| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
dimitrygo
Joined: 01 Apr 2009
Posts: 561
|
 Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:02 am Post subject: |
 |
|
dimitrygo wrote:
| kuuan wrote: |
| dimitrygo wrote: |
| kuuan wrote: |
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
| I once owned an Osawa zoom that was an absolute stinker though! |
I got an Osawa f3.8 75-150mm Macro in a package deal.... |
I think this zoom was made by Tokina - I saw very similar one with Vivitar badge and s/n starting with 37. |
the Tokina and Osawa really look the same! There is little information on Osawa on the net, but from what I found Osawa was quite a big lens manufacturer too, made lenses for Mamiya SLRs and for Nikon, Pentax Canon, most under their own name Osawa but possibly also some which even were sold as e.g. "Nikkors"? ( see last comment: http://photo.net/filters-bags-tripods-accessories-forum/00Fxpe ) possibly it also was the demise of Osawa that led to Mamiya discontinuing it's SLR line: http://www.max.grenkowitz.net/?topic=1073
Just as Tokina Osawa never made it's own camera but lenses for other mounts, how can we know if it was Tokina that made this lens for Osawa, or if it possibly was Osawa that made it for Tokina? |
I think many brands were thought as lens producers but eventually turned out to be just resellers. Internet helps to reveal the truth. I don't claim Ozawa didn't made their own lenses but all Ozawa lenses I saw seem to be re-branded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008
Posts: 4569
Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
| Posted: Fri Jan 25, 2013 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
you are right, an identical looking Vivitar with serial starting 37 would be an indication that is was produced by Tokina.. Anyhow it should be mentioned that Osawa was a very big conglomerate which not only distributed but also produced a wide range of products, e.g. Bell&Howell and Mamiya lenses and cameras, that big that it's bankruptcy in 1984, at least then, had been considered the biggest company failure in modern Japanese history.
_________________
my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kendo1
Joined: 07 Dec 2012
Posts: 171
Location: Edinburgh
|
| Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kendo1 wrote:
Lens arrived today, 99p.
Just ordered another for 97p.
Waiting on adapters now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
zelda_n64
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 163
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Tue May 07, 2013 11:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
zelda_n64 wrote:
Just discovered this page as I was looking up something completely irrelevant.
The majority of my lens purchases are always under 5 pounds, although I have been known to spend up to £10.
All my current purchases which have been great bargains are on this page:
http://forum.mflenses.com/i-should-stop-buying-possibly-t58302.html
The best very recent purchase probably being the Carl Zeiss Jena Pancolar 50mm f1.8 which cost a whopping £3 ($4.66). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Well I might be super-unlucky but I monitor Ebay for lenses for almost one year and I have never managed to buy a really bargain one. Even the defective / damaged lenses which I watched ended up sold for over $30. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
| nandakoryaaa wrote: |
| Well I might be super-unlucky but I monitor Ebay for lenses for almost one year and I have never managed to buy a really bargain one. Even the defective / damaged lenses which I watched ended up sold for over $30. |
You should probably skip that red T* in search terms.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
| Pancolart wrote: |
| nandakoryaaa wrote: |
| Well I might be super-unlucky but I monitor Ebay for lenses for almost one year and I have never managed to buy a really bargain one. Even the defective / damaged lenses which I watched ended up sold for over $30. |
You should probably skip that red T* in search terms. |
 , my search terms are just "M42 lens", I check literally everything.
Seriously, I once have won a lens for just $1. But then the seller deleted his account so I got nothing.
I can consider my only bargain purchase of A.Schacht Ulm Travenar 35/3.5 for about $30 while it normally costs about $250, but just because it was in a rather bad condition. Aperture control was not working, coating is heavily damaged and the rear inner element is cracked. Still gives a surprisingly good picture but contrast is weak. I can participate with this lens here  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7576
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
nandakoryaaa. You need to pay opportunity cost on learning and searching for bargains.
