View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:15 pm Post subject: Chinon Tomioka 1.4/55 on EOS 5D |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
My first shots with the recently arrived 'baby' Tomioka (I'm saving up for the 1.2 ) on the 5D.
When focus is at infinity, there's the smallest suggestion of mirror-slap, but not enough to warrant a shave just yet methinks.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10472 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
congrats! nice results! _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Are these shots taken wide open ? _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Dec 10, 2008 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Looks very nice ! Thank you for sharing! _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Yes, all handheld at 1.4, ISO 100 and a variety of shutter speeds.
sichko wrote: |
Are these shots taken wide open ? |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Many thanks. Is this the "Chinon Tomioka" which actually has "Tomioka" written on the front ring ? There is the "CHINON AUTO" which is sometimes described as TOMIOKA although I'm not sure what the evidence is. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
sichko wrote: |
Many thanks. Is this the "Chinon Tomioka" which actually has "Tomioka" written on the front ring ? There is the "CHINON AUTO" which is sometimes described as TOMIOKA although I'm not sure what the evidence is. |
Hi again John,
I've seen these lenses in the past and I too wondered where the Tomioka connection came from - I know that Chinon was one of several companies for whom Tomioka made lenses, but I always presumed that they were badged accordingly.
Here's the lens itself - I must admit to being quite pleased with it and used it and my Jupiter-9 2/85 for some portraits of my niece today.
Last edited by Mal1905 on Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
KhanX
Joined: 06 Sep 2007 Posts: 430 Location: Bangkok, Thailand, München, Göttingen, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
KhanX wrote:
Great result. Tomioka is the best lens I never got _________________ Camera : Leica M8, Sony Nex5, Sigma SD14, Canon 5D, Olympus E-1, Panasonic DMC L1, Pentax K10D Grand Prix, Nikon D1X, Contax RTS III, Contax 167MT, Exakta RTL1000, Minolta X-700, Canon T90, Canon F-1, Pentacon Six TL
Lens :
Tele : Canon FD 300mm f2.8 s.s.c. fluorite, Mamiya 645 500mm f5.6, Pentacon 500mm f5.6, Sigma APO 300mm f4 macro, Nikkor Reflex C 500mm f8, Canon FD 200mm f2.8 s.s.c., Rubinar 300mm f4.5 mirror
Macro : Vivitar Series 1 90mm f2.8, Vivitar VMC 100mm f2.8 Macro, Panagor PMC 90mm f2.8, Edicar 90mm f2.8 Macro, Nikon Micro 55mm f3.5, Takumar 50mm f4 Macro, Nikon Non AI 55mm f3.5 Micro, SMC Takumar 100mm f4 macro, Canon FD 100mm f4 Macro, Canon FD 200mm f4 Macro, Volna-9 50mm f2.8
Short tele : Pentacon Six 120mm f2.8, Carl Zeiss Contax T* 100mm f2, Meyer optik Trioplan 100MM F2.8, Porst 135mm f1.8, Sigmatel ys 135mm f1.8, Schneider 135mm f3.5, Makinon 135mm f3.5, Komura 135mm f3.5, Hexanon 100mm f2.8, Schneider Variogon 80-240mm 4.5, Schneider 135mm f4
Normal : Canon 50mm f0.95, Schneider 50mm f0.95, Hexanon 57mm f1.2, Hexanon 40mm f1.8, Taylor hobson 50mm f1.8, Cooke Kinetal 50mm f1.8, Canon EF 28mm f2.8, Leica 14-50mm f2.8-3.5 Mega O.I.S., Carl Zeiss Contax Distagon 18mm f4, Carl Zeiss Contax Planar T* 50mm f1.4, Carl Zeiss Contax 35mm f1.4, Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm f3.5-5.6 Macro, Yashica 35mm f2.8, Helios 44-2/58, Helios 85mm f1.5, Pentax SMC-M 50mm f1.4, Pentax SMC-F 28mm f2.8, Minolta MD Rokkor 28mm f2.8, Minolta MD Rokkor 35mm f2.8, Minolta MD Rokkor 50mm f1.7, Minolta MC PF Rokkor 50mm f1.4, Porst 28mm f2.8, Meyer - Optik Lydith 30mm f3.5, Nikon AIS 50mm f1.2, Tamron SP 28mm f2.8 adaptall, Pentax SMC Takumar 85mm f1.8, Vivitar Series 1 55mm f1.2, Canon FD 85mm f1.2L, Canon FD 55mm f1.2L, Angenieux 135mm f3.5, Cooke Kinetal 75mm f2.6, Steinheil 85mm f2.8, Leica M 50mm f2, Zeiss flextogon 35mm f2.4, Pancolar 50mm f1.8, Schneider Xenar 85mm f4
