View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pabeu
Joined: 25 Apr 2018 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pabeu wrote:
caspert79 wrote: |
Those are nice images for sure, but in terms of image quality they look just like a pretty average standard lens with close focusing ability IMO. Prices on Ebay are quite wild, in the same territory as some of the Olympus Zuiko OM 50/2 macro's (which is a real macro and fast as well). |
With patience a ZF Makro Planar 50/2 should not be far either.
ZF prices have been going down steadily after Nikon stopped making new cameras with F Mount. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3310 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Dec 16, 2024 7:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
pabeu wrote: |
caspert79 wrote: |
Those are nice images for sure, but in terms of image quality they look just like a pretty average standard lens with close focusing ability IMO. Prices on Ebay are quite wild, in the same territory as some of the Olympus Zuiko OM 50/2 macro's (which is a real macro and fast as well). |
With patience a ZF Makro Planar 50/2 should not be far either.
ZF prices have been going down steadily after Nikon stopped making new cameras with F Mount. |
Yeah, the 100/2 makro planars are often not too expensive either. _________________ For Sale:
(rare) Mamiya EF 35mm f/2.8
Revuenon (Mamiya EF) 28mm f/2.8
Vivitar S1 1:1 adapter for Series 1 90mm f/2.5
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
PB for info |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianSVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2023 Posts: 406 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 1:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
These Chinon lenses have pretty standard construction. remove the front with a rubber tool, and the lens cells/elements with pin spanners. Nearly all examples are going to have oily blades (hence the stuck aperture). Removal of the rear mout varies depending on whether this is the straight-barreled or tapered version.
siudym wrote: |
I would like to try cleaning the lenses - please give me some tips on how to disassemble this lens safely. |
Last edited by BrianSVP on Tue Dec 17, 2024 1:37 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianSVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2023 Posts: 406 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 1:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
Deleted dupe message. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulhofseth
Joined: 05 Mar 2011 Posts: 586 Location: Norway
Expire: 2018-06-28
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
paulhofseth wrote:
As everybody seems to adverize their own verions of fast macros I should perhaps point out that Kern Aarau made the Alpa Macro Switars in two vrsions, f. 1,8 and f,1,9 with slightly different constructions before they gave up and shipped less than 100 lens blocks to Japan for mounting in m42-thread mount helixes there. Those have rear elements that will collide with the mirror of ordinary M42 cameras.
p. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 701
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 9:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
Hey, my JML 56 mm f/1.2 wants to enter this competition as well!
The complexity of simple things by simple.joy, on Flickr
Colory intake by simple.joy, on Flickr
Defying the bleakness by simple.joy, on Flickr
Don’t cast your pearls before swine by simple.joy, on Flickr
Paper flow by simple.joy, on Flickr
It might not be fully sharp at f/1.2 but at f/1.7 it feels perfectly comfortable already! _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3310 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Tue Dec 17, 2024 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Stunning results ! _________________ For Sale:
(rare) Mamiya EF 35mm f/2.8
Revuenon (Mamiya EF) 28mm f/2.8
Vivitar S1 1:1 adapter for Series 1 90mm f/2.5
ISCO Isconar 100mm f/4 (Exa)
PB for info |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BrianSVP
Joined: 09 Jun 2023 Posts: 406 Location: Philadelphia
|
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 12:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
BrianSVP wrote:
I mean, these are great photos, but doesn't this lens kinda stretch the bounds of what we're discussing here? Wasn't this a shutter-mounted fixed-focus dedicated CRT lens with no helical and using specialized cameras? The Repro Nikkors at least were meant to be mounted on standard 35mm F mount cameras, even if they didn't have helicals.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
simple.joy
Joined: 30 May 2022 Posts: 701
|
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2024 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
simple.joy wrote:
BrianSVP wrote: |
I mean, these are great photos, but doesn't this lens kinda stretch the bounds of what we're discussing here? Wasn't this a shutter-mounted fixed-focus dedicated CRT lens with no helical and using specialized cameras? The Repro Nikkors at least were meant to be mounted on standard 35mm F mount cameras, even if they didn't have helicals.
|
Thank you! I have to admit that I'm not really familiar with either of the two lenses' original mounting solutions or cameras, so I just assumed the JML lens was used with some standard Polaroid close-up camera. Of course you've got a point when it comes to the original intention of the lens. That being said the standard M39 thread of the JML 56 mm lens likely enables it to be mounted onto most cameras with ease, while the (whatever that) thread on the Repro-Nikkor ist, plus its big diameter can pose a real challenge. Of course neither is a regular taking lens, so the Porst, Chinon & Alpa lenses can keep their titles.
At the end of the day I don't care about original designation though, and so I think it's often worth looking into lenses from industrial applications as alternatives. _________________ ---
Manual lens enthusiast
https://www.flickr.com/photos/simple_joy/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
siudym
Joined: 27 Jun 2015 Posts: 82 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
siudym wrote:
I cleaned up the edges of the rear lens and I think it did a pretty good job. The problem is that I didn't remember the position Is the flat side on the inside of the lens and the curved side on the outside?
#1
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/siudym
https://www.youtube.com/@lucassdmsiudym7707/videos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 680 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
Most ~50mm lenses curve outward with the rear element, if the rear element has a curve that is, quite a few also appear flat. A notable exception is the Konica 50/1.4 which curves inward. However, I don't have direct information for the lens. Try it each way and do some tests, it hopefully would be obvious, as that is a reasonable curvature. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
siudym
Joined: 27 Jun 2015 Posts: 82 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
siudym wrote:
While access to the rear element is easy, the front one has a sleeve (thread) that has been additionally filled in two places with black glue... I used a lot of force but I can't unscrew it. The aperture is there, it works, but with considerable resistance (oiled).
#1
#4
#2
#3
_________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/siudym
https://www.youtube.com/@lucassdmsiudym7707/videos |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|