View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2537
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:11 pm Post subject: CZJ Biotar copy TTArtisan 75mm F1.5 M42 |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
https://youtu.be/gPiqWqlXys0?si=PJMfg9Hu1dD8E-tH
https://youtu.be/AcyTgPTjnIA?si=HQac8JvkQdA_urfZ
sells for $269 on the TTartisan website https://ttartisan.store/products/ttartisan-75mm-f1-5
captured from the vid:
_________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 424
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 7:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
is this a try to re-Jupier-9 on M42 ?
edit: i should read the title .. never mind _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
**
Last edited by alex_d on Sat Oct 05, 2024 8:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11061 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sat Oct 05, 2024 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Wow, that is some really shallow dof! (Now I'm having a GAS flareup LOL) _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
caspert79
Joined: 31 Oct 2010 Posts: 3225 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
caspert79 wrote:
Very nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blotafton
Joined: 08 Aug 2013 Posts: 1636 Location: Sweden
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blotafton wrote:
Yeah I want one.
I sold my Samyang 75mm f1.8 because I didn't like the output and said "I want a Biotar instead". Now there's another way! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11061 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 5:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
alex_d wrote: |
is this a try to re-Jupier-9 on M42 ?
edit: i should read the title .. never mind |
Yeah but without the title clue I'd have to agree with your guess. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dejan
Joined: 05 Jan 2021 Posts: 152 Location: Belgrade, Serbia
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dejan wrote:
Speaking of Jupiter 9 and Sonnar lenses, I hope some of those are coming next. I'd like me a nice Sonnar 50mm F1.5 variant, since I missed the chance of buying the original. Even better, so there will be no worries about separation and what not. They could also try with Biometar, that could also be interesting for MF users.
As for the Biotar copy, I have always prefered Helios 40-2 over the original, and that somewhat still stands. But the difference in WO sharpness actually matters in this case, I'm sure it makes the lens much easier to work with (focusing on the eye was a bit of a pain). This one is also much lighter and smaller, plus no more weird Leica-style aperture shape that always made me hesitant to shoot at F2-F2.8 when I wanted. A worthy consideration for sure. As for the actual Biotar original, I could buy one for 800 eur and I skipped it, since I don't care about resell value. Cca 300 for this one (after taxes) is a completely different song. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alex_d
Joined: 19 Jan 2019 Posts: 424
|
Posted: Sun Oct 06, 2024 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex_d wrote:
visualopsins wrote: |
alex_d wrote: |
is this a try to re-Jupier-9 on M42 ?
edit: i should read the title .. never mind |
Yeah but without the title clue I'd have to agree with your guess. |
i sold mine last week, a new one on m42 _________________ **
// See my selling items in the Market place
** |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2537
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2024 5:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
It looks like a big brother next to a Black Jupiter 9. I think the original CZJ still has more Magic. Softer due to less effective coatings. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004
Joined: 23 Jul 2021 Posts: 141 Location: United States
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
mr_tibbs2004 wrote:
D1N0 wrote: |
It looks like a big brother next to a Black Jupiter 9. I think the original CZJ still has more Magic. Softer due to less effective coatings. |
Is it $1200 better? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 4086 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Mon Oct 07, 2024 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Lens section of the original CZJ Biotar 1:1.5 f=7.5cm (right) vs the modern TTartisan 1.5/75mm (left).
Similoar lenses for sure, but by no means identical.
Keep in mind that the original Biotar 1.5/7.5cm has a distinctive yellowish-greenish color cast which is pretty nasty on color images (it can't really be corrected by adjusting the white balance!), but quite useful for b/w landscape images.
Aberrations of the original CZJ Biotar are pretty horrible at f1.5 (strong astigmatism coupled with cateye bokeh). Even at f5.6 the lens isn't that good (unlike newer superfast 85mm lenses), but at f11 it really shines - less lateral CAs than the 1.4/85mm lenses from the 1980s and 1990s!
S _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
|
y
Joined: 11 Aug 2013 Posts: 308 Location: EU
|
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
y wrote:
I've bought the lens immediately. It's superbly built and feels nice on Sony A7.
IIRC the output aims to be "modernized Biotar". However, the spinning background is present.
Even when you not pick the "swirling" focusing distance it still swirls a bit:
Jonas Rask got a beautify set of pics included in his review:
https://jonasraskphotography.com/2024/09/25/exploring-the-ttartisan-75mm-f-1-5-lens-a-new-classic/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pepperberry farm
Joined: 02 Jan 2017 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pepperberry farm wrote:
I bought one and have been using it constantly - I love it....
my only issue was that when mounted, it was almost 180* off from the mount (aperture/focus scale) - so I loosened the three grub screws, turned it to where I wanted it, tightened it all up, and away we went...
cosmos by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
and if you are looking for swirl:
the swirl by Pepperberry Farm, on Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pepperberryfarm/albums/72177720320900598/with/54044852285 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
y
Joined: 11 Aug 2013 Posts: 308 Location: EU
|
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 3:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
y wrote:
pepperberry farm wrote: |
my only issue was that when mounted, it was almost 180* off from the mount (aperture/focus scale) - so I loosened the three grub screws, turned it to where I wanted it, tightened it all up, and away we went... |
Yea, the lens comes with an adjustable mount - you can rotate it to align against any wonky M42 adapter/body.
The included user guide describes the process, although you still need a Torx T5 screwdriver to do that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pepperberry farm
Joined: 02 Jan 2017 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Mon Oct 14, 2024 4:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pepperberry farm wrote:
y wrote: |
pepperberry farm wrote: |
my only issue was that when mounted, it was almost 180* off from the mount (aperture/focus scale) - so I loosened the three grub screws, turned it to where I wanted it, tightened it all up, and away we went... |
Yea, the lens comes with an adjustable mount - you can rotate it to align against any wonky M42 adapter/body.
The included user guide describes the process, although you still need a Torx T5 screwdriver to do that. |
agreed - I happen to have one.... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|