View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1214 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 8:49 pm Post subject: first frames nikkor P 105mm f2.5 |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
Nice purple coatings make this one very attractive.
Plenty of aperture there for a short telephoto.
90% crop of a full frame monochrome showing a grey bushy tail squirrel's butt end at a little over 80 feet.
F8 and ISO 200.
Color test on some of Mrs.' painted ceramic figurines at mfd, wide open at ISO 400, window-sill back-lit.
Quick try on an extension tube giving approx. 1:1.
Wide open (equivalent aperture almost 5.6) and ISO 3200.
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex ph
Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1674
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Exempalry sharpness! Well done. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4080 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2022 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Here are three samples of the famous Nikkor - on the left an early sample of the Sonnar type Nippon Kogaku Nikkor-P Auto 1:2.5 f=10.5cm, in the middle the Nikkor-P Auto 1:2.5 f=105mm (Sonnar type as well), and on the right a multi-coated sample ot the Xenotar type Nikon Nikkor-P-C Auto 1:2.5 f=105mm.
Interestingly, the barrel of the Sonnar type lenses is slightly different, and the earlier sample has only "feet" markings (no "meter").
My first copy of the Nikkor-P-C Auto 1:2.5 f=105mm (not shown here) was quite a beaten sample which certainly had seen a lot of (professional) use. It came from the Interlaken area, a most beautiful spot in the Bernese Alps. A few years later my favourite local photo shop had a like-new sample of the same lens (the one shown here). Once I had the Xenotar type, of course I started looking for the Sonnar type as well ... and not much later an equally beautiful Sonnar type was for sale at a local auction. Finally the lens shown in the middle - not pristine, but fairly well preserved - was given to me for free, by the same shop where I had bought the Xenotar type lens.
Together, all three lenses shown here did cost a mere CHF 225.--.
S
PS. I still don't have a K type, Ai or AiS 2.5/105mm Nikkor ... _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1214 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
I think there may have been some over/under-lap with when which coatings appeared on nikon lenses.
I haven't been able to find documentation of this yet- but some photos on the n/z phot. nikon lens site appear to be the same way.
The coating colors in your photo of the "P.C." appear identical to the coatings of my slightly earlier "P".
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KEO
Joined: 27 Sep 2018 Posts: 775 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KEO wrote:
I have a P and a K.
I think the K is a bit better, but they're both excellent.
To my eye the difference in rendering between the two types is quite evident if you compare them side-to-side. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11059 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2022 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Silver nose == Sonnar
Quite a different lens! (I like MUCH better ) _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Doc Sharptail
Joined: 23 Nov 2020 Posts: 1214 Location: Winnipeg Canada
|
Posted: Sun Apr 10, 2022 7:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Doc Sharptail wrote:
Fast pan shot at f4.
Interestingly enough, I was able to manual focus, work the aperture and pan for 2 frames that ended up almost in focus...
First shot at f2.5
F8 is where this lens seems to be happy...
-D.S. _________________
D-810, F2, FTN.
35mm f2 O.C. nikkor
50 f2 H nikkor, 50 f 1.4 AI-s, 135 f3.5 Q,
50 f2 K nikkor 2x, 28-85mm f3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 35-105 3.5-4.5 A/I-s, 200mm f4 Micro A/I, partial list.
"Ain't no half-way" -S.R.V.
"Oh Yeah... Alright" -Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|