Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135mm f4 lens in Praktina on E-M5

SXR_Mark · Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England

Carl Zeiss Jena Triotar 135mm f4 lens in Praktna mount tested on Olympus OM-D E-M5

Focal Length = 135mm
Max Aperture = F4
Min aperture = F22
Pre-set control with half stops between F4 and F11
Min Focus distance is under 1.2m (pretty good for a 135mm)
Optical scheme: Triplet, 3 lenses in 3 groups
Filter thread = 49mm
Mount = Praktina breechlock bayonet
Weight = 450g excluding caps
Length = 142mm unmounted without caps.

I won this lens in rough condition for £13.73 including delivery. Given the condition of the lens (very dirty and with fungus spots) this was hardly a bargain price. It could have been complete junk. These days, anything old with Zeiss on it commands a premium, even a tatty triplet lens in an obscure mount. Fortunately, the glass has cleaned up very well indeed with no detectable damage from the fungus and just a few very feint scratches on the front glass. The aluminium body has many surface scuffs but has polished up quite well. It looks better in reality than it does in the pictures below.

My homemade Praktina to micro-4/3 mount follows my normal practice of marrying the front of a teleconverter to a (in this case) L39 to m4/3 adapter, machining the two to get the correct overall length. I think the lens looks good on the E-M5.

The Triotar is a large lens. the filter rim is about 180mm from the image plane at infinity focus. Definitely not a telephoto lens! The size makes it handle quite well on the E-M5, though the equivalent focal length of 270mm means this is not a lens suited to hand holding.

You will find plenty of Triotar reports on this forum. Mine is possibly the first Praktina mount used on digital body (not that the mount will make any difference to the lens performance). It' is generally considered to be sharp for a triplet with good three-dimensional rendering.

Due to the horrible weather recently, I have not been able to test the lens thoroughly. From the tests I have been able to do I think sharpness is good but not exceptional at F4. It improves only very slightly at F5.6. One cannot expect super-sharp images from a triplet though. The key thing is that it does render very nicely. Contrast seems to be good as well (but note I used a good sized hood and shot with the sun behind me). Of course, a levels tweak helps but this can be said of almost any lens.

You can see subtle red and green halos around edges that are in front of and behind the point of focus, but these are not ugly or distracting. There is no obvious fringing at the focus.

All the following were taken at F4 with the camera mounted on a tripod

100% Crop from above, showing good but not outstanding sharpness.

100% Crop from above

SXR_Mark · Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 506 Location: England

I did some shots with a small (approx 11mm) extension tube to enable closer focus. Sharpness does suffer, as expected, but the results are still attractive.

Again, all these are at F4.

std · Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria

I have the same lens in Exakta mount and i think it's a good one.
My samples do look better but this could be because of better light.

Like they say the Triotar has very good 3d and very good sharpness, the only drawback is that it''s not so compact as the 4/135 Sonnar.
I have got yourself a very nice lens at a very good price.

etorix · Joined: 05 Oct 2014 Posts: 209 Location: London, England

shame i cant see these example pics anymore

my ol' Rolleicord has a Triotar

despite its scratches it was a good performer ..

philslizzy · Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 4744 Location: Cheshire, England