Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
soikka wrote:
cilinderman wrote: |
WOW! Nice approach! Do you work there to be able to get so near? |
Perhaps it's due to the fact that 200mm is equal to 400mm in 35mm format . Well, seriously, they are still close... How was it possible?
Interesting shots! Those large watermarks are a turn-off though... _________________ DSLR: K-5,K20d+Grip, Ist*Ds
Film: MZ-5n, LX, MX+winder, SuperA+winder, ME Super,
M-series: 28/2.8, 35/2, 40/2.8, 135/3.5, 75-150/4, A-series: 50/1.7, Super-Taks: 55/1.8, 105/2.8, S-M-C Taks: 28/3.5, 50/1.4, 85/1.8, Sigma SW2 24/2.8, Tamron SPs: 90/2.5(I), 180/2.5, 500/8, Rikenon XR 35-70/3.5, Cosinon 40/2.5, F-1.7x AF-adapter, Olympus XA |