View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Nice to see the rise in popularity of this lens, and the great results being uploaded - must take mine out for some exercise sometime soon _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
And please do share, Mal1905. This lens creates a love/hate relationship; after some sessions I'm ready to sell, then a few shots turns things around and gives a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction. I'm still learning what type pictures work out well and make the most sense to take. Yesterday I was using it, trying different things when I spotted the plant in the first picture in my most recent series above. I thought little of it, but snapped on anyway. It turned out to be my favorite of all I've taken so far. Today I took it with me for a session photographing a friend's car. Was wondering what effects could be accomplished. I learned it's a lousy car lens. It's good for some things and definitely not for others. My spider shot demonstrates how sharp it can be in such shots, but it doesn't give a special look, so really why bother when a normal lens can do better. It is best served when you can isolate an image, giving careful consideration to distance between you and image, and image and background.
Any pictures I've considered a success, or near success, I've uploaded here: http://www.pbase.com/mdlempert/cyclop The old fat guy on the bench is me. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Oct 04, 2010 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
I'm having a great time learning to use this lens... I hope you all don't mind if I continue to share.
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 6:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
I love that last one. The background effect is superb.
You were going to sell this lens a week ago. Can I buy it if it takes pictures like this? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Tue Oct 05, 2010 10:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Wow, I think a have to take mine for a trip again
Impressive results, very artistic. I could have those on my living room wall _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3705 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 4:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Just like to warn you: Click here to see on Ebay.de has perturbing element. _________________ ---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Yes, not purple coating. Image quality is pants. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Papapishu
Joined: 26 Feb 2010 Posts: 38 Location: Bushwick, Brooklyn
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Papapishu wrote:
Got one today from California off the bay. Paid a hair more than I was comfortable, (70 dollars all told, although no international shipping is a definite plus) but after months of salivating at this thread, I figured I should pick one up.
Yellow coating. No protruding rear element. Swirl. Has the bumpy matte finish.
Focusing is a bitch, although easier with focus assist in live view. Soft, although shocked at the lack of purple fringing this wide open.
Viva la ROMZ. Does anyone here have the 35mm adaptor for the H3T-1 unit? Has anybody even seen it? I'm curious what the night vision shots would look like. _________________ I shoot movies on:
Russian: Helios 44-2, MC Zennitar Fisheye
Pentax: Super Takumar 35/3.5, 85/1.9, SMC Pentax (K-mount) 50/1.4
Other: Yashica ML 28/2.8, Vivitar (m42) 20/3.8, Auto Sears (M42) 135/2.8, Angeniux 28mm F/3.5 (EXA)
Looking for: A Pentax/Russian/Yashica/Zeiss 35/2, Helios 40-2, a sharp, fast zoom and any fast sharp lens that's sharp completely open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 7:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Lets see some samples please if you get it working |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Papapishu: Congratulations. Let's see some of your best first shots. They will get better as you learn to use the lens. Some suggestions... stay out of sunlight; shoot your subject on angle when you want to emphasize shallow depth of field; shoot on flat plane with subject when you want to maximize depth of field; and bracket focus. Expect lots of failures and just missed, mingled throughout with successes. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
justtorchit
Joined: 12 Oct 2009 Posts: 269 Location: St. Louis, MO
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
justtorchit wrote:
Woodrim -
Those shots of the wheat-looking grass (botany was never my strong suite) you have on your site look beautiful! Really, you have some great results with this lens! _________________ David
www.davidkovaluk.com - personal website
www.instagram.com/davidkovaluk
http://makingnottaking.blogspot.com/ - photoblog |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Thank you, justtorchit, I appreciate that.
The fun comes from the challenge of using this lens. I can't over emphasize how important it is to plan your approach with this lens. I find it quite amazing how careful use can provide the most bizarre of effects as well as some that might appear to have come from a normal lens. These pictures don't betray the lens used, and I think most people would be hard pressed to have guessed it:
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Papapishu
Joined: 26 Feb 2010 Posts: 38 Location: Bushwick, Brooklyn
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Papapishu wrote:
So, I tested out the lens. I'm not sure how to upload here, but if you want to see a full gallery, I have a link up on my facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2055051&id=43102194&l=4c7e436a61
Also, I actually emailed the maker, ROMZ regarding the lens design. I asked if it was at all related to the Helios 40-2. He wrote the following:
Dear Mr. Person,
No. These is two different objectives lens are not connected on the design.
