thu Jan 15, 2009 11:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
Laurence wrote: |
Shrek wrote: |
OK, I couldn't resist! It's such a cute little thing! I won the first one I went for this morning, attached to a Zenit E |
Hey Shrek! GREAT move!
But....a cute little thing?.... Just watch it kick ass!
I'm waiting!
And, I'll have to repeat myself here: I've had photo buffs tell me that it's a "piece of xxxx and ugly to boot"...but all we have to do is produce fine images from the fine glass. Sure, it looks like someone took a saw and cut a "normal" lens in half.... |
It was only £5.00 and covered in dirt, but it cleaned up beautifully Can't wait to show this thing off, should be great fun!!! _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
How does the Industar-61 L/Z MC M42 Zenit lens fit in?
as its another 50mm at f2.8 with the KMZ logo. _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
How does the Industar-61 L/Z MC M42 Zenit lens fit in?
as its another 50mm at f2.8 with the KMZ logo. |
To my knowledge, the Industar-61 (M42) is based on the Industar-61 rangefinder lens (design) and is a completely different lens, since it is much bigger than the 50-2 and offers some astounding macro cpabilities. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Fri Jan 16, 2009 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
How does the Industar-61 L/Z MC M42 Zenit lens fit in?
as its another 50mm at f2.8 with the KMZ logo. |
I think that you need a real Russian lens historian. I must preface anything I say with "AFAIK".
The Industar 50 (-2), along with the Helios 44(-2) was used as the normal "kit" lens for the Zenit SLR cameras. The Industar 61 L/Z (M42 45.5 mm register) appears to be a development of the Industar 61 L/D which was designed for the FED rangefinder camera. The L/D has 39 mm screw fit with a Leica register. I have not seen pictures of an M39 SLR (Zenit) lens although I have seen reference to one.
The "L" stands for Lanthanum one of the metallic elements used in the glass formulation. There is much discussion as to whether or not it is radioactive - and, if so, to what extent.
The 61 L/Z appears to use coated glass although it is not labelled as such. There is a multicoated version (MC).
The lens is sometimes described as a "macro" lens although "close focus" might be better. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Industar 50-2 50/3.5
+ 3 complete sets of extension rings, f/9
CPU Core 2 Duo socket M - pins are less than 2 mm long
_________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kansalliskala
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 5044 Location: Southern Finland countryside
Expire: 2016-12-30
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskala wrote:
+ 500 watts of halogen?
flash? how did you get so beautiful light and colors? _________________ MF: Kodak DCS SLR/c; Samsung NX10; OM-10; Canon T50
Zuiko 28/3.5, Distagon 35/2.8; Yashica ML 50/2;
Zuiko 50/1.4; S-M-C 120/2.8; Zuiko 135/3.5; 200/5;
Tamron AD1 135/2.8, Soligor 180/3.5; Tamron AD1 300/5.6
Tamron zooms: 01A, Z-210
Yashicaflex C; Київ 4 + Юпитер 8, 11; Polaroid 100; Olympus XA; Yashica T3
Museum stuff: Certo-Phot; Tele-Edixon 135; Polaris 90-190; Asahi Bellows; Ixus IIs
Projects: Agfa Isolette III (no shutter), Canon AE-1D (no sensor),
Nikon D80 (dead), The "Peace Camera"
AF: Canon, Tokina, Sigma Video: JVC GZ-MG275E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Sun Jan 18, 2009 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Only scattered light from window And 2.5s exposure. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sirslak
Joined: 05 Aug 2008 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sirslak wrote:
Just got myself another bargain, € 10,- for an olympic Zenit E with Industar 50-2 lens. After reading this thread I am so anxious to try it out, I hope I receive it tomorrow!
Can anybody tell me how many aperture blades there are in this little thing? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
GrahamNR17
Joined: 17 Jan 2009 Posts: 1855 Location: Norfolk, UK
Expire: 2012-09-06
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 12:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamNR17 wrote:
sirslak wrote: |
Just got myself another bargain, € 10,- for an olympic Zenit E with Industar 50-2 lens. After reading this thread I am so anxious to try it out, I hope I receive it tomorrow!
Can anybody tell me how many aperture blades there are in this little thing? |
My example appears to be seven blades.
Enjoy your lens, I think it will constantly surprise you and you will never regret that €10 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
I had two of them, both had 7 blades, rounded, so f/3.5-f5.6 is almost round. _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
I was about to buy myself one of those tiny Industars, but yesterday I was going through my collection and sure enough... I found a near mint copy on a Revueflex E in one of my forgotten boxes. As if that wasn't enough I also discovered the silver version in the same box (however that one is not in a great shape and frozen completely). _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
YureW
Joined: 12 Feb 2009 Posts: 45 Location: Trieste, Italy
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
YureW wrote:
I have an Industar 50/3.5, not Industar-2, black version and M39 thread, and I find it great for freehand macros.
