View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:05 am Post subject: A Word about Russian Serial Numbers |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
After reading through a great deal of the previous posts I noticed that there was a little discussion over the serial numbers of Russian lenses that start with 0, 00, or 000. As part of the yahoo zenit camera group we've come around to this topic more than once. I didn't know if anyone knew what they really meant so these were our findings. Alain Berry, a French ZCG group member gave these insights (translated by Martin Luerkens - another ZCG member):
000xxxxxx factory test (study) models (prototypes etc) modčles d'études
d'usine (prototypes etc..)
00xxxxxx preseries models reserved for members of the communist party
and "VIPs" (reservés aux membres du parti communist et haut
responsables en pré-série)
0xxxxxx reserved for factory syndicat leaders (réservés aux
responsables syndicaux d'usines)
They are in fact all pre-production models. They are generally considered higher quality optics due to the fact that there is stricter quality control (which is disputed among Russian gear), they are produced in lower numbers with greater care, and they are not presented to the general public. A great many members, with multiple copies of the helios 44-2, have invariably found the best to be the one with the 0xxxxx serial number. Whether there is really any difference between which pre-production model is the better has yet to be tested.
I always look for the lenses with pre-production serial numbers because there’s that chance that they might be better than those of mass-production lines.
Anyways I hope this was of some value
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 2:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Thanks Marc. This is an EXCELLENTLY INFORMATIVE contribution!!!!!
I have myself a few Russians beginning with zero numbers and in fact I was wondering how could that be possible for a lens bearing the writing "Made in USSR" to have a serial number implying a build in the year 2000!
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maxim
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 284 Location: Poland 52°N 17°E
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maxim wrote:
Thank you, Marc - that's interesting! I didn't know about this fact before I have a Russian portrait lens, Tair-11A with 004548 serial number... look at the photo:
Thanks once again,
Hubert _________________ Regards,
Hubert
E-300 + ZD 14-42 + Tessar 5cm/3.5 + Mamiya 55/1.4 + Primoplan V 58/1.9 + Biotar 5.8cm/2 + MC Helios 44M-6 58/2 + Trioplan 100/2.8 + Trioplan V 100/2.8 + "Olympia" Sonnar 180/2.8 + ЮПИТЕР-6 180/2.8 + Telemegor 400/5.5
www.galeria.kw.pl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Wow, this is a very nice lens that you have, Hubert!
The Tair-11A is said to be great and then this is a VIP-version.
Take good care!
Thanks for the info, Marc _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Maxim
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 284 Location: Poland 52°N 17°E
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maxim wrote:
LucisPictor - this Tair is in good hands, I use it with respect and care I have also an original leather case (looks like the Thermos flask) and set of filters. I am interested when my copy was produced... _________________ Regards,
Hubert
E-300 + ZD 14-42 + Tessar 5cm/3.5 + Mamiya 55/1.4 + Primoplan V 58/1.9 + Biotar 5.8cm/2 + MC Helios 44M-6 58/2 + Trioplan 100/2.8 + Trioplan V 100/2.8 + "Olympia" Sonnar 180/2.8 + ЮПИТЕР-6 180/2.8 + Telemegor 400/5.5
www.galeria.kw.pl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 29545 Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2007 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Funny, my Tair11A also begins with a double zero (004891).
- _________________ Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 2:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
Orio wrote: |
Funny, my Tair11A also begins with a double zero (004891).
