Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Fungus or Styrofoam Balls?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:10 am    Post subject: Fungus or Styrofoam Balls? Reply with quote

Look inside this lens. Laughing
Click here to see on Ebay


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ewwwwww! Embarassed Embarassed


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

No styrofoam Shocked


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I though you aren't going to buy new lenses Very Happy


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 8:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's a paint loss, so nothing to worry about.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Stefan is right, google "Schneideritis" (as that happened a lot with some Schneider lenses and for instance also the Minolta M 28mm lens)


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 10:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

std wrote:
That's a paint loss, so nothing to worry about.


In general you are right. But as it is very severe and on a fisheye (whose image extends to the very lens edge) it might degrade the image considerably in this particular case.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 11:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Save your money and buy a goldfish bowl instead Walter. Difficult to mount but far better IQ, and you get free fish pics thrown in.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 12:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Agreed, that fisheye is very early and actually crap. Had it once, regretted it.


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 6:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sevo wrote:
std wrote:
That's a paint loss, so nothing to worry about.


In general you are right. But as it is very severe and on a fisheye (whose image extends to the very lens edge) it might degrade the image considerably in this particular case.


I think as diaphragm is closed, less of front element circumference is used. Should be okay stopped down I think. In first photo looks like it is confined to outer circumferential regions, and reflections in subsequent photos.

I have a version if this lens, Soligor iirc. I was able to coax some decent images after set up & used according to the instruction booklet. (on my to-scan list, also to check how easy it is disassembled)


PostPosted: Tue Dec 06, 2011 7:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

std wrote:
That's a paint loss, so nothing to worry about.

+1