| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Posts: 894
|
 Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:09 am Post subject: omeone tell me an opinion on this lens. |
 |
|
francotirador wrote:
Someone
_________________
Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum ....
Last edited by francotirador on Mon May 01, 2017 3:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aoleg
Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Posts: 1389
Location: Berlin, DE
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
aoleg wrote:
I don't own one, but those who do praise it high. They're quite scarce though. I would pay $50-60 for a copy in good condition; they seem to go higher than that.
_________________
List of lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cobalt60
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: Central Europe
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cobalt60 wrote:
If I remember correctly it has been a favourite in this forum some month ago ... at the standard sales prices on "The Bay" you are running no big risk to sink much money, so it's worth a try.
_________________
Visit the Yashica Information Site! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Cobalt60
Joined: 01 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: Central Europe
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Cobalt60 wrote:
@aoleg: unfortunately you're in Canada ... otherwise I could offer one to you - but the shipping prices will most probably kill the deal.
_________________
Visit the Yashica Information Site! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Posts: 894
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
I have seen that there are two versions, 6 elements 5 groups & 7 at 6. What differences, known by the acronym or the serial number?
Tanks, ...
The life is more easy with this forum .... 
_________________
Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
In another forum we have some members who are collecting the whole ML Serie. If you use Google translation, you can read.
http://www.digicamclub.de/showthread.php?t=10672
I only did own the predeccesors, Yashica DS-M 24/35/50/135 and 200mm
The DS-M Version was 6 Elements in 5 Groups.. dont know the ML Version.
Someone post this:
Das Yashica ML 35mm F2.8 ist baugleich mit dem Hoya HMC 35mm F2.8..
Beide basieren auf dem Tokina RMC 35mm (MX35)
means:
the Yashica ML 2.8/35mm is equivalent with the Hoya HMC 35mm. Both based on the Tokina RMC 35mm (MX35). The are only different in colorendition.
He refers a japanese side for that.
Here are some samples, taken on a crop, from another forum member..
http://www.flickr.com/photos/paguru/sets/72157619348745221/
The DS-M Version i did have was fantastic and as far as i know, the ML Version should be the same or better.
Cheers
Henry
_________________
some light-painting lens stuff.. 
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008
Posts: 2106
Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Some professional photographer said ML 35/2.8 is almost equivalent to
C/Y Distagon 35/2.8, though its colour is a bit cooler side. These are
from using the newer version of 6 group 7 element lens.
The older 5 group 6 element lens may have diagonal pattern of
focus ring (rubber I guess, since I do not have one), newer version has
straight pattern. But guessing from 50/1.9 and 50/1.4 lenses, see >
The left two are older and more decorative ML 50mm 1.9 and 1.4, the right-hand
one is newer ML 50/1.4.
My ML lens examples are > http://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/mylens_yashicas
_________________
Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
francotirador
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Posts: 894
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
francotirador wrote:
hinnerker, koji, aoleg & Cobalt60.
Many thanks 
_________________
Canon 5D II-Sony nex 6
Canon L 80-200 f 2.8 - Canon L 135 f2 - Canon FD 135/2.5 convert to EOS - Yashica 50 1.4 ML - Canon FD 50 1.2 - Distagon 35mm 2.8 T AEJ - Minolta MC 24mm f 2.8 - Canon LTM 85 1.9- Canon LTM 85mm 1.9 convert to EOS - Rodenstock Heligon 50 1.9 - Color Skopar 50 2.8 & MAte Box & filters 4X4
Contax RTS II y Minolta SRT 303 - 28-135 3.6 Tokina - Minolta MD 45 f2.0 - Minolta Zoom 80 200 4.5 (Leica)
www.isgleasphoto.com
The life is more easy with this forum .... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:51 pm Post subject: .... |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
for what i see ....
yashica lenses are not very good....
probably the 35mm and 24mm are only the 2 lenses better built of this japanese company !!!
I have only the 135mm and I must say than It is fully CA lover !
horrible lens !
-.-
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Petzval 1840
Joined: 26 Aug 2009
Posts: 103
Location: N.E. of Spain (Europe)
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Petzval 1840 wrote:
Hi Francotirador and all the People:
I have a Yashica 35mm-2,8, preset and non multicoated, M42.