- |
the communist party in Russia must have had many important party members
my recently acquired Mir 47K has the serial number 000238 _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
In the case of the Mir 47k, it may be that the lens was produced in 2000 rather than being a pre-production model. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuuan
Joined: 14 Jan 2008 Posts: 4569 Location: right now: Austria
Expire: 2014-12-26
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 7:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
kuuan wrote:
that would make sense..but considering that the lens looks VERY heavily used, as do all the 'old' camera stuff to be found in camera shops in Vietnam, I doubt that it is 'only' 9 years old _________________ my photos on flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/kuuan/collections |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008 Posts: 1705 Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
Seymore wrote: |
Well, my Jupiter 37a is a lowly 79xxx SN... and the MIR a 98xx |
Two very sweet lenses for sure - have never seen the Jupiter in a '00xx' serial though... _________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xpres
Joined: 11 Dec 2007 Posts: 964 Location: UK
Expire: 2014-10-28
|
Posted: Wed Jul 08, 2009 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Xpres wrote:
I wonder if there is any evidence for the '0' serial number stories? There seem to be an awful lot of '0xxx...' about..... _________________ Film... and sometimes SD14, 5D2 and some other suff! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jeff Zen
Joined: 17 Jun 2009 Posts: 262 Location: Northwest USA
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jeff Zen wrote:
Xpres wrote: |
I wonder if there is any evidence for the '0' serial number stories? There seem to be an awful lot of '0xxx...' about..... |
It could very well be more internet hot air, but I remember reading somewhere that Soviet manufacturers created different quality lenses for military, medical and scientific use than those mass produced for general public. It's pure speculation on my part, but that might explain why there are so many zero serial numbers. I am inclined to believe what Alain Berry has reported about the 0xxx... serial numbers, but it would be nice to know exactly what his sources were.
Last edited by Jeff Zen on Fri Jul 10, 2009 2:30 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
djmike
Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
Posted: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
My J-37A starts with 84xxxxx, J-9 with 83xxxxxx. _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3705 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:14 pm Post subject: MIR-1 serial |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
I am glad i found this debate. I have this very nice silver MIR-1. Coating has very strong purple color.
Serial number: 004221.
Can someone recognize producer from the photo (interesting symbol for coating).
©2009 Pancolart |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 12:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
Despite having the KMZ symbol, I had heard that the mir-1s were not actually produced by them, only assembled in the early days (1950s). It was only after that that some larger companies such as zomz and vologda took on full-scale production and started using their own logos.
Quite a rare piece; a very nice find!
~Marc
Last edited by themoleman342 on Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:07 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Pancolart
Joined: 04 Feb 2008 Posts: 3705 Location: Slovenia, EU
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pancolart wrote:
Thank's Marc. May i ask how come you're so into Russian optics? And if you can write your top 5 golden oldies lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
First and foremost I am a social and intellectual historian of the Soviet era, specifically the interwar period. Because I've always had an interest in the region and decided to invest a little money into a photography hobby (which has subsequently turned into an addiction), I decided to go with East German and Soviet optics. The price/quality ratio is truthfully what kept me buying, but I do prefer the characteristics I get from these over many of the Japanese lenses that I do have. I rarely buy lenses 'coldly' (without knowing their full background), so usually if someone asks about one that I do have (in this case the mir-1) I know a bit about it.
A top lens list is a toughie for me but I'll tell you what I end up bringing on outings:
Mir 10A 3.5/28
Mir 24m 2/35
Zenitar-M 1.7/50
Helios 44 2/58 (perhaps -2, but I'm liking the original more and more)
Jupiter 9 2/85
Tair 11A 2.8/135
I know that is one more than you asked but one has to have a full range of focal lengths, no? Keep in mind I still exclusively use film. The list may change slightly in the next several weeks, since I am expecting a Helios 40-2, wooo! I also have some favorites like the m39 mir-1 or industar 22, that are wonderful, but restrictive since I can't get infinity. So these I use in special circumstances when I know the upcoming conditions.
I really need to get to updating my "equipment" set on flickr which as of now, does not even reflect 1/5th of my collection.
~Marc |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JWH
Joined: 26 Aug 2009 Posts: 120 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
JWH wrote:
I am also very interested in the histories and stories behind lenses and I happen to have one interesting piece ( posted before ).
