View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
SiRCRX
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 Posts: 17 Location: K.L.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 5:40 am Post subject: Could Contax 35-70 f3.4 'replace' my trusty 50s 1.4 ? |
|
|
SiRCRX wrote:
I'm seriously thinking to buy Contax manual zoom 35-70 3.4 lens based on my readings & pics I saw + the convenience of zoom.
I'd like to get opinions, whether this Contax could deliver the image (at~50mm) that I like as those delivered by my trusty 50s 1.4 ? ( SMC Tak, Super Tak & EBC Fujinon )
Would be great if anyone who has/had these to share their thought.
Thankss _________________ Snap away ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkokan
Joined: 17 Apr 2012 Posts: 170 Location: Finland
Expire: 2015-12-02
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 5:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
mikkokan wrote:
Yes it can be easier to use but zoom lenses can never replace fixed focal lenght lenses. F1.4 vs 3.4 for low light or shallow depth of field. Usually colors, sharpness and overall image quality is better in fixed focal lenses.
But if you mostly take photos of landscapes etc then the Contax is fine. _________________ Canon EOS 1Ds mkII, 1D mkIV, 1D mkII, Fuji X-E1
Takumars 28mm 3.5, 50mm 1.4, 135mm 3.5, Helios 44-2, Tamron 70-210, Domiplan 50mm, Trioplan 100mm
AF-lenses:Canon 24-105L, Sigma 50mm 1.4HSM, Canon 135mm 2.0L, Canon 24-105L, Sigma 12-24, Sigma ART 35mm 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SiRCRX
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 Posts: 17 Location: K.L.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
SiRCRX wrote:
Yup. Noted that.
I'll definitely lose the shallow DOF.
But the other stuffs (sharpness, color, contrast) , I'm not so sure .... since I read that Contax 35-70 is as sharp as great primes + the famous Zeis micro contrast could even be better than the Taks, EBC Fujinon 50s _________________ Snap away ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mikkokan
Joined: 17 Apr 2012 Posts: 170 Location: Finland
Expire: 2015-12-02
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
mikkokan wrote:
So is the 3.4 enough conserning DOF and low light shooting? Only you know the answer
Also remember that 50mm primes are very sharp when stopped down to same level 3.4-4. _________________ Canon EOS 1Ds mkII, 1D mkIV, 1D mkII, Fuji X-E1
Takumars 28mm 3.5, 50mm 1.4, 135mm 3.5, Helios 44-2, Tamron 70-210, Domiplan 50mm, Trioplan 100mm
AF-lenses:Canon 24-105L, Sigma 50mm 1.4HSM, Canon 135mm 2.0L, Canon 24-105L, Sigma 12-24, Sigma ART 35mm 1.4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SiRCRX
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 Posts: 17 Location: K.L.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
SiRCRX wrote:
I will use 3.4 for situations that suits it.
I know I will lose DOF , so I know which kind of shots I will use it for.
Low light .... well , it will be more for outdoor + I live in the tropic
Like mentioned , I'm not so sure on the comparison for sharpness, color & contrast since I read excellent feedback on these for the 35-70 Contax _________________ Snap away ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
memetph
Joined: 01 Dec 2013 Posts: 940 Location: Poland
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
memetph wrote:
SiRCRX wrote: |
I will use 3.4 for situations that suits it.
I know I will lose DOF , so I know which kind of shots I will use it for.
