View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Yossarian9
Joined: 30 Dec 2015 Posts: 2 Location: Wisconsin, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:04 pm Post subject: effective f-stop value |
|
|
Yossarian9 wrote:
If one is using a medium-format lens (Mamiya 645 55mm F2. with an adapter (Photodiox Pro) on a Nikon DSLR (D7200) ...
Do the F-stop values represent the same?
In other words, the Mamiya lens is much bigger. the F2.8 in medium format is a larger window of light than a native Nikon lens at F2.8.
So is an F-stop of 2.8 in medium format, effectively something akin to an F1.8 on Nikon??
Appreciate your thoughts.
Yossarian. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
The f-stops are the same regardless of the format on wich the lens is used (lens-depend, not camere/format-depend).
f-stop = focal length/diameter of thr entrance pupil of the lens(= diameter of the image of the diaphragm as it can be seen through the front of the lens). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009 Posts: 7588 Location: Hong Kong
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
The F stop value will not be changed as it is the property of a lens. The main reason why medium format lens is biggest is to get a large are of illumination/image circle. _________________ The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yossarian9
Joined: 30 Dec 2015 Posts: 2 Location: Wisconsin, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 7:21 pm Post subject: effective f |
|
|
Yossarian9 wrote:
Thats why I am asking about EFFECTIVE F-stop value... from the camera's sensor perspective.
Look at this picture. both are 55mm at F/4. obviously the one on the left is the medium format.
To me the medium F/4 is bigger, and therefore will get more light to the sensor.
Am I thinking about this wrong?
Mostly, just want to know if the F2.8 medium format lens would be as good in low-light as, say, a nikon F1.8.
I suppose shooting the two would be way to find out.
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SXR_Mark
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England
|
Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SXR_Mark wrote:
The density of the light (number of photons per unit area) will be the same for the two lenses when operating with the same F-stop (but see note below). The medium format lens transmits more light in total but images it to a larger area. The light that is received by the DSLR sensor will be the same whichever lens is used. The exposure is determined by the light density not the total amount of light.
NB. Strictly speaking, this is true for lenses of the same T-stop value. Lenses with the same F-stop will not, in general, have the same transmission since the F-stop is a geometric value that does not take into account the light lost at each glass to air boundary in the lens (absorption losses are usually negligible). A complicated lens, even with state-of-the-art AR coatings will still have a T-stop somewhat different to the F-stop value. _________________ Olympus OM-D E-M1 for everything |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Gerald
Joined: 25 Mar 2014 Posts: 1197 Location: Brazil
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 11:34 pm Post subject: Re: effective f |
|
|
Gerald wrote:
Yossarian9 wrote: |
Thats why I am asking about EFFECTIVE F-stop value... from the camera's sensor perspective.
Look at this picture. both are 55mm at F/4. obviously the one on the left is the medium format.
To me the medium F/4 is bigger, and therefore will get more light to the sensor.
Am I thinking about this wrong?
Mostly, just want to know if the F2.8 medium format lens would be as good in low-light as, say, a nikon F1.8.
I suppose shooting the two would be way to find out.
|
Notice you are seeing the exit pupils of the lenses. Yes, for the same F-number, the exit pupils may have different dimensions and be at different distances from the focal plane. However, if you look at the entrance pupils at the other side of the lenses, their diameters should be the same, no matter what type of lens. _________________ If raindrops were perfect lenses, the rainbow did not exist. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan_
Joined: 05 Dec 2012 Posts: 1058 Location: Romania
Expire: 2016-12-19
|
Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
dan_ wrote:
Nikon 1.8 lens will be better in low light than Mamiya 2.8. Any 1.8 lens will be better in low light than any 2.8 lens, regardless of the format they are designed for.
Read carefully the wiki article about f-number:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-number
Both SXR_Mark and Gerald are speaking about 2 lenses with the same f-number, not about comparing your Nikon f/1.8 with a medium format f/2.8 lens, as you asked. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11067 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Lens made for medium format needs a bigger hole to let in the extra light needed to cover the area bigger than 24x36mm.
Learning about T-stop and F-stop difference might help here...
Gerald wrote: |
... if you look at the entrance pupils at the other side of the lenses, their diameters should be the same, no matter what type of lens. |
Huh? I don't think so... _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|