This old lens has an irreproachable yield. It cost me in Barcelona, 12 € in 1984.
Bests Regards. David |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 2:30 pm Post subject: Re: .... |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
| metallaro1980 wrote: |
for what i see ....
yashica lenses are not very good....
probably the 35mm and 24mm are only the 2 lenses better built of this japanese company !!!
I have only the 135mm and I must say than It is fully CA lover !
horrible lens !
-.- |
First of all, we have to make clear, from what Yashica lenses you are talking.
We have to differantiate in the different Lines/Series, Yashica did produce.
Yashikor, DX, DS, DS-M and ML.
To say i have one lens, and the lens is not good.. says really nothing.
Without differentating this lines/series, you cant really talk about Yashica Lenses.
I did own the Yashica DS-M Line/Serie from 24,35,50,135mm and 200mm
Only the 135mm was an average lens. The 1.4/50mm is a superb one, outperforms in my eyes after a long competitive test the Olympus Zuiko 1.4/50mm. The 35mm is also a superb lens, with very nice color rendition and sharpness on a FF Cam. The 24mm is also a real winner in my eyes.
The Yashica DS-M 4/200mm is also a great lens.
In the whole DS-M Line, only the 135mm is not as good as espected.
Friends of mine are collecting the Yashica ML Line.. from 21 to 200mm and also do have the "fisheye" for the line.. we are sending us our lenses across germany to compair the DS-M Line against the ML Line...
The 135mm ML is better then the 135mm in DS-M Version. But both are not more then average. The 1.4/50mm ML is not as good as the DS-M Version of this focal length.
The ML 2.8/55mm Macro ML is superb. I did a comparison against a very good and sharp Nikon AI 3.5/55mm Micro Nikkor.
All lenses we have tested are in this two series are brilliant performers (excluding the 135mm DS-M and the 1.4/50mm ML)
So why you can make such a general statement, Yashica lenses are not good?
Cheers
Henry
_________________
some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de
Last edited by hinnerker on Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:23 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
| Petzval 1840 wrote: |
Hi Francotirador and all the People:
I have a Yashica 35mm-2,8, preset and non multicoated, M42.
This old lens has an irreproachable yield. It cost me in Barcelona, 12 € in 1984.
Bests Regards. David |
Again, which Yashica line.. is this a Yashikor or a Yashinon lens?
The first Yashikor 35mm was a horrible lens.. !
Everyone who post here for Yashica lenses should give the exact name and serie of the lens.. otherwise yourself make a big mistake in experience and also thinking about Yashica Lenses... believe me..
Cheers
Henry
_________________
some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:10 pm Post subject: Re: .... |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
| hinnerker wrote: |
| metallaro1980 wrote: |
for what i see ....
yashica lenses are not very good....
probably the 35mm and 24mm are only the 2 lenses better built of this japanese company !!!
I have only the 135mm and I must say than It is fully CA lover !
horrible lens !
-.- |
First of all, we have to make clear, from what Yashica lenses you are talking.
We have to differantiate in the different Lines/Series, Yashica did produce.
Yashikor, DX, DS, DS-M and ML.
To say i have one lens, and the lens is not good.. says really nothing.
Without differentating this lines/series, you cant really talk about Yashica Lenses.
I did own the Yashica DS-M Line/Serie from 24,35,50,135mm and 200mm
Only the 135mm was an average lens. The 1.4/50mm is a superb one, outperforms in my eyes after a long competitive test the Olympus Zuiko 1.4/50mm. The 35mm is also a superb lens, with very nice color rendition and sharpness on a FF Cam. The 24mm is also a real winner in my eyes.
The Yashica DS-M 4/200mm is also a great lens.
In the whole DS-M Line, only the 135mm is not as good as espected.
Friends of mine are collecting the Yashica ML Line.. from 21 to 200mm and also do have the "fisheye" for the line.. we are sending us our lenses across germany to compair the DS-M Line against the ML Line...
The 135mm ML is better then the 135mm in DS-M Version. But both are not more then average. The 1.4/50mm ML is not as good as the DS-M Version of this focal length.
