Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

A joyful use of color filters in AF (IR) photography
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 3:27 pm    Post subject: A joyful use of color filters in AF (IR) photography Reply with quote

I've taken Panasonic Lumix TZ7, a compact digital camera from the late 2000s which is pretty nice on its own, and I transformed it to a "full-spectrum" camera with a simple detachment of a "hot-mirror" filter covering its sensor. Now the camera captures plenty of "extra" waves which give to daytime images a hard magenta tint. But this also pushes the camera to the well recognized IR performance, with mutated leaf and skin colours. That is pretty much of fun. I do not have a 720nm filter in my box, so used color filters, just putting them handheld in front of the Lumix lens. This is even more fun.

Compact digital zooms do not often have a filter thread on the lens, which is the case of my Lumix. What I am interested in, do you use or know any solution to attach a thin colour film on the front of the lens? I mean, I can easily cut a circle of a colour film and try that myself. What could be the source of thin film of different colours? And does it exist a film-thin 720nm material (not a classic glass filter) to use for a full-pfledged IR shooting?

Here are some samples from my first experiments

#1 With a blue glass filter held in front of the camera, light exposure and contrast tweaks


#2 With a green glass filter held in front of the camera, light exposure and contrast tweaks


#3 Orange or maybe blue or green filter, I haven't noted


#4 Bare "full-spectrum" shot, with WB corrected + light exposure and contrast tweaks


#5 Same in macro, just to see if it is possible to go "normal' with such a camera


#6 Red filter held in front, bw converted, contrast boosted


#7 BW conversion after a blue filter used


So, my question now is how to avoid holding large glass filters in front of the camera and just put a thin film layer directly on the lens which is regularly moving when zoomed and folding when the camera is switched off.


Last edited by alex ph on Thu Feb 06, 2025 3:49 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And another one, with the orange filter, leaving interestingly pretty much of magenta in the folliage colouring



PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 5:48 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My old vintage 1960 Voigtländer Vitomatic range finder has no threads but Voigtländer overcame this with push on filters.

Theoretically you could knock something up using a 3d printer to take Cokin filter holders and filters.
Filter in place:



Filter detached:


If you make it in TPU it should be soft enough not to damage anything.


PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2025 11:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've played with loads of colour filters on both my full spectrum cameras.
All the red filters I've tried work well though the #25 remains my favorite, most yellow & orange filters are also long pass designs, that just add a little more visual light to the IR.
Blue filters are more variable, but darker types can be effective. The #47 tends to give goldie type results (blue skies & yellow foliage), I've also had interesting results from some technical glasses such as BG3 & U330 that transmit UV, a little blue & IR. I've only got these two as 25mm bare filters so I'm rather limited on the lenses I can tried them on (this makes a BIG difference when UV is included)
I've found green filters to be very variable, with 3 different #58 filters giving very different results to each other one transmits loads of IR, one hardly any and the third half way between the first two. One of these works well on my Foveon camera (which is IR sensitive with the dust filter removed (very simple on the SD14)

If your after a cheap filter for IR only, crossed polarisers can come close (the first needs to be a linear type), many ND filters will also transmit IR, so darker types give an IR look. Unexposed but processed B&W negative is also an option...

Examples of many of my IR shots can be found in a IR dedicated flickr album here https://flic.kr/s/aHsjsHz7nC (rather than clutter your thread with my images)


PostPosted: Sat Feb 08, 2025 1:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Vintage_Photographer wrote:

Theoretically you could knock something up using a 3d printer to take Cokin filter holders and filters.


Thank you for the idea! It could better work with fixed length lenses. The zoom on Lumix is fully collapsable and comes flat when switched off, so any snap-on solution is highly fragile.


Image credit

I searched more and found someone glued a small sized glass filter to the lens front with a glue tape, which might be a good solution, though not facilitating colour filter change.

Image credit

I am still curious about an interchangeable filter trick.

DConvert, thank you for your detailed overview. That sounds rich, and you have made some great shots. Please feel free to populate the thread with some of them, if you wish!


PostPosted: Thu Mar 06, 2025 11:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've found an interesting solution for the issue of the non-changeable IR filter stuck to the lens' front. I discovered the existence of variable IR-filters from China. So I've got a 37mm one which I stuck to the front of the Lumix. Now it looks like that and, following the specification, the IR capacity of the filter varies from 550nm to 750nm which is a nice range indeed.



Now I have a difficulty to use simple colour filters which was a fun, but I've got access to a more "classic" IR photography with "many-in-one" solution. Here are some samples in residual colour of various transmission degrees coming from this setup, as well as simple BW conversions of the shots.

At the widest angle the thick revolving filter vignettes quite visibly, adding some more vintage character to the shots. Once the lens is slightly zoomed, the field of view gets normal.

#1


#2


#3


#4


#5


#6


#7


#8


PostPosted: Fri Mar 07, 2025 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

alex ph wrote:
I've found an interesting solution for the issue of the non-changeable IR filter stuck to the lens' front. I discovered the existence of variable IR-filters from China. So I've got a 37mm one which I stuck to the front of the Lumix. Now it looks like that and, following the specification, the IR capacity of the filter varies from 550nm to 750nm which is a nice range indeed.


