Posted: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Arctures wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
What am I missing here? That site lists the Helios 44-2 as 38/20 resolution. That doesn't sound so great to me. I have the lens and find it quite sharp. Additionally, the Jupiter 12 is 36/18. Real close to the Helios, but the numbers don't sound like they support people's opinions. I had expected 50-60 range numbers. |
Well as I can see my Mir-24N is much sharper than Helios-44-2 @f/2.0. But resolution is not everything about the lens. I do not take sometimes Planar 50/1.4 but do take Helios-44-2 instead because of colors and bokeh. _________________ Sony A7, NEX-5n, Panasonic GH5(Oly12-40/2., Contax Distagon T* 28/2.8, Contax Planar T* 50/1.4, Contax T* 80-200/4,
Minolta Rokkor MC 58/1.2, Minolta MC Rokkor-X PF 50/1.7, Minolta MD 50/2.0, Konica Hexanon AR 50/1.8,
Konica Hexanon 57/1.4, Rokkor-PF 55/1.7, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Auto Yashinon 50/2.0, Canon FD 50/3.5
Voigtl�nder APO Lanthar 90/3.5 M42, Topcon RE.Topcor 58/1.8, Helios-44-2 58/2.0, Canon FD 24/2.8,
Canon FD 135/2.5 SC, Auto Topcor 135/3.5, Pentax SMC 55/1.8, Minolta 35/2.8, Minolta MD 35-70/3.5 |