View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011 Posts: 983 Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 1:49 am Post subject: Help needed |
|
|
Mir wrote:
I was sort of inspired by a guy Michel Campeau. http://www.moisdelaphoto.com/campeau.html
I was trying to get monochrome, get grain and a vintage feel, while fooling around with a single low light...
I've cut them done from 45.... can't go any further... i don't know how they do it...
I know if i take a step back and come back to them later it'll get easier...
I just wanted to do an exercise : have an idea, set up, shoot and choose.... done...
Now, some of you are pros and others are very good shooters...
Choose one.... or two...
voice your critics, tips or anything else you have to say, i'd like to hear it
All shots from a RE, Auto-Topcor 2,8/35, heavily stoped down, high ISO, no PP,
straight Jpegs from my 6Mp Konica Minolta Maxxum 7D...
Thanks
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
#6
#7
#8
#9
#10
#11
#12
#13
_________________ "Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, 1.5/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7796 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I would choose number 5, probably the lightest of all the pictures. With the style I think you're aiming for, in a 'product shot' such as these, some edge definition is important. It's OK for some of the black of the camera to be indistiguishable from the black of the background, but not all of it. We need to be able to define the outline.
It's a style I like and one that I have tried. There's some examples of my attempts in my ipernity album 'Cameras & Lenses'.
http://www.ipernity.com/doc/294337/album/402477
Some of mine were taken using black velvet as the background, but the velvet was actually very shiny and it didn't quite have the effect I wanted, which is the same effect I think you're after. Whether mine work or not I'm not sure. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mir
Joined: 07 Feb 2011 Posts: 983 Location: Montreal, Canada
Expire: 2017-09-30
|
Posted: Mon Sep 23, 2013 3:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mir wrote:
Thanks Lloydy, your comments are very much appreciated.
I was aiming for something like your Rolleiflex SL-35.
I thought that with less light i would get a little less "product shot"... a little more "artistic"
But, insisting on working with only one light source, i would always loose the outline...
or else the middle of the camera would get to much light... i like less light....
My only problem with the black velvet is dust and other particules, they'll sometimes shine under the light...
The Zorki-4K i liked... if it filled the frame i would of loved it !
you can't fake it, the camera itself has "vintage" all over it ..... looks like it weighs 8 pounds !
Same for the KodakVest Pocket B, the black one...a bit bigger in the frame would of been it !
Next time i'll use another light and aim it towards the back of the camera....
Or one on each sides..
I guess your right... a bit more edge definition and i would of been happy with #5...
Thanks for time _________________ "Obsta principiis, finem respice"
"There is a fine line between hobby and mental illness"
MISC: Tamron SP 35-80 (01A), Auto Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90, Tamron SP 5,6/300 (54B)
ZEISS: WG Distagon 2.8/25, WG Distagon 2.8/35 HFT, WG Planar HFT 1.4/50, Ultron 1.8/50, WG Sonnar 2.8/85, WG Sonnar HFT 2.8/135
VOIGTLÄNDER : Ultron Aspherical 1.8/21, Ultron 2/28, Nokton Aspherical 1.2/35, Nokton Classic 1.4/40, Nokton 1.2/50, Nokton Aspherical 1.5/50, Color-Heliar 2.5/75
MINOLTA: MD 3.5/35-70 Macro, MD 1.2/50, MC Rokkor-X 1.2/58, MD Macro 3.5/50
LEITZ: SUMMICRON-R 2/35 (II), SUMMICRON-R 2/50 (II), TELE ELMARIT-M 2,8/90 (Thin)
CANON RF: 2.8/28, 2/35, 1.2/50, 1.4/50, 1.5/50, Serenar 1.8/50, 2/85, 2/100, 3.5/100
LTM : YASHICA YASHINON 1.8/5cm, FUJINON L 2/5cm, CHIYODA KOGAKU SUPER ROKKOR 1.8/5cm, CHIYOKO SUPER ROKKOR C 2/5cm, TOKYO KOGAKU Topcor-S 2/5cm, Nippon Kogaku NIKKOR-H.C 2/5cm, KMZ Jupiter-8 2/5cm
DKL : VOIGTLÄNDER SKOPAREX 3,4/35, SEPTON 2/50, DYNAREX 3,4/90, SUPER-DYNAREX 4/135, Scheiner-Kreuznach Retina-Xenon 1,9/50
And a small Minolta AF set: 2.8/20, 1.4/35, 1.4/50, 2/100, 4.5/100-200
@we3fotography
@7plus_pictures
@_whats.that.car_ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|