View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:55 am Post subject: First image with Kodak 2383 |
|
|
David wrote:
I picked up a 2,000-foot spool of Kodak 2383 for about $30 a few months back. I finally had time to spool a few rolls. Not knowing anything about it and finding very little on the Internet about how to shoot with it, I spooled a 10-shot roll and got bupkus shooting at 200 ISO. I did notice the very, very bright spots of the images left tiny dots on the negatives. So I spooled up 12 more shots and did an ISO test. I loaded in the the K2 I just got back from a CLA and began at ISO 8, skipping two notches then going to the next. By ISO 32, I wasn't getting anything on the negative. Even at ISO 8 this image is underexposed.
I also learned that this film is VERY sensitive to perforation surges. The first roll I developed had surge marks far worse than this, and I rotated it at a rate of 15 revolutions per minute for he first minute and the three revolutions per ten seconds for each one-minute agitation thereafter. This one I rotated at 12 RPM for he first minute and two revolutions in ten seconds each minute thereafter. Lighter surge marks, but not gone. This was developed in D-76 and fixed in new fixer.
This was shot in mid-day, no clouds. At ISO 100, f22, the meter read 1/60th or 1/125th. This was shot at ISO 8, f22, four seconds (I think the time on that is correct.)
_________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Does this link help?
http://motion.kodak.com/motion/Products/Distribution_And_Exhibition/2383.htm _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I get those stripes on my Vision2 film sometimes, the amount of agitation doesn't seem to make much difference is whether they appear or not, I'd love to know how to avoid them. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri Jun 29, 2012 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
Strange - those look like light leaks from the film perforations.
It is possible that the big roll was opened and partially exposed. _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 13 Apr 2011 Posts: 1869 Location: Denver, Colorado
Expire: 2013-01-25
|
Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David wrote:
It is possible that it's from light leakage. The tin looked a bit dinged on one side, but the tape was still in place as put on at the factory. I unspooled about 400 feet of the 2,000-foot roll and put it onto standard 100-foot cores, so maybe some of the film from further into the reel will be better. _________________ http://www.youtube.com/user/hancockDavidM |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|