Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

3D Crosseye Stereo updated 29 Oct
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 10:46 pm    Post subject: 3D Crosseye Stereo updated 29 Oct Reply with quote

kds315* made a post showing his 3D experiments. So as not to hijack it, here are my efforts. The proper term for these images is 'Stereograms'

Not everyone can do crosseye stereo but I can, so here are a few photos. These were taken a while ago mostly on my Nikon D40. I don't use fancy equipment, I use the 'Timewarp' technique and if necessary line up the photos before pairing in Photoshop.

Here goes.









I love this one, a mormal photo just doesnt do it justice








The last one was tricky, both people had to stand absolutely still and only move their eyes to the camera.
I made an anaglyph version for my nephew (pictured) which I just can't find.


Last edited by philslizzy on Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:18 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2014 11:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Timewarp technique?

http://www.stlyrics.com/songs/h/horrorrocky10629/timewarp341755.html


PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 12:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some more dragged out of the archives, I'm on a roll now!!





I like the flare on this one.















all for now folks


PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How to make stereograms and the 'timewarp' technique explained

Stereoscopy isnt hard, the hardest part is viewing them. More later.

To achieve a 3D effect you need to take a photo and move the camera left or right a little then take a second photo. Your eyes are just few centimetres apart, enough to get a three dimensional view of the world. To replicate that photographically, Ideally the camera viewpoint should be the same. Sometimes it works, sometimes not. Sometimes the distance between the camera viewpoints can be varied - depending on the subject photographed and effect wanted. I often take 3 or 4 shots varying distances apart and select the best pairing.

You can buy all sorts of fancy equipment to move the camera left or right between shots but I prefer to use the 'Timewarp' technique:

Quote the song:
"It's just a jump to the left. And then a step to the right."

Lean your body to one side, take the first image then lean it to the opposite side then take the next image. Or take a step to the right.

A 'point of interest' is important when making stereograms, as without one they can be difficult to see. Decide which is the point of interest, focus on it and keep it in exactly the same place in each photo.

Make sure your photo has depth. Depth? yes, objects in front of and behind your subject are important, particularly scenery, the one of the boat and the farm both have a wall in front of them, keeping this in frame helps the 3d effect. Below is a nice photo of a ruined monastery, no foreground gives it a flat appearance.



for a better 3D image of this I should have stepped 50cm or more rather than the normal 10 - 15cm

These next pictures were taken a good metre and a half apart and about 12 seconds between them (a proper timewarp!) this allowed the clouds to move enough to get the effect, the clouds were the point of interest:





These images were taken with about 20 to 30 cm between the two images, enhancing the 3d effect









Lastly here is a portrait of a friend. She had to sit absolutely still, the pics were taken about 15 cms apart so the effect is grossly exaggerated. I took one pair with her eyes focused on my shoulder and the next pair with her eyes looking at the camera in both shots. This is by far the better, where she is looking at the camera. The point of interest (as always with portraits) was the eyes.



I'll get back with more of my technique later and look at the different viewing techniques and software that you can use.

Thanks for looking


PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very nice, great depth and sharpness! So you do the cha-cha method?
I use the free stereo-photo-maker, quite happy with it. And you?
(of course this method has issues. a beamsplitter is of course much better, but clumsy to use and halfs the resolution...)


Last edited by kds315* on Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:26 pm; edited 1 time in total


PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Cha cha I like it. Look again, while you were writing this reply I added a few more images


PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2014 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also quite nice, I like the ones shot in the south, very 3D!


PostPosted: Wed Sep 03, 2014 6:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

kds315* wrote:
Also quite nice, I like the ones shot in the south, very 3D!


Thanks Klaus. I did once put two Nikon DSLR's next to each other, and pre focus them firing together with a remote control but often only one camera would fire. This technique is best if you gan get it to work, much better for action shots and candids. I am looking for two identical compacts cheap enough to hack and make a permanent setup.


PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I may try it with my NEX and my A6000, I have duplicate lenses I can use on both, they both use the same remote....


PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 10:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phil, I love the pictures but I can't see them in 3D whatever I do. Can you explain for me how to view them please? How far away from
the screen should my eyes be?


PostPosted: Fri Sep 19, 2014 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Phil, these are great, the 3D effect is really distinctive!

Peter, sit about three feet away from your screen, look at the gap between the photos and slowly cross your eyes until the combined 3D image appears between the two shots.


PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

DigiChromeEd wrote:
Phil, these are great, the 3D effect is really distinctive!

Peter, sit about three feet away from your screen, look at the gap between the photos and slowly cross your eyes until the combined 3D image appears between the two shots.


Thanks Ed, works a treat with me! I remember now why I put a gap, many many years ago I read advice to leave a gap for exactly the reason you said. I've done it so long I actually forgot the reason why it was there in the first place.

Remember the 4-shot passport polaroids that took 4 pics on one print? This was a pair I had done, I separated them and put them R-L, they look great viewed in 3d. A lucky find!



PostPosted: Sat Sep 20, 2014 12:19 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looking again at them, the one of the rocks looks so different in 3D, and the one of the old hollow log is hard to make out in 2d. Stereoscopy helps make sense of some images, scientists and geologists use it regularly. The Apollo astronauts used same technique as I when photographing objects on the moon's surface.


PostPosted: Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Some pics today taken at Dunham Massey





















Thanks for looking