View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 6:07 am Post subject: 1st time spooling 120 onto 620, not good |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Just fogged/exposed a roll of Fomapan 400 thinking one of my Brownie
Hawkeyes would do the job. Unfortunately when spooling it back to the
620 spool, the film transport is not too sophisticated and loosely wound
the film . So, popping the cover off and pulling out the film with the lights
on instantly grew antlers in my hair. Guess going into my changing
closet and tearing the film off the 120 spool and then tightly winding it on a
620, reminiscent of joints I used to roll way back, never mind, will
be a better way. Any other suggestions?
At least it wasn't an $8 roll of Rollei Retro 80s, right Andy? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 6950 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
No suggestions here, but you have now reminded me that 620 cameras are not for me. I have a Kodak 620 folder on the bay now. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
I've never tried to do that trick.
I think the Retro 80s is made in 620 or is it 127? They make some weird old size I remember. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Andy, it's in both 120 and 127. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
This is how I do it:
in a changing bag (a real dark room is probably better yet), unroll the film + paper from a 120 roll - some say to roll it onto another roll (or use a camera to do so - actually using a camera to do this seems like a good idea, I'll try that next time! I just unroll and collect the thing into a loose roll without a spool.
then put the just released end of the paper into the 620 spool, and start wrapping tightly... feel for where the film starts to get it on the RIGHT side of the paper (if you miss, your re-roll still works, only you'll probably cut off the last frame) and keep winding tightly. when you get to the other end of the film, gently loosen the tape that holds it on the paper - and let the re-rolling take care of re-attaching it at the correct spot.
That's it. Getting the wind tight is key.
I've had the loose take up spooling issue with the 1913 Brownie - once you know your camera will do this, unload in the dark, like you say. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Katastrofo
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 10405 Location: USA
Expire: 2013-11-19
|
Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Katastrofo wrote:
Thanks, Jussi, I'll try that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Nesster
Joined: 24 Apr 2008 Posts: 5883 Location: NJ, USA
Expire: 2014-02-20
|
Posted: Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nesster wrote:
This by the way is a great illustrated guide (I hadn't seen it before):
http://www.brownie-camera.com/respool/respool.shtml
The only bit I do differently is when I get to the tape end on the 620 side, I just detach the tape and let it attach itself to the paper - simpler and sure to avoid any kink. _________________ -Jussi
Camera photos
Print Photographica
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|