Yes these filters can be good but the name & quoted wavelength range are a little misleading.

What they actually are is a combination of a red filter (~550nm) and a variable ND filter (passes IR and has variable visible transmission). There is another version made with blue & variable ND, and of course you can just use a vari ND (adjusting the entire visible block while keeping IR)

At one end of the scale it works roughly as a 590nm, but transmits somewhat less particularly of the visible (where it's about 1 stop darker and it may show some polarization effects in a random direction) at the other end of the scale it behaves like a variable ND at its darkest transmitting IR at somewhere around 80%.
Anywhere in the middle the entire 550-750 block changes intensity as a whole giving its transmission spectra a 2 step appearance.
you can't get to a point where the ratio of 600nm to 700nm (for example) changes.

Most long pass type filters have a fairly sharp cut off (but it's never completely sharp) Transmission 50nm below the quoted value will be near zero, while 50nm above the quoted value it will have reached it's maximum (typically ~95%).

If you have a situation where there is a distracting part transmitting at 610nm & something of interest at 690nm, a 650nm long pass filter will differentiate them while the variable ND won't. This is likely a huge simplification from most real world situations, but there can certainly be situations with atomic type illumination which tends to show very tight tranmission bands - Sodium lights were a common & severe case of this, street lights now tend to be mercury lights which have multiple sharp transmission bands over a wider range of colours. Light polution filters for astronomy typically block these specific wavelengths while passing much of the rest.

I've found my variable filters to give a little more ghosting & flare to single longpass filters, but the extra control to play with can be effective. Certainly a twist of the filters control is much quicker than changing filters (even where they do just screw on) and trying (or just carrying) multiple longpass filters can be a pain.

One of my favorite IR shots was taken using a Vari ND filter because I hadn't packed any IR filters on that occasion:
PK 28mm vari ND by Mike Kanssen, on Flickr


PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2025 11:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you so much for your precise explanation and hints! Now I get better how the variable ID filter works. And I definitely should try a variable ND with the Lumix mod. I just need to figure out how to change the filter stuck quite solidly with the sticky ribbon to the front lens, as the zoom mechanics of P&S cameras is rather tender.

And yes, I feel you are right saying variable filter adds ghosting. At least with the cheap one I've got it's clearly visible.

By the way, I looked again at your IR shots following the link. Found again many great ones. And this time I was especially impressed with your shots of old trees. Congrats!


PostPosted: Sat Mar 08, 2025 5:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

alex ph wrote:
Thank you so much for your precise explanation and hints! Now I get better how the variable ID filter works. And I definitely should try a variable ND with the Lumix mod. I just need to figure out how to change the filter stuck quite solidly with the sticky ribbon to the front lens, as the zoom mechanics of P&S cameras is rather tender.

And yes, I feel you are right saying variable filter adds ghosting. At least with the cheap one I've got it's clearly visible.

By the way, I looked again at your IR shots following the link. Found again many great ones. And this time I was especially impressed with your shots of old trees. Congrats!


Thanks for the compliments!
You may be able to stick a stepping ring onto the lens & then screw in filters to that normally.
IIRC cokin & other square filter systems include a bracket that attaches to the tripod mount, but I'm not sure that would be such a good approach for IR filters etc. (too prone to light leaks round the rear of the filter).


PostPosted: Mon Mar 10, 2025 6:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are definitely right when suggesting the use an intermediary ring. It must be a step-up one, as long as a 37mm thick filter vignettes at the widest zoom setting of this Lumix. Something like a 37mm->42mm step-up ring and then a 42mm variable ND or IR filter. I'll see at which point this additional setup squeezes into the budget of my curiosity game.


PostPosted: Tue Mar 11, 2025 11:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I made one for my Canon compact, however you can buy Cokin filter holders for compact cameras, I think this would do the job for you. I searched 'Cokin filter holder for compact camera'



PostPosted: Fri Mar 14, 2025 10:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you, that looks like an ingenious solution. Even though quite bulky too. This way a pocket compact camera stops entering back your pocket.

Does your setup look the same or more compact? How do you find it operating in practice?


PostPosted: Tue Mar 18, 2025 12:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Meanwhile I continue to experiment with PP settings trying to reach some "classic" IR unreal effects.

A couple of shots with swapped colour channels. All online tutorials say one needs to swap red and blue channels only. What I see is that if one touches green channel too, the shot may become more expressive. Or may not.

#1 With tweaks in green channel


#2 Just red channel swapped


#3 The bare shot via IR filter


#4 Just another bare one, with contrast boost


#5 For curiosity, a shot from IR-ed Canon Powershot (produced several years later than the Lumix), with a ND filter on


I must say, I see more positively IQ of the mid-late 2000s compact cameras other than from their younger relatives coming from the same makers. Canon gives a good illustration here. Earlier P&S shots look more interesting, with good detail and contrast in a right way. And I do not quite understand why the later models which are optimized pixelwise look less interesting and less jucy.