The ML 2.8/55mm Macro ML is superb. I did a comparison against a very good and sharp Nikon AI 3.5/55mm Micro Nikkor.
All lenses we have tested are in this two series are brilliant performers (excluding the 135mm DS-M and the 1.4/50mm ML)
So why you can make such a general statement, Yashica lenses are not good?
Cheers
Henry |
PLEASE CAN YOU LOOK THIS PICTURES ?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33530174@N05/4203215050/sizes/o/
do you see CA ?
for me, there are a lot of CA ....
the picture was taken using f:4
i can immagine the ca using f:2.8 !!!!!
for me good is:
no ca
good contrast, micro-contrast etc
with adobe photoshop and plugins I am not successful to correct the ca !
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
DS-M nice , sharp even at wide open.
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/yashica/auto-yashinon-ds-m-135mm-f2-8/
#1 wide open behind glass
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/yashica/auto-yashinon-ds-m-135mm-f2-8/Yashica_135mm_f2_8_M42-100.jpg.html
#2 ML lens has a version marked with "C" Made by Cosina average lens
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/japenese/yashica/yashica_ml_135mm_f2_8/
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57849
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:20 pm Post subject: Re: .... |
|
|
Attila wrote:
| metallaro1980 wrote: |
| hinnerker wrote: |
| metallaro1980 wrote: |
for what i see ....
yashica lenses are not very good....
probably the 35mm and 24mm are only the 2 lenses better built of this japanese company !!!
I have only the 135mm and I must say than It is fully CA lover !
horrible lens !
-.- |
First of all, we have to make clear, from what Yashica lenses you are talking.
We have to differantiate in the different Lines/Series, Yashica did produce.
Yashikor, DX, DS, DS-M and ML.
To say i have one lens, and the lens is not good.. says really nothing.
Without differentating this lines/series, you cant really talk about Yashica Lenses.
I did own the Yashica DS-M Line/Serie from 24,35,50,135mm and 200mm
Only the 135mm was an average lens. The 1.4/50mm is a superb one, outperforms in my eyes after a long competitive test the Olympus Zuiko 1.4/50mm. The 35mm is also a superb lens, with very nice color rendition and sharpness on a FF Cam. The 24mm is also a real winner in my eyes.
The Yashica DS-M 4/200mm is also a great lens.
In the whole DS-M Line, only the 135mm is not as good as espected.
Friends of mine are collecting the Yashica ML Line.. from 21 to 200mm and also do have the "fisheye" for the line.. we are sending us our lenses across germany to compair the DS-M Line against the ML Line...
The 135mm ML is better then the 135mm in DS-M Version. But both are not more then average. The 1.4/50mm ML is not as good as the DS-M Version of this focal length.
The ML 2.8/55mm Macro ML is superb. I did a comparison against a very good and sharp Nikon AI 3.5/55mm Micro Nikkor.
All lenses we have tested are in this two series are brilliant performers (excluding the 135mm DS-M and the 1.4/50mm ML)
So why you can make such a general statement, Yashica lenses are not good?
Cheers
Henry |
PLEASE CAN YOU LOOK THIS PICTURES ?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/33530174@N05/4203215050/sizes/o/
do you see CA ?
for me, there are a lot of CA ....
the picture was taken using f:4
i can immagine the ca using f:2.8 !!!!!
for me good is:
no ca
good contrast, micro-contrast etc
with adobe photoshop and plugins I am not successful to correct the ca ! |
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/mfl_club_members/esoxlucius/czplanar85zf/_ND38678.JPG.html?g2_imageViewsIndex=3
Newest Planar 85mm f1.4 ZF look inside tree ... looks CA to me too. I got CA with many lenses Flektogon 35mm, CZJ Sonnar 200mm f2.8 none of them was bad lens.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
hinnerker
Joined: 17 Aug 2009
Posts: 929
Location: Germany near Kiel
Expire: 2015-08-09
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
hinnerker wrote:
Ok, did you read my post? Dont think so..
