Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Bokeh Only!
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

calvin83 wrote:

I think most people here don't shot 'bokeh only' photos. May be you can open another thread called 'Out of Focus'. Wink


I can't tell if you are trolling, so I will just reply in a straight way.

Bernardhas started this thread specifically to explore the forced limitation of shooting photos that are completely out of focus. This has made the thread a wonderfully inventive and inspiring collection of photos, for quite a long time. (Start reading the thread from the start and see for yourself. )

Lately people have started to misinterpret the thread by posting normal photos showing off pleasing bokeh. Specifically NOT the point of this thread!! There are dozens of standard bokeh threads out there already. There are no other threads like this one.

This thread was a miracle, but is now being massively derailed and devalued because people just look at the latest photo and just assume it's about showing off bokeh.

It would be a shame to abandon a thread that has become a great collection of inspiring and original images because people misinterpreted it and have started posting off topic photos.

A situation that can easily be fixed by changing the thread title.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the name of title is precise and there is no need to change it. If it is not, then there will be some non-qualified photos at the first pages.

If we want to keep the photos within the theme, one way to do is cleaning up the thread, moving the non-qualified photos to another thread(as I suggested) and restate the requirements to fit this thread(you have did this part).


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SMC Pentax-M 2.8/100mm f = 2.8



PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 3:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Lol. I give up.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Come on people lets bring it back for rudolfkremers




PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 6:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asahi Pentax Super-Takumar 50mm f1,4

Somewhere in the city by Zoran Rodic, on Flickr


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 10:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I love you guys. All of you.


PostPosted: Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pancolar 50mm f1.8



PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

LOL! I think that follow up post of nice image with bokeh was a light-hearted jab to not take it so seriously.
Smile

Thread can be easily fixed after all. If I am guilty of a post I'll delete any not meant for here.
But an admin should modify the thread title, with a defining statement.

BTW, that city traffic shot is wonderful!!


PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 1:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

ZoranR wrote:
Asahi Pentax Super-Takumar 50mm f1,4

Somewhere in the city by Zoran Rodic, on Flickr


Great photograph- like little bubbles of light spilling out of a cup.
Svaka cast : )


PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Super-Takumar 50mm 1.4






PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

BeardsAreBest wrote:
Pancolar 50mm f1.8



I really like that blur rendition, might have to find myself a cheap praktica body with a Pancolar. Just missed out last week...
Great shot.


PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 2:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Tamron 90 /2.5



PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 6:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

@StillSanj @WNG555

Hvala! Thanks!


PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

edited

Last edited by bernhardas on Mon Jun 13, 2016 6:41 am; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 9:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah zoran!!
love it!


PostPosted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 7:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Pentacon 50 f1.8



Minolta 50 f/1.7



PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Carl Zeiss Jena Prakticar 80mm F1.8



PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 3:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Helios 44M-7 2/58mm



PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

At least it lasted a couple of post. Smile

Last edited by imagedit on Sat Jun 20, 2015 7:08 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 6:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

imagedit wrote:
At least it lased a couple of post. Smile


yes, at least Very Happy


PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 7:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Honestly does it really matter? or are we becoming a forum of purists? I think(hope) not Shocked


PostPosted: Fri Jun 19, 2015 8:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

imagedit wrote:
At least it lased a couple of post. Smile


LOL!
Very Happy


PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 7:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kryss wrote:
Honestly does it really matter? or are we becoming a forum of purists? I think(hope) not Shocked


Not sure if does matter or not, but imagedit post was fun Smile


PostPosted: Sat Jun 20, 2015 7:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Schneider Kreuznach 25mm f/1.5