View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:24 pm Post subject: Attn. Nemesis 101 - Regarding Vivitar 70-150 f3.8 |
|
|
revers wrote:
Quote: |
Yes I have both too - the two ring as a Vivitar on a Konica mount, the single on a Canon bayonet mount.
Both are excellent, I just wish I had one I could hook up to one of the digital SLR's I have, but the easiest for those are M42, or K mount...
Doug
|
I have one coming & wonder which model you prefer, as I have the option of buying the other.
Anyone else with an opinion? _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
I have the two ring one only.
I understand from others who have both that the one-ring version is a bit better.
Personally I like the two rings because that one ring always confuses me. Thats pure personal preseference though, I am quite primitive in general. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Big Dawg
Joined: 28 Jan 2009 Posts: 2530 Location: Thach Alabama
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Big Dawg wrote:
Both are good. I prefer my "two touch" one for close work and the "one touch" for longer shots and portraits. Not that one is that much greater than the other. Actually they are both quite exceptional. I think you'll like yours. _________________ Big Dawg |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Excalibur
Joined: 19 Jul 2009 Posts: 5017 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-04-21
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:24 am Post subject: Re: Attn. Nemesis 101 - Regarding Vivitar 70-150 f3.8 |
|
|
Excalibur wrote:
revers wrote: |
Quote: |
Yes I have both too - the two ring as a Vivitar on a Konica mount, the single on a Canon bayonet mount.
Both are excellent, I just wish I had one I could hook up to one of the digital SLR's I have, but the easiest for those are M42, or K mount...
Doug
|
I have one coming & wonder which model you prefer, as I have the option of buying the other.
Anyone else with an opinion? |
Well I have the 2 touch (No 22) + matching multiplier and it is very good, the multiplier is VG on some other lenses, but on mine if I was to offer some criticism it would be that it doesn't seem as sharp at 150mm.....I also once had the Kiron one touch which is similar to the Vivitar and that was VG as well. _________________ Canon A1, AV1, T70 & T90, EOS 300 and EOS300v, Chinon CE and CP-7M. Contax 139, Fuji STX-2, Konica Autoreflex TC, FS-1, FT-1, Minolta X-700, X-300, XD-11, SRT101b, Nikon EM, FM, F4, F90X, Olympus OM2, Pentax S3, Spotmatic, Pentax ME super, Praktica TL 5B, & BC1, , Ricoh KR10super, Yashica T5D, Bronica Etrs, Mamiya RB67 pro AND drum roll:- a Sony Nex 3
.........past gear Tele Rolleiflex and Rollei SL66.
Many lenses from good to excellent. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
revers
Joined: 13 May 2010 Posts: 574 Location: In the country just north of Toronto Canada
|
Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
revers wrote:
Thanks guys.
I understand the two touch (what I have coming) is a bit heavier than the one touch & weight is a big factor on my G1. _________________ Ron
Olympus OM-D E-M5, 14-42 & 45/1.8.
Panasonic G1, GF1, 14-45, 45-200 & various legacy lenses.
Canon S5, Sony 1.7 Tele-converter & Raynox DCR 150 Macro converter. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|