View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1709
|
Posted: Sun Feb 09, 2025 8:11 pm Post subject: A wide circa 1.8/16 lens taken from InFocus video projector |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I've got for cheap a video projector InFocus X6 from the late 2000s, cheap because it was outdated by today's standards and also because its DLP chip was burnt. I disassembled it and took its lens to adapt it to Sony Nex fitting it into a Chinese helicoid.
The lens' specification is nowhere announced, so I evaluate its characteristics in comparison to other lenses having a clearly indicated aperture and focal length. Basing on this comparison, I suppose it has the FL of 15mm or 16mm and the aperture of around f1.8. the lens convers APS-C with very limited vignetting.
I am pretty much amazed with the picture quality (sharpness, colours) and with its well controlled rectilinear distortion. Its bokeh looks nice too. The field curvature is much more pronounced, but it is not reduced to fuzziness off center. If you refocus on the corners, the corner subject remains perfectly sharp and undistorted. Pretty obvious CA in contrast light margins, but nothing too nasty.
Here are some samples taken at different distances.
#1 Sooc jpg, near field
#2 Near field again
#3 BW taken from the blue channel
#4 Counter light, exposure tweak
#5 CA visible in lantern lines, but good rectangular geometry on the whole
#6 Mid-range in focus and far field OOF
#7 Just a street shot
#8 A landscape shot
#9 A night shot
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ultrapix
 Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 608 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Mon Feb 10, 2025 9:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Very interesting, by the way the right side is way sharper, maybe something wrong in the adapting process? |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1709
|
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 6:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
You are right, the PVU tape of which I made the layer to fit the lens into helicoid makes a slight tilt. I tried to level the lens better vertically. Here is the result.
#1 Sooc jpg
#2 Processed in Nik Silver
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Ultrapix
 Joined: 06 Jan 2012 Posts: 608 Location: Italy
|
Posted: Tue Feb 11, 2025 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ultrapix wrote:
Better, indeed, and really good. I remember a similar experiment by Jangreenhalg some time ago. Those lenses may be interesting |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1709
|
Posted: Wed Feb 12, 2025 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you for your feedback!
I am thinking over the way to better fix the lens in the helicoid, as it has a tendency to tilt slightly in the soft sticky ribbon.
Here are some more shots showing the lens' character with Sony Nex. Slight exposure and contrast tweaks are applied to colour shots, harder ones to BW processing.
#1
#2
#3
#4
#5
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1709
|
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2025 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
I'd like to add a couple more photos from this lens, just for fun.
#1
#2
#3
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Whomstevest
Joined: 19 Oct 2020 Posts: 7 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Posted: Sun Feb 23, 2025 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Whomstevest wrote:
What's the rough flange distance of the lens? Got a photo of the setup? Shots look very nice! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
alex ph
 Joined: 16 Mar 2013 Posts: 1709
|
Posted: Mon Feb 24, 2025 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
alex ph wrote:
Thank you for your appreciation. I dismantled all the plastic rings coming from the projector and left only the metal barrel. Following the link I gave in the first post you may see how the lens looked like when it makes part of the projector. And here is the final setup:
It is a 17-32m Chinese helicoid put on extra slim M42 ring. I added a №3 M42 extension ring in order to put the lens deep inside, held with a band of a sticky foam, and to keep it from touching the camera internals.
This way the moving focus part of the lens is secluded inside the helicoid, but you still may zoom the lens with its front part. Zooming capability is really limited, 1.1x or 1.2x, so I do not really use it.
The distance from the rear lens to the Sony mount flange is about 8mm or 9mm at infinity. I have no tool for a precise measurement in this case, and a quick caliper blow allows only an approximate view. Add 18mm of Sony E mount flange, from which follows the lens has 26mm or 27mm of flange distance. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kds315*
 Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16697 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Wed Feb 26, 2025 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
 _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|