| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2011 2:18 am Post subject: Fotodiox MD EOS Glass Adapter |
 |
|
walter g wrote:
I just ordered it. I will review it after I recieve it.Their is no way I'm going to have the money for a Sony Nex or Panny G1 in the near future. 
So this will atleast let me use my Minolta lenses. 
Not a pefect solution but better then nothing.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
I received it yesterday but I didn't get home in time to shoot with it. Quality of construction is excellent, fit is pefect, and it even has the notches on the part you grip like the MD lenses have on their appeture ring.
Today was a littlle better but still got home late. 
Minolta MD 28 2.8 at f5.6 on Canon Eos 10D with glass adapter. More testing will hopefully be done tomorrow. 
Only PP was light level adjustments, no sharpening. If I was only 1/2 an hour earlier.
Please C/C. I need your opinions on what you think. Be honest.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 7788
Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Given the high contrast, and some glare off the front of the building, it doesn't look bad. Perhaps a bit soft ? but is that due to shake or other factors ?
I don't think it's bad, and I would certainly persevere with it. I'm actually very interested in getting the same adapter to use some MD lenses on a Canon EOS 600 film camera. Perhaps that's the best test, borrow a Canon film camera and do battle with your Minolta film camera ?
_________________
LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
I'm hoping to have time tomorrow for more test. Shot was handheld so camera shake is a possibility. I hadn't thought about a Canon EOS film camera. Thanks. I will keep an eyae out for one.
Crop of the last shot not resized, no sharpening.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Well the crop tells the story. It's absolute Crap. I will do a sharpness test tomorrow at lower ISO,tripod and better lighting conditions.
This was shot at f5.6 at ISO 400 which is the highest usable, barely, ISO on the 10D.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Couldn't wait until tomorrow. I still need to get out a tripod so this shot is handheld. Minolta MD 70-210 f4 at f11 10D with glass adapter. Minor PP with standard sharpening. Shot is cropped. Not to bad for handheld.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6950
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 12:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Shots look soft. Personally, I wouldn't be happy.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57865
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Almost any glass adapter what I seen was crap in longer distance shoot than one meter.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
I got mine from Big-Is - the results look just like yours Walter. It is pretty crappy but it's the only way of using Minolta lenses on a Canon. Stopping down helps a lot, at wide open it glows like sunlight on a foggy day. I also sometimes see a bright flare circle in the centre at certain angles, but not pointing directly towards the sun.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 7788
Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
I think it would be interesting to see this, and other, glassed adapters, tested back to back on film cameras where possible.
_________________
LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
| peterqd wrote: |
| I got mine from Big-Is - the results look just like yours Walter. It is pretty crappy but it's the only way of using Minolta lenses on a Canon. Stopping down helps a lot, at wide open it glows like sunlight on a foggy day. I also sometimes see a bright flare circle in the centre at certain angles, but not pointing directly towards the sun. |
Thanks, I agree it's crappy. It's still nice to use my lenses on digital, tho.
I will practice with it and try to learn to use it to it's best effect.
I didn't have the time I thought I would today, but I did get out my MD 50 f2 and tried a rose shot. Cropped and PP done.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
 Somehow my in camera settings were at 0. I'm not sure when it got changed. So I made a custom setting for this adapter, which to me is a little better. Probably the best I will get with an adapter.
New setting is Contrast +2, Sharpness +2, Satuation 0.
Anyway it dosen't change my opinion.
Please tell me what you think.
Orange Dahlia Minolta 50 f2 at f8
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
Now for a real test. Handheld, but I think it's pretty accurate.Test is at f8. Lens used is a Minolta MD 2/50.
First adapter is the JIAKGONG macro adapter, no glass.
Second adapter is the FOTODIOX adapter with glass. I used my smallest tube with it.
No Sharpening. Please tell me what you think.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 17633
Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 7:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
The Orange Dahlia looks really soft, or rather blurred. I guess at f/8 you had some camera shake there.
The bank note shows some deterioration but it's not too bad, really.
In my experience glass adapters (I have used CanonFD-EOS and NikonF-M42 with a corrective lens) do worsen IQ but the pictures are still usable and if that is the only way to used your beloved lenses on digital, don't worry to much about pixel peeping, better try to avoid flaring situations and enjoy your lenses!
_________________
Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator 
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
You can pixel peep the detail in close ups, but a glassless adapter could be used for those. More important for me is how well the adapter works for distance shots which are impossible without the glass. However, the detail looks fine for 9x6 prints, which is the biggest I ever make.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 10:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
I really don't think I can produce a usable image with this adapter past a couple feet. I understand the lower IQ but this is beyond that.
I wanted to take camera shake out of the equation, so I used a heavy duty tripod. The weather wasn't great today, but I worked with what I had.
I didn't plan this as a shootout so the shot with the macro adapter is handheld, so there could be a little camera shake.
Lens used is the Minolta 70-210 f4 at f8
Macro adapter shot no PP at all look at the detail, shot at 3 meters
Adapter with glass shot is at 30 meters this is a crop, shot is bracketed so I didn't miss focus, No detail, looks soft and fuzzy.
Either this adapter is defective or these adapters are a lot worse then I thought. 
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
They do look pretty awful Walter.
I took a pic of my Minolta 35-70 zoom for another thread and tried a little comparison experiment with my Big_Is MD>EOS adapter while I was about it. These pics are taken with the CZJ Flek 35 at f8 - on the left with the M42>MD adapter mounted onto the MD>EOS adapter and on the right with the lens mounted direct onto the 400D with the M42>EOS adapter.
 
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7555
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
In case any one need a thin glass-less adapter, please refer to this old thread http://forum.mflenses.com/thin-md-eos-adaptor-gum-rubber-film-adaptor-t38347.html
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
Sorry if this is makes you feel ill. I put my adapter to the infinity test yesterday with the MC 1.4/58 up front.
#1 @f1.4
#2 @f8
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
I don't think that adapter will work on a 10D because of the shape of the mirror box.
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010
Posts: 2463
Location: NC, USA
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 5:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
| peterqd wrote: |
Sorry if this is makes you feel ill. I put my adapter to the infinity test yesterday with the MC 1.4/58 up front.
#1 @f1.4
#2 @f8
|
 I don't know what else to say.Lucky I took a seasick pill before viewing the images. 
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7555
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| walter g wrote: |
I don't think that adapter will work on a 10D because of the shape of the mirror box. |
Just checked. The mirror box of 10D is the same as D30 and D60 so this adaptor will not work. 
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
peterqd
Joined: 28 Feb 2007
Posts: 7448
Location: near High Wycombe, UK
Expire: 2014-01-04
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterqd wrote:
| walter g wrote: |
| I don't know what else to say.Lucky I took a seasick pill before viewing the images. |
It was very cheap - more expensive ones are no doubt 100% better. I'm going to take the glass out and use it for close-ups only until I can afford a new digicam.
_________________
Peter - Moderator |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