I direct to you our catalogue of production. Probably will be interest for you something.
Best regards,
Sergey Protosavitskiy,
General director _________________ I shoot movies on:
Russian: Helios 44-2, MC Zennitar Fisheye
Pentax: Super Takumar 35/3.5, 85/1.9, SMC Pentax (K-mount) 50/1.4
Other: Yashica ML 28/2.8, Vivitar (m42) 20/3.8, Auto Sears (M42) 135/2.8, Angeniux 28mm F/3.5 (EXA)
Looking for: A Pentax/Russian/Yashica/Zeiss 35/2, Helios 40-2, a sharp, fast zoom and any fast sharp lens that's sharp completely open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Did you add a diaphragm of some sort? Had to for some/many of those pictures. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Took the monster for a walk today
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 6:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
All really good shots. The portraits of the girl and the cat are great and I am torn between the pigeon and the bird in the tree - OK - they are all great
A difficult lens from which you have wrought great things |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Nordentro: Very, very nice. You certainly hit the focus on those. Did you use something for a diaphragm? The depth seems too good for the wide open lens. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Nordentro: Very, very nice. You certainly hit the focus on those. Did you use something for a diaphragm? The depth seems too good for the wide open lens. |
No diaphragm, the 2x crop sensor on the E-p1 may fool you a bit
Thx for commenting _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Papapishu
Joined: 26 Feb 2010 Posts: 38 Location: Bushwick, Brooklyn
|
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Papapishu wrote:
woodrim wrote: |
Did you add a diaphragm of some sort? Had to for some/many of those pictures. |
No Diaphram on any in the gallery I posted. All with an intensely high shutter speed on an APS-C sensor (t2i).
I also found that there is a tiny hole in my lens-cap that turns it into a VERY stopped down pinhole camera. So I guess my options are f/1.5 or f/32. It also showed me that I need to clean my sensor, unfortunately. _________________ I shoot movies on:
Russian: Helios 44-2, MC Zennitar Fisheye
Pentax: Super Takumar 35/3.5, 85/1.9, SMC Pentax (K-mount) 50/1.4
Other: Yashica ML 28/2.8, Vivitar (m42) 20/3.8, Auto Sears (M42) 135/2.8, Angeniux 28mm F/3.5 (EXA)
Looking for: A Pentax/Russian/Yashica/Zeiss 35/2, Helios 40-2, a sharp, fast zoom and any fast sharp lens that's sharp completely open. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
here are some more pictures:
[img]
[/img]
[img]
[/img] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
one more...
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
I'm sorry, but I have fallen pathetically in love with this lens. Every time I see shots posted in this thread I go all goose bumpy. It is such a shame I can't match them |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
You did quite well, Martyn.
tomasg: What distance between you and the boy in the portraits? No added diaphragm, right? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Has anyone taken this lens apart? I see that there are three screws hidden and revealed by the focus ring movement, but I hesitate to unscrew them without knowing. My rear element is loose and I would like to fix that. However, I do not know whether it is a lens element or just protective glass. _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tomasg
Joined: 01 Nov 2009 Posts: 1135
Expire: 2014-04-28
|
Posted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tomasg wrote:
Woodrim, the distance is about 3 meters i think, it s the maximum distance i can focus with the lens (Nikon D300), it happens that it s also the right distance to get the best swirls, IF the background is at the correct distance form the subject! No aperture was used.
Regarding the construction of the lens, i simply unscrewed the font elment and acessed the lens elements inside. There are some big elements inside and also very recessed, deep into the lens, it s difficult to put them back in.
I also managed to unscrew the ring in the middle of the lens, under it i found an easy acess to the helicoid, a small part of it, i simply lubricated it, now the focusing is soooo smooth
I had much less fortune trying to unscrew the rear part of the lens, the 3 tiny screws that hold the big rear ring, had proven too be to stiff to unscrew, even after a good bath with WD-40. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|