View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 3:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you so much, fellows, for your tremendous inputs! I read your stories and tips with quite an emotion. First, I've got at which amateur level I find myself with my spontaneously assembled and so spontaneously used set of lenses. Some of you speak from a perspective of persons who tried hundreds of lenses before you started feeling what matches your taste and purposes the most. My experience is not as wide, so do I need to buy more lenses to feel myself easier to say goodbye to most of them? Probalby yes. Then, I much appreciated your tips to focus on something more special in order to chose better. This is a very godd idea. In fact, I was trying many cheao lenses for curiosity. Some of them revealed themselves great, like Jupiter-8, some give more fun, like for example my short-time love story with Pentaflex 2.8/50 (aka Domiplan) with edge defects giving an image like in 3D toy projectors from childhood. I was tending to acquire not expensive. Sometimes I ran into nice bagains, like Heliar 4.5/12cm way below its market price, sometimes it made me discover real gems among standard lenses, like Rollei Planar 1.8/50. But in most cases I stocked a set of lenses that have no great value, at least not in terms of investment or reselling. So, maybe I need to pass to another category of acquisitions, rarer or more expensive (as well as to buy less often) in order to see my whole lens set in a more carefree way.
One of the most interesting threads in the last weeks, IMHO. Thank you again! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
alex ph wrote: |
so do I need to buy more lenses to feel myself easier to say goodbye to most of them? Probalby yes. |
More likely: no
I think your question is more about avoiding a collection consisting mostly of, let's say "meh-lenses" (lenses that leave you indifferent or that you dislike).
A good way to (partly) avoid purchasing these is to do some research up front. Will the specific character of the lens really add something to your collection? Will it really deliver something that none of your other lenses already deliver?
There will always be a chance that the copy you receive is not as good as average, or maybe the character is in the end not exactly a match for you eventually. But stopping with impulse-purchases greatly diminishes the chance of "meh-purchases". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Selling is harder than buying.
More work.
The root of the problem.
Damn you ebay! _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7584 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Selling is harder than buying.
More work.
The root of the problem.
Damn you ebay! |
Fully agree! _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11061 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Well curiosity drove me to want to try many different lenses, quality concerns came later. I wanted to see for myself, to look through many lenses, to get practical experience, spend some lab time so to speak. I wasn't going to get that by buying Canon L lenses! Although if money were not any concern I would have satisfied my curiosity that way! lol _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bychance
Joined: 24 Apr 2013 Posts: 347 Location: Kent, England
|
Posted: Sun Jan 21, 2018 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
bychance wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
Selling is harder than buying.
More work.
The root of the problem.
Damn you ebay! |
Nothing like a steady 5% by volume indulgence and a contented eBay browse to plug an imagined hole in a lens collection
The good ship 'Fxxk it'..'
God bless all who fail in her... _________________ I got where I am by avoiding where I was going.
Now where was I? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Mon Jan 22, 2018 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
My efforts to reduce my collection have just taken a significant set-back
I've won an auction for a job lot of 15-20 assorted lenses.
Hopefully most will be in acceptable condition (at least the Tamron 54B I spotted among them)
From the research I've done on sold listings I should be able to make my money back, as long as can manage to sell the ones I don't want. Trouble is listing them on e-bay usually proves too much effort
Update:
I collected my lenses last night. Turned out to be 21 of them, mostly of minimal value & with traces of fungus on close inspection, though pretty much all seem quite usable.
As well as the 54B (300mm macro prime) I had my eye on there was also a Nikon fit Sigma 180mm macro which I expect to find a use for.
I now have to add adapters for MD & FD mounts to my collection, to try them out before trying to treat the fungus on them. - THIS DOESN'T HELP ME REDUCE!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|