Wide : Leica Elmerit M 28mm f2.8 asph, Zeiss Contax 21mm f2.8, Zeiss Flextogon 20mm f2.8, Exakta 24mm f2.8 macro, Tokina 17mm f4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Never mind Tomioka was OEM suplier in Japan, they are good one but surely not the best. Best ones I think Carl Zeiss, Leica, Konica , Nikkor etc.Tomioka just right after them or in same focal length perhaps same. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008 Posts: 2475 Location: South West UK
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
Mal - thanks for the information - the pictures in particular. You will understand why I'm interested. Here's a lens I obtained only yesterday
I set the rings to try and match the alignment on your picture. They appear to be very close. Unfortunately my lens doesn't have the magic name on it. _________________ John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 1:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
John,
Sorry I'm only coming back to you now, but I've just seen your reply and photos.
Wow! It could - for all intents and purposes - be the same lens, apart from the missing name. I'm waiting for a 'blind bid' f/1.9 variation of this lens to come in the post - described as being Tomioka - but will need typewritten proof
Thank you for sharing your own experience - hopefully these situations will only add to our overall knowledge.
sichko wrote: |
Mal - thanks for the information - the pictures in particular. You will understand why I'm interested. Here's a lens I obtained only yesterday
I set the rings to try and match the alignment on your picture. They appear to be very close. Unfortunately my lens doesn't have the magic name on it. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tenbear8
Joined: 24 Dec 2008 Posts: 7 Location: Chattanooga Tennessee
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 2:15 am Post subject: Chinon |
|
|
Tenbear8 wrote:
I have a Chinon 135 2.8..m42 .A 6.50 investment that does far better than I thought it would. It say's Auto Chinon on the front but also has a GAF badge on it as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 7:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
I also have a Porst 55/1.4 coming in the mail. Another Tomioka? I find many of these so-called Tomioka lens having an amazing look on the web... or maybe Im getting suckered by the skill of the photog? _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
A G Photography
Joined: 11 May 2008 Posts: 1480 Location: Bologna - Italy
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
A G Photography wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
I also have a Porst 55/1.4 coming in the mail. Another Tomioka? I find many of these so-called Tomioka lens having an amazing look on the web... or maybe Im getting suckered by the skill of the photog? |
They have an amazing look also printed
I mean maybe these aren't at par with Zeiss, Leika, etc, but they are very characteristic, especially the bokeh wide open, and it's easy to create wild pictorial effects with them. Considering they usually sell pretty cheap it's a sin not owning one _________________ Alessandro
My Photography Website
