| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:43 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
yinyangbt wrote:
I like the 4 and the last one .The last one because it comes from a camera supposed to give poor results in High ISo : OLY EPL-1 !!!! has some noise , but there is a lot of detail !
4. is Pentax K-X ....WOW !
1. is Sony Alpha 900
2. is EOS 7D
3. is G12
5. is Nex 5
6. is Nikon 5100
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007
Posts: 10472
Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
for me the worst is the Nex5, it clean everything even the details
the m4:3 keep more details than the Nex
_________________
T* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Riku
Joined: 23 May 2007
Posts: 1059
Location: Finland
Expire: 2017-04-30
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Riku wrote:
Pentax K-x is still the best buy 
EPL-1 seems like the best mirrorless. I guess these are from jpegs which are usually poor with Sony and excellent with Olympus?
G12... awful! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 4269
Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
thanks for posting this. i think the results are indeed surprising, but in any test like this, i think its also important to knw what the sttings were on each camera. to give quick example, my x100 is super at 3200 at normal sharpness and noise reduction settings. if you 'up' sharpness stting or 'lower' noise setting, results are much less than optimal. my guess is that each camera has 'optimal' settings for high iso. tbh, i love my ep2 but i cant get 3200 results like this at the settings i use. in fact i cant get results like this at 800! so selfishly, i really wanna know what the settings were!
_________________
Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
| Riku wrote: |
Pentax K-x is still the best buy
EPL-1 seems like the best mirrorless. I guess these are from jpegs which are usually poor with Sony and excellent with Olympus?
G12... awful! |
Yes, there are from jpegs . I confess I am amazed of the Olympus result (ok, a little noise) : better detail than the nex , that I use and like !
The nikon is very good also , but Pentax rocks !
It's a shame that there are so little choices for MF in P-K mount
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
| rbelyell wrote: |
| thanks for posting this. i think the results are indeed surprising, but in any test like this, i think its also important to knw what the sttings were on each camera. to give quick example, my x100 is super at 3200 at normal sharpness and noise reduction settings. if you 'up' sharpness stting or 'lower' noise setting, results are much less than optimal. my guess is that each camera has 'optimal' settings for high iso. tbh, i love my ep2 but i cant get 3200 results like this at the settings i use. in fact i cant get results like this at 800! so selfishly, i really wanna know what the settings were! |
I think you're right!
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
This is exactly why I don't shoot JPG. The Nex is miles better in RAW, for example.
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
| This is exactly why I don't shoot JPG. The Nex is miles better in RAW, for example. |
Yep !
You too are right !  That's why I was surprised by these results .
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
sichko
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 2475
Location: South West UK
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 10:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
sichko wrote:
I thought that the dpreview files were for personal use only. Is dpreview happy about you using them here ?
_________________
John |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
yinyangbt
Joined: 08 Oct 2010
Posts: 1973
Location: Romania
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yinyangbt wrote:
| sichko wrote: |
| I thought that the dpreview files were for personal use only. Is dpreview happy about you using them here ? |
Didn't know about that  Sorry !
Ok , everyone knows where the files come from .It was a simpler way to discuss a problem than posting links .
_________________
Cheers , Teo
http://photo.net/photodb/member-photos?user_id=5778915 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rbelyell
Joined: 13 Oct 2009
Posts: 4269
Location: somewhere in the mountains of central NY
Expire: 2014-01-31
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rbelyell wrote:
i'm missing something....the pictures are changed and much different than what i saw before.
_________________
Epson RD1 + Elmarit 21/2.8; Summarit 50/1.5; Summarit 75/2.5; Elmar-c 90/4; Sankyo Komura 135/2.8, Hektor 135/4.5; Braun Paxina 29 6x6; Photax Boyer Paris; Holga 120 Pano
GREAT STUFF FOR SALE:
Contax T
Hasselblad XPan + 45/4, 90/4
Kodak Retina Reflex IV + full set of Schneider Krueznach lenses
Mercury 2 half frame 35mm
Kodak Pro slr/n
Fuji GM670+100/3.5+65/8!
Praktisix 6x6 medium format + ZeissBiometar 120/2.8
Bessa T 101 Anniversary Edition in Navy Blue
Mamiya Six Folder with Zuiko 75/3.5
Adaptall: Tamron SP 28-85 macro
Cameras: Canon IX
PM for more complete descriptions/pix. All in great shape!
_________________________
'buy me a drink, sing me a song,
take me as i come 'cause i can't stay long' |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
