View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
I don't really know how good the CZJ P6 80/2.8 is. I didn't read much positive things about it.
If you get a Mamiya 645 adapter you get access to the superb 120/4 macro. But there is also a CZJ 120/2.8 macro, but that will be a heavy lens.
Some nice images from the Mamiya 80/2.8: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/882423/19#8618598 |
Aham keep continue your research they are great lenses. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
apaddy
Joined: 13 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
apaddy wrote:
Attila wrote: |
AhamB wrote: |
I don't really know how good the CZJ P6 80/2.8 is. I didn't read much positive things about it.
If you get a Mamiya 645 adapter you get access to the superb 120/4 macro. But there is also a CZJ 120/2.8 macro, but that will be a heavy lens.
Some nice images from the Mamiya 80/2.8: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/882423/19#8618598 |
Aham keep continue your research they are great lenses. |
Yes it is very beautiful.so I decide buy it _________________ Canon EOS 350D EF28-135 IS USM
CZJ 35/2.8
IBM X40(2371)
Nokia E71+Ericsson T39
Mobile:(+86)13823596728 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009 Posts: 894
|
Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
Hello, I am inclined more for the 80/2.8 CZJ P6 instead of mamiya. Undoubtedly.
All these photos were taken with Biomet, a Canon 5D.
Greetings, and my English is also bad.
Here, more samples
http://forum.mflenses.com/ecological-reserve-in-buenos-aires-downtown-t26603.html _________________ Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Mon Jul 19, 2010 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
francotirador wrote: |
Hello, I am inclined more for the 80/2.8 CZJ P6 instead of mamiya. Undoubtedly. |
Looking at that bokeh, I am definitely not! Horrible bright ring bokeh (and swirl). My research is done, Atilla.
Of course some people will like it (sometimes I like the swirl from my Pancolar 50/1.8 ) but it does make the lens less versatile, especially the harsh bokeh. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apaddy
Joined: 13 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
apaddy wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
francotirador wrote: |
Hello, I am inclined more for the 80/2.8 CZJ P6 instead of mamiya. Undoubtedly. |
Looking at that bokeh, I am definitely not! Horrible bright ring bokeh (and swirl). My research is done, Atilla.
Of course some people will like it (sometimes I like the swirl from my Pancolar 50/1.8 ) but it does make the lens less versatile, especially the harsh bokeh. |
Might the Mamiya is more brightily.and the Mamiya 80/2.8 the color is more true than the Carl Zeiss?Am i Right? _________________ Canon EOS 350D EF28-135 IS USM
CZJ 35/2.8
IBM X40(2371)
Nokia E71+Ericsson T39
Mobile:(+86)13823596728 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AhamB
Joined: 22 Jun 2008 Posts: 733 Location: Germany
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
AhamB wrote:
apaddy wrote: |
Might the Mamiya is more brightily.and the Mamiya 80/2.8 the color is more true than the Carl Zeiss?Am i Right? |
The color and contrast look OK for me on the second picture, but that first one with the red flower looks like it was taken on film (very grainy and white balance is off). I think the biggest difference is in the bokeh, which is much smoother on the Mamiya. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
apaddy
Joined: 13 Jul 2010 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
apaddy wrote:
AhamB wrote: |
apaddy wrote: |
Might the Mamiya is more brightily.and the Mamiya 80/2.8 the color is more true than the Carl Zeiss?Am i Right? |
The color and contrast look OK for me on the second picture, but that first one with the red flower looks like it was taken on film (very grainy and white balance is off). I think the biggest difference is in the bokeh, which is much smoother on the Mamiya. |
Thanks a lot!
I had paid for the Mamiya 80/2.8,then the lens send to me .i'll bring it to go buy the Adapter.It's better for fix it.. _________________ Canon EOS 350D EF28-135 IS USM
CZJ 35/2.8
IBM X40(2371)
Nokia E71+Ericsson T39
Mobile:(+86)13823596728 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|