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| nandakoryaaa. You need to pay opportunity cost on learning and searching for bargains. |
I feel sorry for being more off-topic here, but please can you explain what's this opportunity cost? Something I've never heard of. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7576
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| nandakoryaaa wrote: |
| calvin83 wrote: |
| nandakoryaaa. You need to pay opportunity cost on learning and searching for bargains. |
I feel sorry for being more off-topic here, but please can you explain what's this opportunity cost? Something I've never heard of. |
Sorry for my poor English, I should use 'time and efforts' instead of the term 'opportunity cost'. Gavin have mentioned in the reply above.
| Quote: |
you just have to look for a lens that pops up and very few people know what it is. I read all the posts here and eventually
you will come to know who made what. I have gathered a lot of information from here and has helped me a great deal.
Keep reading and looking and you will find them |
_________________
The best lens is the one you have with you.
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Oh thanks! I think I understood what opprotunity cost is |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mos6502
Joined: 20 Jun 2011
Posts: 960
Location: Austin
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 5:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mos6502 wrote:
If you search for M42 you won't find much. People who know what "M42" means, know what they're selling. And people who know what "M42" means, know what they're buying too! Few people selling know what they have, everbody buying knows what they're looking for.
Sometimes you just have to know specifically what you're looking for. Yashinon, Takumar, Tessar, etc. Because the seller will just write what's written on the lens. They might not even write the focal length! It also pays to check a seller's other auctions. I once scored several hard to find lenses because a seller listed a Domiplan... I looked under their other listings and found Schacht and Schneider lenses - all miss-spelled and impossible for people to find by just using the search bar! 
That being said it is very hard to find even the crappiest of lenses these days for under $10. Unless it is in some odd mount for which adapters are not available. I once got a Lithagon for a song because the seller left a Miranda to M42 adapter on the lens - nobody bid because they thought it was a lens for a Miranda instead of an adaptable M42 lens. So I got the lens and the adapter (which is desirable BTW) for almost nothing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Now I understand. I changed my search strategy and I already see some lenses that cost near $5. However I don't want them but the road is clear now, thanks alot |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
philslizzy
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4745
Location: Cheshire, England
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
philslizzy wrote:
I look at almost everything too. I have my own search system which works well for me. I just won a vintage camera for 55p yes - £0.55 and I have had several bargains lately. Some badly listed items are unsold and re-listed despite their low start price. There are several websites out there that look for badly listed items for you.
_________________
Hero in the 'messin-with-cameras-for-the-hell-of-it department'. Official. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 7794
Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Look on the lens sales here at MF Lenses 'Marketplace' - there's plenty of cheaper lenses, and they will almost certainly be described accurately. And most of us are open to offers for what we sell.
Which country do you live in?
_________________
LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2014 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
| Lloydy wrote: |
| Which country do you live in? |
me? I'm from Russia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012
Posts: 1318
Location: Conwy N Wales
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 10:00 pm Post subject: Still possible to get a 99p lens! |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
Now awaiting the arrival of this curiosity :
Click here to see on Ebay
Will keep you posted
_________________
pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2014 11:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
Well I've just won a seemingly fine 135/3.5 lens for $0.99 but the shipping is $8.5, will that count? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Langstrum
Joined: 16 Feb 2014
Posts: 351
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Langstrum wrote:
| nandakoryaaa wrote: |
| Well I've just won a seemingly fine 135/3.5 lens for $0.99 but the shipping is $8.5, will that count? |
The rule changed, you can exclude the shipping fee
I got a CZ Jena Tessar 2,8/50, exaktar mount with $6.8 but it's definitely not a rubbish lens, is it counted? 
