Posted: Sun May 16, 2021 11:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Glad you found that worth-while, fellows!
Jamaeolus, the lens looks precisely like Trylor in the post linked above, except the name on the beauty ring which says Kynor.
Making some more shots in the open air I found out a nice retro look the lens renders. I observe alongside a pretty subtle change of in-focus areas when changing the aperture value. You may distinguish wide open from f5.6 and even from f11 mostly by OOF fuzzyness. Some more examples follow.
#1 At f5.6, unprocessed besides resize
#2 At f5.6, autocontrast
#3 The same WO, unprocessed, just desaturated. A nice mild glow
#4 At f5.6, autocotrast and desaturated
#5 WO, autocontrast
#6 The same at f5.6, autocontrast. Not much difference in central sharpness, right?
#7 WO, autocontrast
#8 At f11, autocontrast
|