| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nikon1User
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 71
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:33 am Post subject: Apollo 75/1.4 |
 |
|
Nikon1User wrote:
Last edited by Nikon1User on Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ForenSeil
Joined: 15 Apr 2011
Posts: 2726
Location: Kiel, Germany.
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 3:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
ForenSeil wrote:
Does it only focus that close?
Could you please post a pic of that lens?
_________________
I'm not a collector, I'm a tester 
My camera: Sony A7+Zeiss Sonnar 55/1.8
Current favourite lenses (I have many more):
A few macro-Tominons, Samyang 12/2.8, Noritsu 50.7/9.5, Rodagon 105/5.6 on bellows, Samyang 135/2, Nikon ED 180/2.8, Leitz Elmar-R 250/4, Celestron C8 2000mm F10
Most wanted: Samyang 24/1.4, Samyang 35/1.4, Nikon 200/2 ED
My Blog: http://picturechemistry.own-blog.com/
(German language) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nikon1User
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 71
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nikon1User wrote:
No, but it's midnight and my wife won't let me take photos of her. So it's the dog at an arm's length for tonight.
Here's one more, without flash but softer due to iso6400
This is the same lens:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/TV-Lens-75mm-C-Mount-F-1-4-Apollo-/251359740346?pt=Camera_Lenses&hash=item3a863541ba
g~~60_12.JPG)
On my Nikon V2
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7555
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
Congratulations! This is one of the better fast C mount lens commonly seen in Navitar/Computar brand . Get/make a hood for it as they are pretty prone to flare.
Flickr 上 cafemilkyway 的 Navitar 75mm f1.3 and Computar 75mm f1.4
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nikon1User
Joined: 10 Sep 2013
Posts: 71
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nikon1User wrote:
Thanks!! Have you noted any significant difference between the f1.3 and f1.4 versions?
I'm actually somewhat surprised to read that a hood is necessary, the glass seems fairly well recessed, but I will take that into consideration!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calvin83
Joined: 12 Apr 2009
Posts: 7555
Location: Hong Kong
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 4:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
calvin83 wrote:
| Nikon1User wrote: |
Thanks!! Have you noted any significant difference between the f1.3 and f1.4 versions?
I'm actually somewhat surprised to read that a hood is necessary, the glass seems fairly well recessed, but I will take that into consideration!! |
They should be the same lens with different markings...
_________________
https://lensfever.com/
https://www.instagram.com/_lens_fever/
The best lens is the one you have with you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
edz
Joined: 20 Aug 2009
Posts: 82
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 10:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
edz wrote:
| calvin83 wrote: |
| Get/make a hood for it as they are pretty prone to flare. |
The Takumar 135/2.5 200/4 hood fits quite nicely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
