Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Biotar 75mm f1.5 slim 1951
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 8:50 pm    Post subject: Biotar 75mm f1.5 slim 1951 Reply with quote

No pp straight convert from raw to jpg.


#1

#2

#3

#4

#6

#7

#8

#9

#10

#11


Last edited by Attila on Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:36 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The lighting on the #3, #8, and #9 are good. For the others it seems far too intense, washing her out. I think a little PP to level off that strong directional sun would go a long ways.


PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 9:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you Marc! Over exposed over burned pictures was part of plan I did try to make less common shoots.


PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
Thank you Marc! Over exposed over burned pictures was part of plan I did try to make less common shoots.


Oh ok. I understand. In my personal experience, I always found digital made overexposed pictures rather harsh looking but on film it seems softer and more delicate. Also on film they are more recoverable, if the overexposure wasn't intentional. This may have something to do with dynamic range of digital vs. film, I'm not sure. Maybe it's worth exploring more on film?


PostPosted: Fri Jul 20, 2012 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

More exploring never harm try to short it out , in my opinion too.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

#1


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nice. I like number 10, I like that composition with the path in background.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 9:45 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That lens looks incredibly sharp in No's 8 and 9 Shocked


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 10:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

What a lens Shocked ....your wife is for sure a beautiful lady and she deserves the best lenses Very Happy ...
#3 and #9 for me but I'm not a big fan from the overexposed shots ....


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SonicScot wrote:
That lens looks incredibly sharp in No's 8 and 9 Shocked

Sharpest lens what I known in this focal length even at wide open.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Attila wrote:
SonicScot wrote:
That lens looks incredibly sharp in No's 8 and 9 Shocked

Sharpest lens what I known in this focal length even at wide open.

was that both shots wide open?


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 1:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

on the properly exposed shots the lens exhibits some interesting characteristics and goos sharoness. i have never heard of this lens. what mount s it? what kind of price does it bring? could you show a picture of it?
tony


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

pich900 wrote:
Attila wrote:
SonicScot wrote:
That lens looks incredibly sharp in No's 8 and 9 Shocked

Sharpest lens what I known in this focal length even at wide open.

was that both shots wide open?


No it was stopped down, but basically same sharp at all aperture.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 2:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rbelyell wrote:
on the properly exposed shots the lens exhibits some interesting characteristics and goos sharoness. i have never heard of this lens. what mount s it? what kind of price does it bring? could you show a picture of it?
tony


I am pretty sure you heard of it already, nowadays go around 1000 USD.

Some more shoots taken by this lens.
http://forum.mflenses.com/carl-zeiss-jena-biotar-1-5-7-5cm-slim-model-1951-t37736,highlight,%2Bbiotar+%2B7+%2B5cm.html

In middle of top row



PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

yes, thank you. it was the 'slim' version that threw me off.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

slim and fat and pre-war these free type made. M42, Exakta, Praktina mount what I know.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

thanks. a wonderful lens in any size...


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 6:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

rbelyell wrote:
thanks. a wonderful lens in any size...


I agree, a very few eastern lens did rich this success.


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:51 pm    Post subject: Re: Biotar 75mm f1.5 slim 1951 Reply with quote

Wonderful model and a great lens indeed Attila! [I agree with Marc, the light is too harsh and
turn to burn out highlights (in my opinion)]


PostPosted: Sat Jul 21, 2012 7:59 pm    Post subject: Re: Biotar 75mm f1.5 slim 1951 Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
Wonderful model and a great lens indeed Attila! [I agree with Marc, the light is too harsh and
turn to burn out highlights (in my opinion)]


Yes, this is part of play , need to get more experience where is optimal. I like some of overburned shoot pretty much , like first two.