View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 5:26 am Post subject: FD 35/2 SSC |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
I sold my canon FD 35/2 white nose to member here some months ago. Somehow I miss this lens. when my friend sell this successor, 35/2 SSC, I took it.
Here's my conclusion compared to WIhete nose.
The SSC one is lighter
SSC is sharper in wide open
Some samples
wide open
_________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
this the concave? e.g. f/16 smallest aperture. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
the white nose is the concave I used to own it, this is the ssc, smallest aperture is 22 _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
uhoh7
Joined: 24 Nov 2010 Posts: 1300 Location: Idaho, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
uhoh7 wrote:
IAZA wrote: |
the white nose is the concave I used to own it, this is the ssc, smallest aperture is 22 |
correct me, but the true thorium concave 35/2 is an SSC---says this on the front.
There are actually at least three SSC versions.
And in my research I found only one of all the 35/2s has the the concave element. This is the second or third SSC, stops to f/16 and can be IDed by serial. Mine is 60045.
I think that's mostly from the the Canon Museum.
That said, not sure it makes any difference except for the yellowing when kept out of light. _________________ Making MFlenses safe for the letter *L* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Thu Jan 13, 2011 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
I'll speak from personal experience. The initial version of the FD 35/2 was the chrome nose with concave front element. This lens was updated to SSC status with the black filter ring, keeping its concave element. The optical configuration was changed ca. 1976 with this FD/SSC design getting the convex front element. I own the convex SSC and have seen the concave configurations in both chrome nose and SSC versions. _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
Oh.. maybe I'm lack of information. Ok here's the one I sold
front
Here's the one I have now and used for those pictures above
_________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
casualcollector
Joined: 01 Aug 2008 Posts: 749 Location: Spaced out on Florida's Space Coast
|
Posted: Fri Jan 14, 2011 1:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
casualcollector wrote:
Canon Compendium lists six iterations of the 35/2. Sixth is the "New FD" version. Of the remaining five, the chart shows three versions as being introduced in March of 1971. The SSC version (#4) is dated March 1973 with the remark "Same lens, SSC Version. Version #5 shows an intro date of April 1976 with remarks "New optics, floating elements".
The example in your picture is an early version. The green circle on the aperture ring was replaced with a green A in later versions. A lock button to secure the aperture ring in the A position was also added later.
Chrome front lenses had the front body made from brass and chromed. They are specified as weighing 420 grams. Black front lenses had the front body made from aluminum and weigh 370 grams.
If you were to locate all the production variations of the FD mount 35/2, you would certainly have five lenses and perhaps more. They were also available marked B&H/Canon as Canon supplied some cameras and lenses to Bell and Howell after their distribution agreement ended in the early 70s.
Canon Compendium is a well researched book authored by former Shutterbug magazine editor Bob Shell and published by Hove in 1994.
Bill _________________ In Search Of "R" Serial Soligors
Found: 135/2.8 #R407660, 200/4 #R405526, 300/5.5 #R411127 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|