My Blog about Photography and Italian Cuisine
My Photostream on Flickr
--------------------------------------------------------
DSLR: Nikon d80, Olympus e410
SLR: Chinon CX, Fujica ST605n, Nikon f601, Pentacon FM, Pentax Spotmatic SPII, Praktica FX, Praktica FX2, Voigtlander VST1, Yashica FX-3, Zeiss Contaflex
RF: Altissa Altix, Zorki Ie, Kiev 4b
Medium Format: Pentacon Six TL, Zeiss Ikonta 520/2, Mockba 4, Voigtlander Bessa I, Agfa Isolette II, Agfa Isola
Large Format: Cambo SC 4x5, Rodenstock Sinaron 150/5.6, Rodenstock Rodagon 150/5.6, Schneider Kreuznach Symmar 180/5.6
Lenses
Nikkors: 28/3.5 AIS, 35/2, 50/1.8, 50/2 H, Micro 55/3.5, Micro 60/2.8, 85/1.8, 135/3.5 AI, 200/4 NAI, 18-55/3.5-5.6, 28-80/3.5-5.6, 55-200/4-5.6
CY: Distagon 28/2.8, Planar 50/1.4, Yashika 50/1.7, Sonnar 135/2.8
CZJ m42-Exakta: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Tessar 40/4.5, Tessar 50/2.8, Pancolar 50/1.8, Pancolar 50/2, Biotar 58/2, Biotar 75/1.5, Tessar 80/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5, Sonnar 135/4, Triotar 135/4
CZJ P6: Flektogon 50/4, Flektogon 65/2.8, Biometar 80/2.8, Biometar 120/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Meyer-Pentacon: Orestegon 29/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Lydith 30/3.5, Primagon 35/4.5, Helioplan 40/4.5, Domiplan 50/2.8, Primotar 50/3.5, Oreston 50/1.8, Primoplan 58/1.9, Orestor 100/2.8, Trioplan 100/2.8, Helioplan 135/4.5, Orestor 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, Primotar 135/3.5, Primotar 180/3.5, Telemegor 180/5.5, Orestegor 200/4, Pentacon 200/4, Orestegor 300/4, Telemegor 300/4.5, Telemegor 400/5.5
Schneider-Kreuznach: Curtagon 28/4, Curtagon 35/2.8, Xenon 50/1.9, Xenar 50/2.8, Tele Xenar 135/3.5, Tele Xenar 200/4
Russians: Arsat Zodiak 30/3.5, Mir-I 37/2.8, Volna-9 50/2.8, Industar-50 50/3.5, Industar-61 50/2.8, Helios 44 58/2, Helios 44-2 58/2, Helios 44-M-4 58/2, Volna-3 80/2.8, Helios 40 85/1.5, Jupiter 9 85/2, Jupiter 11 135/4
Others: Chinon-Tomioka 55/1.4, Helios 28/2.8, Isco Iscotar 50/2.8, Konica Hexanon 40/1.8, Ludwig Meritar 50/2.9, Schacht Travegon 35/3.5, Schacht Travenon 135/4.5, Sekor 55/1.8, Sigma MF 28/2.8, S-Takumar, 28/3.5, S-Takumar 50/1.4, S-Takumar 55/1.8, S-Takumar 55/2, Steinheil Quinar 135/2.8, Steinheil Culminar 135/4.5, Vivitar 135/2.8, Voigtlander Ultron 50/1.8, Yashica Yashinon DX 50/1.4, Zuiko MC Auto-W 28/2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
no-X
Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 10:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
no-X wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
I also have a Porst 55/1.4 coming in the mail. Another Tomioka? I find many of these so-called Tomioka lens having an amazing look on the web... or maybe Im getting suckered by the skill of the photog? |
M42 version is at least based on optical design from Tomioka, possibly manufactured by Tomioka.
When Zeiss began cooperation with Tomioka, OEM lenses were not allowed to carry Tomioka logo, so there is a lot of Tomika lenses witnout Tomioka logo. But many 55/1.4 lenses, which aren't marked by Tomika logo, were manufactured by different makers and only used original optical design. There's probably no way to distinguish them... _________________ (almost) complete list of Helios lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PaulC
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 2318
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
PaulC wrote:
The 5D compatibility list here http://www.panoramaplanet.de/comp/ says the Porst 58 1.4 is likely not to work (at least at infinity focus) when mounted on the 5D.
