View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Tariq0101
Joined: 28 Jul 2021 Posts: 25 Location: Syria
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 1:10 am Post subject: Auto Sears 55mm f1.4, extremely nisen bokeh. |
|
|
Tariq0101 wrote:
I know that this kind of busy bokeh is hated around here for some reason. I kinda like it, especially recently with the iphone portrait mode producing very creamy artificial bokeh so I think that I'm just sick of that because I see it literally everywhere.
Maybe the bokeh would look ugly in nature around trees but in the night it looks nice imo.
Just wanted to point out the nisen bokeh this lens produce so if you don't like that, don't buy it.
[/code] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
55
Joined: 13 May 2013 Posts: 717 Location: U.S.
Expire: 2022-06-15
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 2:10 am Post subject: Re: Auto Sears 55mm f1.4, extremely nisen bokeh. |
|
|
55 wrote:
Tariq0101 wrote: |
I know that this kind of busy bokeh is hated around here for some reason. I kinda like it, especially recently with the iphone portrait mode producing very creamy artificial bokeh so I think that I'm just sick of that because I see it literally everywhere.
Maybe the bokeh would look ugly in nature around trees but in the night it looks nice imo.
Just wanted to point out the nisen bokeh this lens produce so if you don't like that, don't buy it.
[/code] |
Welcome, Tariq0101.
You won't hear me complain about the rendering in your photo. I think it's nice!
If you have any more photos to share, I'd enjoy seeing them.
(Now that you've made an initial post, photos will show in your succeeding posts.) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jamaeolus
Joined: 19 Mar 2014 Posts: 2968 Location: Eugene
Expire: 2015-08-20
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
jamaeolus wrote:
_________________ photos are moments frozen in time |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 6005 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2021 3:53 am Post subject: Re: Auto Sears 55mm f1.4, extremely nisen bokeh. |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Tariq0101 wrote: |
I know that this kind of busy bokeh is hated around here for some reason. I kinda like it, especially recently with the iphone portrait mode producing very creamy artificial bokeh so I think that I'm just sick of that because I see it literally everywhere.
Maybe the bokeh would look ugly in nature around trees but in the night it looks nice imo.
Just wanted to point out the nisen bokeh this lens produce so if you don't like that, don't buy it.
[/code] |
Just because some express dislike for this kind of bokeh doesn't mean that all dislike it.
In your image making there is no-one that you have to please but yourself, so make your images and feel free to share them.
All creative souls are welcome here.
Thank you for sharing this one
Tom |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tariq0101
Joined: 28 Jul 2021 Posts: 25 Location: Syria
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 12:07 am Post subject: Re: Auto Sears 55mm f1.4, extremely nisen bokeh. |
|
|
Tariq0101 wrote:
55 wrote: |
Welcome, Tariq0101.
You won't hear me complain about the rendering in your photo. I think it's nice!
If you have any more photos to share, I'd enjoy seeing them.
(Now that you've made an initial post, photos will show in your succeeding posts.) |
Thanks for the warm welcome. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tariq0101
Joined: 28 Jul 2021 Posts: 25 Location: Syria
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 12:13 am Post subject: Re: Auto Sears 55mm f1.4, extremely nisen bokeh. |
|
|
Tariq0101 wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Just because some express dislike for this kind of bokeh doesn't mean that all dislike it.
In your image making there is no-one that you have to please but yourself, so make your images and feel free to share them.
All creative souls are welcome here.
Thank you for sharing this one
Tom |
Thanks for the reply, I fully agree with you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11028 Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 12:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome Tariq0101! Good to see you here!
Thank you also for the term nisen bokeh I didn't know it before.
According to the definition of nisen bokeh at https://www.imaging-resource.com/news/2014/05/02/the-end-of-onion-ring-bokeh-panasonic-beats-the-curse-of-aspheric-lenses your image does not have nisen bokeh. I like to call light spheres like yours "out-of-focus highlights". _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ultrapix
Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 570 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Well, I started to like Leica lenses mainly for their "busy" bokeh, and got bored with them when they stopped to show that personality...
So, to each his own. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
HansMoleman
Joined: 12 Jul 2019 Posts: 158 Location: MD USA
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2021 1:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HansMoleman wrote:
Subject and background are well chosen in the image up top. Nice. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|