View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 9:41 pm Post subject: Arco Tokyo Tele-Colinar 135mm f/3.8 |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
This lens is quite good and one of the sharpest 135mm I have (I have around fifty 135mm lenses). There is some slight mechanical vignetting in the corners on FF, but other than that, beautiful, well built lens with good IQ.
_________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6602 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Jan 06, 2015 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Ditto, I have two of them.
high quality item. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
mo
Joined: 27 Aug 2009 Posts: 8979 Location: Australia
Expire: 2016-07-30
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 12:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
mo wrote:
Beautiful samples and colors,and that's what I call a postie bike _________________ Moira, Moderator
Fuji XE-1,Pentax K-01,Panasonic G1,Panasonic G5,Pentax MX
Ricoh Singlex TLS,KR-5,KR-5Super,XR-10
Lenses
Auto Rikenon's 55/1.4, 1.8, 2.8... 50/1.7 Takumar 2/58 Preset Takumar 2.8/105 Auto Takumar 2.2/55, 3.5/35 Super Takumar 1.8/55...Macro Takumar F4/50... CZJ Biotar ALU M42 2/58 CZJ Tessar ALU M42 2.8/50
CZJ DDR Flektogon Zebra M42 2.8/35 CZJ Pancolar M42 2/50 CZJ Pancolar Exakta 2/50
Auto Mamiya/Sekor 1.8/55 ...Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 2.8/50 Auto Mamiya/Sekor 200/3.5 Tamron SP500/8 Tamron SP350/5.6 Tamron SP90/2.5
Primoplan 1.9/58 Primagon 4.5/35 Telemegor 5.5/150 Angenieux 3.5/28 Angenieux 3,5/135 Y 2
Canon FL 58/1.2,Canon FL85/1.8,Canon FL 100/3.5,Canon SSC 2.8/100 ,Konica AR 100/2.8, Nikkor P 105/2.5
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lightshow
Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3666 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 2:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Results look impressive, thanks for posting.
The body reminds me of a Canon RF lens. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010 Posts: 4713 Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
Posted: Wed Jan 07, 2015 3:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Yes, it is similar to the early Canons & Canon Serenars. Thx for commenting _________________ Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 661 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
I just finished a (cough) 'repair' on a copy of this lens. It certainly isn't in the same beautiful state as the one shown futher up thread, the finish is fairly tarnished by age. When I received it I noticed some separation in the cemented element. After successfully disassembling to get to the element, I tried heating and slight pressure to see if the Canada balsam might re-flow successfully. It did not, I tried several times. I was also unable to further disassemble the element despite the separation having spread across most of the surface area. To try to further disassemble the element I submerged it in acetone for the night. In the morning, the evidence of the separation was gone, the element would still not pull apart. My opinion is that the acetone washed the Canada balsam out from between the elements. Due to the manufacture it still would not come apart further. The element seems to be a triple cemented type, and the scheme 5/3.
On testing, the lens is sharp with good contrast even wide open. The pictures are a couple of test shots at center. The flower is a 100% crop, the cat a slightly less extreme crop. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
Nice results, I wonder if the separation was only in part of the element surface , and in case it was, after the acetone treatment and cleaning, did it left any border line where the separation was present? Do you think submerging the elements in acetone during the night ,would improve the separation to be less visible ? I've got couple of lenses with separation and still didn't touch em yet |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kiddo
Joined: 29 Jun 2018 Posts: 1273
|
Posted: Sat Apr 15, 2023 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kiddo wrote:
I understand that if there's still any separation visible in the borders of itself ,it would be visible in the bubbles bokeh like highlights etc.,right? But if acetone can cure these issues ,that would be really nice lol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 661 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 12:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
You might have to experiment to know for sure. In the past, heating has allowed me to fully disassemble cemented lenses, but the construction would not allow it in this instance. I'm still not sure whether the acetone completely removed the balsam, or re flowed it. I lean towards complete removal. There is now no visible trace of any separation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pabeu
Joined: 25 Apr 2018 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 11:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
pabeu wrote:
Alun, I am also interested in fixing separation on a couple of lenses.
Could you describe the heating process you used?
When effective, how do you put/glue the elements back together?
Thank you. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alun Thomas
Joined: 20 Aug 2018 Posts: 661 Location: New Zealand
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 10:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alun Thomas wrote:
To separate I've used 2 methods. One is to heat slowly to boiling in water, this limits the maximum temperature to ~100 degrees C, and the heating process is fairly smooth. This last time I just heated in the oven to about 120C. I recall seeing some info about the correct temperature to heat to, but can't recall now.
I've only reglued an element one time, I used a grade of araldite epoxy glue which was advertised as being optically clear. It worked quite well. You do have to be careful with regards to realignment of the two elements. I used the lens carrier to align them, lacking anything better. With that method you need to reglue, then be careful to remove any excess which squeezes out, I used a rag soaked in acetone to remove it. Then, after 30 minutes, I removed it from the carrier and repeated the cleaning process to remove any last bits and prevent it being stuck in the carrier.
The process is fraught with the high possibility of making mistakes, I generally only do it on lenses I'm prepared to lose if it doesn't work out. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pabeu
Joined: 25 Apr 2018 Posts: 72
|
Posted: Sun Apr 16, 2023 10:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pabeu wrote:
Thank you. Really valuable input. Have a great week. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|