Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2014 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
ForenSeil wrote: |
@Ian
Processing lenses can be very nice "telescopes" but as far as I know many don't work nice at infinity in terms of resolution. For example my G-Claron was afwul at infinity and NEX-3.
Your Wollensak is above average for processing lenses I guess. |
I think there must have been something wrong with your G-Claron as I have a dozen or more repro lenses and they all shoot fine at infinity. I have 9/150 and 9/210 G-Glarons and they are both very sharp at infinity, with the caveat that my Rodenstock APO-Gerogon 9/150 is slightly better.
Anyways, these lenses are often cheap enough to be worth a gamble.
This was with my Rodenstock Magnagon 5.6/75 which is also optimised for 1:1 like the G-Claron and APO-Gerogon, no lack of sharpness here, wide open:
This was with the APO-Gerogon 9/150 wide open:
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |