Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Hexanon 52/1.8 upon Samsung NX10
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Jul 19, 2014 8:45 pm    Post subject: Hexanon 52/1.8 upon Samsung NX10 Reply with quote



PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 6:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



Der Untergang des Abendlandes


Smile

F 2.8


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 6:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



f 1.8


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 6:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lovely shots Alex from this humble (and cheap) Hexanon. Smile

I love Hexanon lenses but this one is usually passed by as its not as sharp as its 1.7/50 cousin. But for portraits, the 52mm has the advantage.


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 7:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigiChromeEd wrote:
Lovely shots Alex from this humble (and cheap) Hexanon. Smile

is usually passed by as its not as sharp as its 1.7/50 cousin. .


To say frankly, my personal experience with several samples of both kinds left me in the completely opposite opinion.


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 7:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Lovely shots Alex from this humble (and cheap) Hexanon. Smile

is usually passed by as its not as sharp as its 1.7/50 cousin. .


To say frankly, my personal experience with several samples of both kinds left me in the completely opposite opinion.


That's interesting, as the 1.7/50 is supposed to be one of the sharpest 50's out there. Judging by your shots, I must use my 52mm more often. Smile


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigiChromeEd wrote:
is supposed to be


Do the comparison, and form your own opinion. Very Happy


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

LittleAlex wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote:
is supposed to be


Do the comparison, and form your own opinion. Very Happy


I would if I had a 1.7/50.


PostPosted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="DigiChromeEd"]
LittleAlex wrote:
if I had a 1.7/50.


Then don’t be sorry for its absence. Smile


PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree with Alex; the 52/1.8 is (at least) as sharp as the 50/1.7. It also has smoother bokeh than the 1.7.
I owned both of them (sold the 1.7 as it costs more, the 52/1.8 is hard to sell) and shot some boring A-B tests with them, wide open and at 5.6.
Here's one of the shots, click it to get to my flickr to see the others in full res:

Konica AR 52/1.8 @1.8 by scepticswe, on Flickr


PostPosted: Thu Aug 07, 2014 6:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

[quote="LittleAlex"]
DigiChromeEd wrote:
LittleAlex wrote:
if I had a 1.7/50.


Then don’t be sorry for its absence. Smile


I'm not, but it would be interesting to see a side by-side comparison nonetheless.