Low light .... well , it will be more for outdoor + I live in the tropic
Like mentioned , I'm not so sure on the comparison for sharpness, color & contrast since I read excellent feedback on these for the 35-70 Contax |
If this zoom can equal the sharpness across the frame and contrast of a very good 50mm at f5.6 , it is a brillant zoom indeed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
It is a brilliant zoom indeed. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tedat
Joined: 08 Nov 2011 Posts: 800 Location: Berlin/Germany
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 9:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tedat wrote:
+1
if f3.4 is fast enough for you.. yes it can replace your trusty 50s. This Vario-Sonnar has the same sharpness, color & contrast as the Contax primes. _________________ Regards
Jan
flickr
Sony A7RM2
Contax T*: Distagon 4/18, Distagon 2/28, Distagon 1.4/35, PC-Distagon 2.8/35, Planar 1.4/50, Planar 1.4/85, Planar 2/100, Planar 2/135, S-Planar 2.8/60, Tessar 2.8/45, Mirotar 8/500, Vario Sonnar 3.4/35-70, Vario Sonnar 4.5-5.6/100-300
Carl Zeiss for Rollei QBM: F-Distagon 2.8/16 HFT, Distagon 2.8/25, Planar 1.4/50 HFT, Sonnar 2.8/85
Konica Hexanon AR: 2.8/21, 1.2/57
Other: Minolta F2.8 [T4.5] 135mm STF, Meopta Meostigmat 1.4/70, Tokina AT-X 2.5/90.. and lots of early M42 Yashinon, Rikenon and Mamiya lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rudolfkremers
Joined: 10 Jun 2014 Posts: 723 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2015-08-08
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
rudolfkremers wrote:
Also, you gain something new, which is an extremely useful Macro mode! _________________ https://www.rudolfkremers.com
https://www.flickr.com/photos/rudolfkremers/
https://www.facebook.com/rudolf.kremers
https://www.omni-labs.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Billou
Joined: 01 Feb 2013 Posts: 169 Location: Germany
Expire: 2015-05-19
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Billou wrote:
I owned a Vario-Sonnar 35-70 a few months ago, I used it for one day on a A7 body. I didn't like the camera because of bad ergonomics, I sold it after a few days and got an X-T1. I sold the 35-70 a few weeks after that, because its focal range was not so useful on a APS-C camera.
Despite the problems I had with the A7, I remember that day as one of my best in photography. I still look at the pictures I took this day, and continue to think that the 35-70 was really the best lens I ever used, period. The 3D feeling, the colors... The Fuji is a great camera and the lenses are amazing, we all know that... But the 35-70 gave me more. The pictures have more soul, more depth.
I bought another 35-70 recently, almost brand new. I tried it on the Fuji, and well, it's as sharp as the XF Aspherical 18-55mm, which is not a crappy kit lens, it's really something. It says a lot. I can make some comparaison shots with a few lenses later today if you are interested.
My recommandation: if you find a good one at a reasonnable price, take it. It might not replace a 50/1.4 for portraits, but it will surely replace everything else. The lens has its downsides however, it's a very complicated mechanical design (find a perfect one that had been looked after and not abused, otherwise infinity stop or zoom action can be off) it's a dust trap and it's a bit heavy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009 Posts: 4269 Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 1:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
yes its reputed to be as good as the primes. however, while you get multiple fl convenience, you lose compactness and ergonomics. this is a large heavy lens. for me that effects 'convenience' to the point where its useless because i won't carry it around. of course others views can rightly vary as this is totally subjective. were i to consider an slr zoom in this category it would probably be the leica r 35-70/4. yes its a half stop slower, but its much more compact and equally outstanding IQ. just a thought. _________________ Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long'
Last edited by rbelyell on Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:39 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
Or why not take a look at the Zuiko OM 35-80/2.8 (it is quite expensive).
Fast enough for most portraits and IQ second to none. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Pontus wrote: |
Or why not take a look at the Zuiko OM 35-80/2.8 (it is quite expensive).
Fast enough for most portraits and IQ second to none. |
I don't recall seeing pictures from this lens. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 3:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
I have the Zeiss, the OM and the Angenieux. They are all very good.
But to be fair, the price/performance is best for the Zeiss. Unless you are a videographer, then you would prefer the Angenieux.
Some samples from the Zuiko in this thread: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/752043/0?keyword=zuiko,35-80 _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kenetik
Joined: 02 Mar 2014 Posts: 521
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kenetik wrote:
One thing to look out for with the Zeiss Contax 35-70 is that they sometimes do not focus to infinity properly (maybe it is just on certain adapters), which obv is not desirable.
