View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:31 pm Post subject: C/Y Carl Zeiss 85mm f2.8 or Nikon 85mm f1.8? |
|
|
wilco wrote:
Hi,
I am reader most of the time in the forum and I am so tempted to try Zeiss old lenses after seeing photos in this forum.
Since I only have nikon body (D200) it is very limited for me to try M42 mount because of no infinity.
Recently I saw C/Y mount zeiss can convert to F mount with infinity (Leitax) and I am itchy to try C/Y Zeiss 85mm f2.8.
My question here is Zeiss is better than Nikon 85mm f1.8? If some one can share opinion, it would be great help to me. The pricing is not much difference for the two lens.
Rgds,
Wilco
-------------------------------------
English is not my main language. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
karabud
Joined: 11 Apr 2009 Posts: 843 Location: Lodz
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
karabud wrote:
On a budget i can suggest you to buy Samyang/Falcon/Rokinon 85/1.4 it`s better than N85 1.8 af . I sold this lens because i bought Planar 85/1.4 - but i know that this lens(falkon, samyang, rokinon etc) is better than N85 1.8 AF...85 2.8 for my purposes is too dark. _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/atheist_lenses/
old
http://www.flickr.com/photos/piotr_p/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Wed Jun 16, 2010 10:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilco wrote:
karabud wrote: |
On a budget i can suggest you to buy Samyang/Falcon/Rokinon 85/1.4 it`s better than N85 1.8 af . I sold this lens because i bought Planar 85/1.4 - but i know that this lens(falkon, samyang, rokinon etc) is better than N85 1.8 AF...85 2.8 for my purposes is too dark. |
Thanks for your advice. You have nice collection of Zeiss.. I wish I can afford 85mm f1.4 planner.
-------------------------------------
English is not my main language. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ersatz
Joined: 29 May 2010 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
ersatz wrote:
The Samyang/Rokinon/ et al 85/1.4 is a nice lens that is sharp wide open, or at least doesn't get much sharper stopped down. Bokeh is nice and smooth too and color rendition is good. I think the Contax is sharper at any given focal length and becomes more apparent the more you stop down. The bokeh isn't great and it's not very good at MFD. That is where the Samyang and it's clones excel. It depends on what you want to use the lens for as both are good but for different reasons. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bruce
Joined: 15 Jan 2008 Posts: 842 Location: Boston, Ma USA
Expire: 2014-11-22
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bruce wrote:
I have the Nikkor 85/1.8 K and its one hell of a lens. I swear it's IQ reminds me of the Zeiss; its got that pop! I havent bought the C/Y 85 Planar or Sonnar because of it. The 85 represents a big hole in my Contax collection; its a quandry I can live with, temporarily, after shooting this Nikkor. _________________ Digital: Canon 40d & 5DmkII, Film: Hasselblad 203fe/Zeiss 80/2.8 cfe
Adapters for EOS: Cy; M42; Zenit39; Exakta; LeicaR; OlympusOM; PK; Nikon; Rollei35; Retina; Adaptal; P-6
Last edited by Bruce on Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008 Posts: 1387 Location: Berlin, DE
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 7:00 am Post subject: Re: C/Y Carl Zeiss 85mm f2.8 or Nikon 85mm f1.8? |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
wilco wrote: |
My question here is Zeiss is better than Nikon 85mm f1.8? If some one can share opinion, it would be great help to me. The pricing is not much difference for the two lens. |
Depends on which Nikkor 85/1.8 you have in mind. I have a "K" version, the really od pre-Ai one, and it's a very capable performer. The Sonnar 85/2.8 is superb; its contrast is extreme, and its rendering is smooth but not distractingly so. The Sonnar is capable of producing the most "3D" looking pictures I've seen. That having said, you would only be able to modify MM versions of the Sonnar to fit your Nikon camera (AE versions are usually cheaper).
Sonnar 85/2.8
Nikkor (K) 85/1.8
_________________ List of lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wilco
Joined: 15 Mar 2009 Posts: 135
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
wilco wrote:
Thanks for very nice sample picture aoleg.
-------------------------------------
English is not my main language. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Hari
Joined: 29 Nov 2009 Posts: 1790
Expire: 2015-05-27
|
Posted: Thu Jun 17, 2010 8:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hari wrote:
Question: is it possible to convert the AE to Nikon mount? Leitex conversion?
I have an MM and two AE's. I ordered a leitax mount for the MM but am not too sure about the AE's.
On a side note:
I got a chinese adapter with infinity glass and my advice: LAY OFF!
After spending a bucket on a good body and a small fortune on the lens, dont cheap out on the adapter.
I'll post some pix later so you see what I mean _________________
Analogue Rangefinders: Leica M5, Leica M6 Titanium classic 0.72, Leica M7 0.58, Leica M7 0.85
Digital Rangefinder: Leica M9, Leica Monochrom, Leica M240
SLR: Leica R3 electronic, Canon AE1P
DSLR: Canon 5D MK2
M mount Lenses: Super-Wide Heliar 15/f4.5 ASPH. + Leica 24/f3.8 ASPH + Leica 28/f2 ASPH. + Leica 35/f1.4 ASPH. FLE + Leica Noctilux 50/f0.95 + Leica Noctilux 50/f1 + Canon 50/f1.2 LTM + Leica 50/f1.4 ASPH. + Leica 50/f1.5 + Zeiss ZM Sonnar 50/f1.5 + Leica APO Summicron 50/f2 + Leica Summitar 50/f2 + Leica Rigid Summicron 50/f2 + Zeiss ZM Planar 50/f2 + Leica 50/f2.8 E39 + Leica 75/f1.4 + Leica APO 75/f2 ASPH. + Voigtlander 75/f2.5 + Leica Summarex 85/f1.5 + Leica APO 90/f2 ASPH. + Leica 90/f2 E55 + Leica 90/f2.8 + Leica APO 135/f3.4
Leica R mount Lenses: Leica-R 60/2.8 E55 + Leica-R 80/1.4 E67 + Leica-R 180/4
EF mount Lenses: Canon 50/1.8 II
M42 mount Lenses: Too many
My pictures: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dementedjesus/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ersatz
Joined: 29 May 2010 Posts: 45
|
Posted: Fri Jun 18, 2010 3:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
ersatz wrote:
The general consensus is that AE won't work with the leitax conversion. I've seen one person claim otherwise and said you could but it involved qutie a bit of grinding. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|