View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ianf
Joined: 23 Nov 2018 Posts: 15 Location: Sidmouth, uk
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 1:02 pm Post subject: 90mm for Street Photgraphy? |
|
|
Ianf wrote:
Im currently using a 35mm on a Bessa R2, has anyone tried 90mm for street work? Too tight ?
Ian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 2:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
I tried 85mm and 90mm on my Leica, but in narrow streets I found it pretty difficult for non-stationary subjects. However, it can work nicely if you have more open area's. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kypfer
Joined: 27 Sep 2017 Posts: 523 Location: Jersey C.I.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kypfer wrote:
An 85mm f/2 can be useful for isolating subjects in a crowd or selecting details in an otherwise empty environment.
The Jupiter 9 is widely available at a reasonable price, so might be worth a try. If you don't like it, no great loss or sell it on, if you do like it, use it until you can afford something even better |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sjak
Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Kypfer, funny, I was indeed referring to the Jupiter-9 (and the Summicron-M 90 pre-APO) and it is an excellent lens for sure. For the situations you mention, 85-90 can be great, but I found it uncomfortable as a single walkaround lens. As an addition to a 35 or 50, that is a totally different matter of course |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
I've used 100mm, and it's not an impossible focal length for street.
Won't lend you that "up close and personal" look if you are focused on candids though.
Canon FDn 100mm F2.8
Showing off the goods by Curry Hexagon
Boredom by Curry Hexagon
As soon as you leave an open street though, it immediately gets awfully tight:
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ianf
Joined: 23 Nov 2018 Posts: 15 Location: Sidmouth, uk
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2018 5:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ianf wrote:
Tu for sharing the images and advice, it’s appreciated.
I’m now considering my options:-) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
If I were to consider 90mm as being in the middle of this general focal range, say from 80mm to 105mm, there are several good lenses I can think of that will work well.
Canon FD 85mm f/1.8
Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 L or Aspherical
Canon 100mm f/2.8
Nikon 85mm f/1.4, f/1.8 and f/2
Nikon 105mm f/2.5
Samyang 85mm f/1.4
And, of course, whenever I think 90mm, I think Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 macro -- a remarkable lens. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aidaho
Joined: 29 Apr 2018 Posts: 456 Location: Ukraine
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
aidaho wrote:
cooltouch wrote: |
If I were to consider 90mm as being in the middle of this general focal range, say from 80mm to 105mm, there are several good lenses I can think of that will work well.
Canon FD 85mm f/1.8
Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 L or Aspherical
Canon 100mm f/2.8
Nikon 85mm f/1.4, f/1.8 and f/2
Nikon 105mm f/2.5
Samyang 85mm f/1.4
And, of course, whenever I think 90mm, I think Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 macro -- a remarkable lens. |
In my opinion, narrow depth of field might not offer as much value here.
Weight and handling are more important.
E.g. hauling my Samyang 85mm f/1.4 for shooting street doesn't sound like a good idea unless there is a dire need of low T-stop.
I know everyone's tolerance to weight of the system is different, still this is something worth to consider. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Tue Dec 25, 2018 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
I didn't use my Bessa R2 lately but I wouldn't recommend to use non-coupled SLR lenses on that camera; particularly not in this focal length.
My compatible 90mm RF lenses for the Bessa are tested here: http://forum.mflenses.com/90mm-rf-lens-comparison-leitz-topcon-voigtlander-t80008.html
I think all existing 90mm RF lenses would be more than good enough.
However, I'm not a typical street shooter but I have my doubt's if 90mm is a good idea on a manual focus RF camera due to the rather shallow depth of field which requires very accurate focusing. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cooltouch
Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9096 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2018 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
cooltouch wrote: |
If I were to consider 90mm as being in the middle of this general focal range, say from 80mm to 105mm, there are several good lenses I can think of that will work well.
Canon FD 85mm f/1.8
Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 L or Aspherical
Canon 100mm f/2.8
Nikon 85mm f/1.4, f/1.8 and f/2
Nikon 105mm f/2.5
Samyang 85mm f/1.4
And, of course, whenever I think 90mm, I think Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5 macro -- a remarkable lens. |
In my opinion, narrow depth of field might not offer as much value here.
Weight and handling are more important.
E.g. hauling my Samyang 85mm f/1.4 for shooting street doesn't sound like a good idea unless there is a dire need of low T-stop.
I know everyone's tolerance to weight of the system is different, still this is something worth to consider. |
I completely agree regarding size and weight. I was merely mentioning all sizes just to be complete. I personally own the Canon FD 85mm f/1.2 Aspherical, FD 85mm f/1.8, and Tamron SP 90mm f/2.5. And yes, while carrying the 85/1.8 or 90/2.5 would be much more practical for general street photography, there have been occasions when I've sucked it up and taken my 85 Aspherical out for a stroll -- and was very glad I did. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix
Joined: 30 Apr 2017 Posts: 292
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fiftyonepointsix wrote:
kypfer wrote: |
An 85mm f/2 can be useful for isolating subjects in a crowd or selecting details in an otherwise empty environment.
The Jupiter 9 is widely available at a reasonable price, so might be worth a try. If you don't like it, no great loss or sell it on, if you do like it, use it until you can afford something even better |
A Jupiter-9 is very difficult to calibrate focus across the range with a Leica RF. The best I've gotten is 1.5m to infinity, that done by changing the spacing of the rear triplet to reduce focal length, then adjusting the main shim.
The rigid post-war 90/4 Elmar is a good choice, can be found under $100 in good condition. Small and light, the F4 aperture will make it usable on the Bessa R2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
spleenone
Joined: 26 Dec 2009 Posts: 1130 Location: Slovakia
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
spleenone wrote:
aidaho wrote: |
I've used 100mm, and it's not an impossible focal length for street.
Won't lend you that "up close and personal" look if you are focused on candids though.
Canon FDn 100mm F2.8
|
Same to me, using Nikkor 105mm for street work and let it go very well.
Cheers
PS. btw good samples. _________________ Shoot on analog mainly with
Nikkor glass
then Pentacon6TL for squares
and Fujica GL690 in case of 6x9
Carpe diem! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
papasito
Joined: 09 Jan 2015 Posts: 1663
|
Posted: Sat May 29, 2021 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
papasito wrote:
I use generally a 35/1,4 GM and 135/1,8 GM lenses for street pics.
Very happy with both. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017 Posts: 1445 Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
Posted: Tue Jun 01, 2021 10:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
I used a 50mm, but I know Saul Leiter was fond of a 150mm, among others, for street work. You can see how the compression allowed him to mimic his painting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2022 10:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
It depends on how crowed & close I get to my subjects, but I will use anything from 17-200mm on an SLR, or 24-135mm on a RF. For some reason I prefer 35mm or below on an RF when shooting street scenes.. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pendennis
Joined: 16 Oct 2021 Posts: 12
|
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2022 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
pendennis wrote:
A number of years ago, in the early 70's, I was a stringer for a metro newspaper. I had a Nikkormat FT, and I asked one of the regular photogs what lens would be good for everyday shooting. He advised that I get the Nikkor 105mm f/2.5. His reasoning was that it allowed you to "get up close and personal" without having to get up close and personal. Coupled with Tri-X, pushed 1-2 stops, I always got great results with it, and one remains one of my "go to" lenses for my F3, and F2 cameras for "walk around" photography.
I also used it for posed portraits for head and shoulder shots on a more informal setting. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|