_________________
Camera: Sony A7 mark III, A6300
AF Lenses:
Canon EF 50/1.8; EF 200/2.8 L, EF 200/1.8 L, EF 300/4 L Sony E mount SEL 50/1.8 OSS, SEL 16/2.8 Fuji X mount XF 35/1.4 R
MF Lenses: Peleng MC 8/3.5, 17/2.8 Samyang 14/T3.1, 35/T1.5, TS 24/3.5 ED, 85/T1.5, Polar 85/1.4 Auto Revuenon 28/2.8; MC 50/1.4 Vega11U 50/2.8 Carl Zeiss Tessar 50/2.8 (exakta mount) Auto Chinon 50/1.9 Zenitar ME1 50/1.7 Sears Auto Sears 55/1.4; Sears 135/2.8 Auto Yashinon DX 50/1.4; Tomioka 50/1.2 SMC Pentax 50/1.7; 50/1.4 Canon FD 50/1.4 S.S.C; 55/1.2 S.S.C; FD 50/1.2 L; FD 85/1.2 L; 85/1.2 S.S.C Aspherical; FD 80-200/4 L 300/2.8 S.S.C Fluorite FD 300/2.8 L FD 200/1.8 LCosina-S 50/1.2 Helios Helios 44 Chrome f/22, 44-2, 44-3, 44M-4, 44M-7 (58/2), Helios-40 85/1.5 Jupiter Jupiter-9 85/2; Jupiter-37A 135/3.5; Jupiter-21M 200/4 Nikon Ai 105/2.5 Tairs-3S 300/4.5
Voigtlander 15/4.5 Aspherical; Ultron 35/1.7
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
I have also bought a Mamiya Sekor 58mm f/1.7 for $3.95, but it is broken. Not usual malfunction like "fungus, aperture doesn't close", but really broken in two pieces and aperture is destroyed. So I don't know yet if I will be able to revive it.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Mamiya-Sekor-58mm-f-1-7-Prime-Lens-AS-IS-For-Parts-/131314813759 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JJB
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 424
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJB wrote:
I just bought a YUS 135mm 2.8 on ebay for $.99 plus shipping. I'll report back with images when it arrives. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
nandakoryaaa
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 95
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nandakoryaaa wrote:
| JJB wrote: |
| I just bought a YUS 135mm 2.8 on ebay for $.99 plus shipping. I'll report back with images when it arrives. |
I always wonder what makes people sell lenses for $0.99?
Is it even worth going to post office?
Maybe they make some money from the shipping cost? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JJB
Joined: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 424
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2014 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JJB wrote:
Ugh, it looks like a real challenge!
If it can't be rescued, I have seen the Mamiya Sekor 50/2 going quite cheaply on ebay. I just picked one up as part of a lot and so far the test shots show promise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marcusBMG
Joined: 07 Dec 2012
Posts: 1318
Location: Conwy N Wales
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marcusBMG wrote:
My mystery 200mm has arrived and it is indeed a bit of an enigma. As you can see the name plate has no id or serial number. The mount is PK and the black painted nature of it is typical (though not necessarily) of a lens produced from a M42 predecessor at the time of PK introduction ie mid 1970's.
The only lens that looks somewhat similar from a bit of browsing is a vivitar 200mm f4.
The lens looks in remarkably good nick - unused! However the aperture has problems: iris is sticky (but can't see any oil on it) and the aperture lever doesn't work. I'll try using it on my G1 first. Looks like it's Ok actually from some snaps with flash of mantlepiece ornaments...
Specs: filter: 58mm; cfd: 2.5m; length: ~108mm at infinity focus; iris: 6 blades.
Working hypothesis: this was a quality reject but somehow made it out into the world..... WDYT?
 
_________________
pentax ME super (retired)
Pentax K3-ii; pentax K-S2; Samsung NX 20; Lumix G1 + adapters;
Adaptall collection (proliferating!) inc 200-500mm 31A, 300mm f2.8, 400mm f4.
Primes: takumar 55mm; smc 28mm, 50mm; kino/komine 28mm f2's, helios 58mm, Tamron Nestar 400mm, novoflex 400mm, Vivitar 135mm close focus, 105mm macro; Jupiter 11A; CZJ 135mm.
A classic zoom or two: VS1 (komine), Kiron Zoomlock... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008
Posts: 3705
Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
That is COSINA made lens. Its little brother would be more known MC Cosinon-T 3.5/135mm PK bayonet.
_________________
---------------------------------
The Peculiar Apparatus Of Victorian Steampunk Photography: 100+ Genuine Steampunk Camera Designs https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0B92829NS |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