Someone on mflenses posted a diy thread on a screw that needs to be adjusted to get infinity working. Can anyone confirm if this is an issue with certain samples of the lens? _________________ ________________________________________________________
I buy lots of lenses and sometimes I even use them... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
shapencolour
Joined: 03 Oct 2013 Posts: 270
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
shapencolour wrote:
kenetik : Yes - by means of IQ.No - by being slow and pretty large.Buy it ,you won't be disappointed,but don't sell your trusty 50s on behalf of this purchase. _________________ shapencolour |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Billou
Joined: 01 Feb 2013 Posts: 169 Location: Germany
Expire: 2015-05-19
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 6:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Billou wrote:
I can confirm the infinity problems. I had two copies of the lens and on both, infinity was off. You can adjust it pretty easily on the lens. This is a great feature.
I also used to own the 80-200 and the 100-300, and both had the focus going a bit above infinity. Maybe it is a feature on this lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Very personal business this.
People define sharpness, contrast, etc. differently in practice and it does not have that much to do with test shots or lpmm sharpness.
If it works for you its the best for you.
If I need to take a picture for a serious purpose generally I use my Pentax 24mm.
But the lens I like these days for fun is - a Sun 38-90 zoom, early 1970s vintage.
Which should be considered garbage these days, objectively. But I like it, I don't know why. Next week maybe something else will seem more fun. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
The VS 35-70/3.4 is one of the best lenses I have ever used. Sharp across the frame and pop at larger apertures. Perfect on FF. _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frenched
Joined: 16 Feb 2013 Posts: 395 Location: MD USA
Expire: 2014-06-17
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
frenched wrote:
As Luis said, it is a personal choice.
I've owned the Contax 35-70 for some time and as a result got rid of all my "normals". It's the only zoom I own and the one lens I have that cover these focal lengths. Sharpness, color depth, contrast -- it's all there. It blows away most primes I've seen, to my eyes, in typical Zeiss fashion. I invested in a Leitax adapter for it to work on my Canon crop and full-frame bodies and it performs predictably and exceptionally well. Can't speak to infinity as I rarely go there. If you can score a nice one for under $450 USD you've done good. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SiRCRX
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 Posts: 17 Location: K.L.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SiRCRX wrote:
Thanks guys ....
The hunt for a good copy is now ON
Anyway, I was just a bit surprised if this lens is just as sharp as XF18-55 (Billou's comment & I think I trust his experience) , bcoz I read in many places that it is as sharp as Contax primes.
I do not have the XF18-55, I know it is not an ordinary kit lens, but I'd never thought it could be sharper than Contax primes.
My trusty 50s 1.4 will stay ..... S-M-C Tak, Super Tak 8 element , EBC Fujinon , they are my very first lens _________________ Snap away ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SiRCRX
Joined: 12 Nov 2014 Posts: 17 Location: K.L.
|
Posted: Fri Dec 19, 2014 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SiRCRX wrote:
also .... Zuiko 35-80 2.8 was also in my radar , but it's too expensive. I'd rather get Contax 100/2 _________________ Snap away ..... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pontus
Joined: 18 Dec 2011 Posts: 1471 Location: Jakobstad, Finland
Expire: 2016-08-25
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 11:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
Pontus wrote:
SiRCRX wrote: |
also .... Zuiko 35-80 2.8 was also in my radar , but it's too expensive. I'd rather get Contax 100/2 |
Or think even more exotic and go for the Zuiko OM 100/2. A fantastic lens that doesn't get talked about a lot simply because it is so rare. _________________ Follow this link for my FOR SALE list (partially updated 19.11.2015) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Billou
Joined: 01 Feb 2013 Posts: 169 Location: Germany
Expire: 2015-05-19
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Billou wrote:
Some quick test pictures, comparing the Fujinon XF 18-55 and the 35-70 Contax... Straight from camera, no sharpening, ISO 800. (yep it's cloudy here!)
50mm, f/5.6, first the Fujinon, next the Vario-Sonnar.
The Vario-Sonnar is slightly sharper.
At 35mm f/3.6, the Fujinon is just a bit sharper. Not by much. It has more contrast though.
Fujinon:
Vario-Sonnar:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Billou
Joined: 01 Feb 2013 Posts: 169 Location: Germany
Expire: 2015-05-19
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2014 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Billou wrote:
Some pictures from the day I had a 35-70 on a Sony A7 body. Historic race at Hockenheim.
100% crop:
The 3D of zeiss lenses is here !
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|