Here is a sample:
Canon EOS 30D, ISO 250, 1/250s (manual mode), built in flash used.
Industar 50/3.5 @ f/8 (or something)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Helios
Joined: 05 Jan 2008 Posts: 537 Location: East of France
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Helios wrote:
Really , Elmar four elements formula lenses are ideal for macrophoto ... I'd to try soon ! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
estudleon
Joined: 15 May 2008 Posts: 3754 Location: Argentina
|
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
estudleon wrote:
Helios wrote: |
Really , Elmar four elements formula lenses are ideal for macrophoto ... I'd to try soon ! |
Yes, for long time LEICA had the Elmar 60 mm. for macro.
A lot of macro lenses use the xenotar 5 element schame, similar to rolleiflex 6x6 xenotar.
Rino _________________ Konica 2,8/100
CZJ: 4/20, 2,4/35, 1,8/50 aus jena, 3,5/135MC, Pentacon 1,8/50
Pentax S-M-C-1,4/50
Helios 44-3
Mamiya 2,8/135
Misc. : jupiter 9
Stuff used:
A) SRL
Alpa 10 D - kern macro Switar 1,9/50 -black, Kilffit apochromat 2/100.
Asahi pentax spotmatic super takumar 1,4/50
Contaflex super B tessar 2,8/50 Pro-tessar 115
Leica R3 electronic summicron 2/50 elmarit 2,8/35
Konica Autoreflex 3 (2 black and chrome one), TC, T4. 2,8/24, 3,5/28 not MC and MC, 1,8/40, 1,4/50, 1,7/50 MC and not MC, 1,8/85, 3,2/135, 3,5/135, 4/200
Minolta XG9 2,8/35, 2/45, 3,5/135
Nikkormat FTn 1,4/50, 2,8/135
Fujica ST 801, 605, 705n. 3,5/19, 1,4/50, 1,8/55, 4/85, 3,5/135.
Praktica MTL 5 and a lot of M42 lenses.
Voigtlander. Bessamatic m, bessamatix de luxe, bessamatic cs, ultramatic and ultramatic cs.
Skoparex 3,5/35, skopagon 2/40, skopar 2,8/50, skopar X 2,8/50, super lanthar (out of catalogue) 2,8/50, dinarex 3,4/90, dinarex 4,8/100, super dinarex 4/135, super dinarex 4/200, zoomar 2,8/36-83, portrait lens 0, 1 and 2. Curtagon 4/28 and 2,8/35
Canon AV1, 1,8/50
Rolleiflex SL35 and SL35 E. 2,8/35 angulon, 2,8/35 distagon, 1,4/55 rolleinar, 1,8/50 planar, 4/135 tessar, 2,8/135 rolleinar, x2 rollei, M42 to rollei adap.
Etc.
RF
Yashica Minister III
Voightlander Vito, vitomatic I, Vito C, etc.
Leica M. M2, M3 (d.s.) and M4. Schenider 3,4/21, 2/35 summaron 2,8/35 (with eyes). Summicron 2/35 (8 elements with eyes), 2/35 chrome, 2/35 black, 1,4/35 pre asph and aspheric - old -, 2/40 summicron, 2,8/50 elmar, 2/50 7 elements, 2/50 DR, 2/50 - minolta version, 1,4/50 summilux 1966 version, 1,4/75 summilux, 2/90 large version, 2/90 reduced version of 1987, 2,8/90 elmarit large version, 4/135 elmar. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
my_photography
Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Is the M39 50 a macro only lens in DSLR or can it also be a normal 50mm lens?
Any advantage of having M39 version instead of M42 and vice versa? _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
Posted: Tue May 12, 2009 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
my_photography wrote: |
Is the M39 50 a macro only lens in DSLR or can it also be a normal 50mm lens?
Any advantage of having M39 version instead of M42 and vice versa? |
Depends on which kind of M39. If you're talking about a LTM, then yes, it can only be used for macro. But, M39 lenses made for SLRs (Zenit, specifically) have near identical register as M42 lenses (with differing reports, but the only M39 lens I have, Helios-44, does infinity fine on my K20D), so you can use it as a normal lens, with an M39-M42 adapter ring.
I can't see any merit of having M39 over M42, except for being able to use it on M39 Zenits. I bought my Helios-44 not because I wanted the M39 or I wanted to use it with a Zenit (although I am, since the lens came with the camera ), but because that was the only version that has 13-bladed aperture. _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|