It also seems from this list that the manufacturer can be identified from the type of ring grip. _________________ View or buy my photos at:
http://shutterstock.com/g/paulcowan |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
[quote="no-X"]
Bruce wrote: |
M42 version is at least based on optical design from Tomioka, possibly manufactured by Tomioka.
|
Yep... thats mine _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
I also have a Porst 55/1.4 coming in the mail. Another Tomioka? |
Me too - let's hope that we won't have to share the same lens! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
A G Photography wrote: |
I mean maybe these aren't at par with Zeiss, Leika, etc, but they are very characteristic, especially the bokeh wide open, and it's easy to create wild pictorial effects with them. Considering they usually sell pretty cheap it's a sin not owning one |
I still can't afford a Zeiss Planar 1.4/50 and probably won't be able to this year - I was tracking one up until I went away, when I left the bidding was at €65.00; arrived back home today and took a look...€201.00 with an hour to go, and all the additional bids were from the same guy
Talk about the left hand not knowing what the right hand is doing!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 2:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
Mal1905 wrote: |
Me too - let's hope that we won't have to share the same lens! |
My point exactly.... I think we are! _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Bruce wrote: |
Mal1905 wrote: |
Me too - let's hope that we won't have to share the same lens! |
My point exactly.... I think we are! |
Pleased to meet you Bruce |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonlinusson
Joined: 25 Jan 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 1:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jonlinusson wrote:
Hi!
I'm brand new to all of this (read: forums, manual focus lenses, and even my own camera)
and I'm confused. I bought a lovely lens which says:
Auto Chinon 1:1.4/55 Tomioka Japan
And it's great. Faboulous even. BUT:
It hits the mirror on my 5D! It wasn't suppose to do that. It hits when focusing at distances longer than 10m. I have a 5D Mark 2, is that why or should I use a different eos-m42 adapter? does anyone know?
I love the lens and it's a keeper but it freaks me out when it hits the mirror!
Second question: How "bad" is it that it hits the mirror? It's still usable and all I mean, using Live View the mirror goes up and then I can use it at infinity.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Hi Jon and welcome to the forum
Seems unusual that the Tomioka would hit the mirror on the 5D, but probably not impossible! I have the non-Tomioka branded version of this lens too, and that doesn't hit the 5D mirror either...
I speak of both the 'classic' 5D and the MkII - having used these lenses on both bodies recently.
My work-around for any mirror-hitting lenses was to use the Live View function when I had the MkII loaner - worry-free photography and no mirror damage
jonlinusson wrote: |
Hi!
I'm brand new to all of this (read: forums, manual focus lenses, and even my own camera)
and I'm confused. I bought a lovely lens which says:
Auto Chinon 1:1.4/55 Tomioka Japan
And it's great. Faboulous even. BUT:
It hits the mirror on my 5D! It wasn't suppose to do that. It hits when focusing at distances longer than 10m. I have a 5D Mark 2, is that why or should I use a different eos-m42 adapter? does anyone know?
I love the lens and it's a keeper but it freaks me out when it hits the mirror!
Second question: How "bad" is it that it hits the mirror? It's still usable and all I mean, using Live View the mirror goes up and then I can use it at infinity.. |
_________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jonlinusson
Joined: 25 Jan 2010 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 7:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
jonlinusson wrote:
Thank for your fast reply!
Just after I posted I found a thread here about m42 lense on the 5D2, guess I'm gonna go over there and read it thoroughly.
But, it COULD be the adapter then maybe? Well, in this case Live View is a lifesaver, it's not very often I use the lens att infinity anyway. But still! It bothers me |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Cobalt60
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 544 Location: Central Europe
|
Posted: Tue Jan 26, 2010 6:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cobalt60 wrote:
Just in case somebody is interested, I am currently selling the "twin brother" of this Chinon Tomioka lens, being the one labelled Revuenon Tomioka ...
you can find my offer in the marketplace. _________________ Visit the Yashica Information Site! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|