Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Fujinon . T 600mm f/5.6
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ForenSeil wrote:
@Ian
Processing lenses can be very nice "telescopes" but as far as I know many don't work nice at infinity in terms of resolution. For example my G-Claron was afwul at infinity and NEX-3.
Your Wollensak is above average for processing lenses I guess.


I think there must have been something wrong with your G-Claron as I have a dozen or more repro lenses and they all shoot fine at infinity. I have 9/150 and 9/210 G-Glarons and they are both very sharp at infinity, with the caveat that my Rodenstock APO-Gerogon 9/150 is slightly better.

Anyways, these lenses are often cheap enough to be worth a gamble.

This was with my Rodenstock Magnagon 5.6/75 which is also optimised for 1:1 like the G-Claron and APO-Gerogon, no lack of sharpness here, wide open:




This was with the APO-Gerogon 9/150 wide open:




PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 7:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Is purple fringing only produced when shooting digital? I've noticed that many telephoto type longer lenses suffer from it, whilst the simpler (and physically longer) lenses don't. I think this is the same point as made above about doublets.

BTW, I've just won a Tokina made 600/8 monster... I guess we'll soon find out!

BTW 2 Good work with the repro lenses! Think I'd prefer something simpler though Smile


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 8:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Purple fringing happens with film too, was noticed less because people were having small prints made and weren't able to examine the negatives in the detail we do today with pixel peeping.


PostPosted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 9:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That makes sense, thanks Ian.