So the 000x says it may have been a prototype, is it known what the 0009141 might mean? I've heard something about production dates but I can't think of a date that has 9141 in it . I'm eager to find out what this might be because as a Prototype I wouldn't go with a serialnumber like that! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kram
Joined: 06 Feb 2010 Posts: 1344 Location: Portland, OR
|
Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 6:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kram wrote:
Been searching for a good Helios 44-2. Just bought this:
Feel free to call me Mr. Factory Syndicat Leader.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DTR
Joined: 20 Jan 2012 Posts: 4 Location: Finland
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
DTR wrote:
Hello everyone!
I bought a Tair-11A lens couple of days ago from internet auction. After that I have compared my lens to other ones found from the internet. Many of them have a serial number between 700000-900000 and my lens have number 002796. Is it really a pre-production model? It came with UV-filter, plastic end cap, metallic front cap and bakelite container. Here is the whole set: http://www.flickr.com/photos/68161454@N04/6709598763/in/photostream/
Edit: for some reason web-link and uploaded picture worked out fine on preview mode, but not now...? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
walter g
Joined: 20 Feb 2010 Posts: 2463 Location: NC, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
walter g wrote:
DTR wrote: |
Hello everyone!
I bought a Tair-11A lens couple of days ago from internet auction. After that I have compared my lens to other ones found from the internet. Many of them have a serial number between 700000-900000 and my lens have number 002796. Is it really a pre-production model? It came with UV-filter, plastic end cap, metallic front cap and bakelite container. Here is the whole set: http://www.flickr.com/photos/68161454@N04/6709598763/in/photostream/
Edit: for some reason web-link and uploaded picture worked out fine on preview mode, but not now...? |
_________________
Main cameras
Panasonic G5,Nikon J1,Pentax Q10,Sony Nex 6
Minolta MC W SI 2.5/28, MD 2.8/28, MC W SG 3.5/28, MC Celtic 3.5/28, MC W HG 2.8/35, MD Celtic 2.8/35, QE 4/35, Rokkor X 2/45, MC Rokkor X PG 1.4/50, MC Rokkor X PG 1.7/50, MD Rokkor X 1.7/50, MD 2/50, MC Rokkor PF 1.7/55, MC Rokkor PF 1.9/55, Auto Tele Rokkor PG 2.8/135, MC Tele Rokkor QD 3.5/135, TC 4/135, MC Celtic 4/200, MC Tele Rokkor PE 4.5/200
MD 28-70 f3.5-4.8, MD Macro 35-70 f3.5, Md 70-210 f4, MD Rokkor X 75-200 f4.5, MD 100-200 f5.6
Nikon Nikkor 4/20, O Auto 2/35, S Auto 1.4/50..... Miranda Auto 2.8/28, Auto 2.8/35, Auto 1.4/50, Auto EC 1.4/50, Auto 1.8/50, Auto EC 1.8/50,Auto 1.9/50, Auto 3.5/135
Various Soligor,Sun,Fujita,Komura,Spitatone, etc. Lenses
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
Xpres wrote: |
I wonder if there is any evidence for the '0' serial number stories? There seem to be an awful lot of '0xxx...' about..... |
Communist party was quiet big one party for 220 million people.
I have a couple of Industar-22 collepsible 5cm lens , all serial start with 7xxx and surely this lens not made in 197x years. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I am proud owner this 000 started lens, I had in past 3-4 other copies from this lens, black and silver. I kept this older ones , because I love possible oldest and this lens has different rendering than latest ones. According to Marc 000 description now I more proud about my lens.
_________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
themoleman342
Joined: 21 Oct 2007 Posts: 2190 Location: East Coast (CT), U.S.A.
Expire: 2013-01-24
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
themoleman342 wrote:
I think the rarest preseries lens that I have is the Industar 24m:
It never actually entered full-scale production. I can't accurately speak to production numbers but of the 5 I've seen, mine has the latest serial number. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
danfromm
Joined: 04 Sep 2011 Posts: 595
|
Posted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
danfromm wrote:
[quote="Attila"
I have a couple of Industar-22 collepsible 5cm lens , all serial start with 7xxx and surely this lens not made in 197x years.[/quote]
Interesting. According to the 1963 GOI catalog, the Industar-22 was designed in 1945. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|