Here an example of the 24mm DS-M... seemed to be a bad lens, because its from Yashica... OPEN THE LINKS IN A NEW BROWSER TAB ; after following the link, click in the images to enlarge to high resolution
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/yashinon/tomioka_yashinon__24mm_09-03-08_80.JPG
Your definition says.. Yashica Lenses are bad...
look here.. 200mm DS-M
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/yashinon/200er.JPG
Or do you mean this DS-M 1.4/50mm Crop is coming from a poor Yashica lens?
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/yashinon/nahcrop-14-bl8-1250px.jpg
This one comes from a DS-M 35mm Yashica.. what a poor lens...
http://dunkelnetz.de/images/objektivtests/yashinon/yashinon_35mm_bl8_2.JPG
Sorry, but your conclusion, having one lens means the whole Yashica Range of lenses... is poor. As i wrote, the 135mm is average... in both Series.. ML and DS-M.. but to say Yashica lenses are bad or not so good... ?
Cheers
Henry
_________________
some light-painting lens stuff..
... and an EOS 5D MKII
www.digicamclub.de
Last edited by hinnerker on Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:26 pm; edited 3 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
maybe i am too pernickety ....
ok.....
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:29 pm Post subject: Re: .... |
|
|
Orio wrote:
Metallaro, please do not address other forum members by writing in capital letters. It is considered like shouting and therefore not respectful.
-
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:31 pm Post subject: Re: .... |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
| Orio wrote: |
Metallaro, please do not address other forum members by writing in capital letters. It is considered like shouting and therefore not respectful.
- |
ok i understand ...
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
looking here:
http://www.zen20934.zen.co.uk/photography/MTF_Files/200mm_Region/index.htm
i would like to try the Canon EF 2/135 L.....
or the 180 macro ....
i prefer the 180 O.O
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
metallaro1980
Joined: 10 Sep 2009
Posts: 385
Location: West Emilia - Fidenza (PR) 43036 - Italy
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 4:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
metallaro1980 wrote:
therefore is it practically impossible to realize a objective with ca free ?
I have mistaken, I recognize my error !
_________________
Olympus OM: 28 2.8, 35 2.8, 50 1.8 Made in Japan
Contax: 50 1.4, 85 1.4
Zeiss: 135 2.0 Apo-Sonnar ZE
Leica-R: 180 3.4 Apo-Telyt-R (Leitax)
Rollei QBM: 135 2.8 Rolleinar (Leitax), 50 1.4 HFT
Canon: 50 1.8, 40 2.8
M42: Helios 50 2.0, Jupiter-37A, Jupiter-21 200 4.0
Binocular: Hensoldt & Wetzlar DF 8x30
http://andreaverdi.altervista.org/ Vivaldi lives in my lenses.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Orio
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 29545
Location: West Emilia
Expire: 2012-12-04
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Orio wrote:
| metallaro1980 wrote: |
therefore is it practically impossible to realize a objective with ca free ?
I have mistaken, I recognize my error ! |
A lens completely free from CA is called "achromatic" and it's only a theoretical lens, because so far it has been impossible to produce such a lens in reality.
Achromatic concept:
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acromatico
A lens with a much reduced to nearly absent CA is called Apochromatic, and it is currently produced by several manufacturers.
Apochromatic concept:
http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apocromatico
Regarding your comments, you seem to keep expecting top performance from cheap lenses. I'm sorry but this rarely happens, if ever. Yashica lenses are good lenses within their price range which is the cheap/affordable range.
They can not offer the performance of apochromatic lenses becuase they are not apochromatic, and if they were, they would not be cheap in price.
If you want to get lenses that are top quality, highly resolving and free from most optical problems, you need to spend the corresponding money.
We have already explained this concept, I gave you a list of high quality lenses, you keep insisting in wanting to get blood out of a turnip...
_________________
Orio, Administrator
T*
NE CEDE MALIS AUDENTIOR ITO
Ferrania film is reborn! http://www.filmferrania.it/
Support the Ornano film chemicals company and help them survive!
http://forum.mflenses.com/ornano-chemical-products-t55525.html |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6624
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 22, 2009 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
+1 to Orio.
I have some really good Yashicas, old ones and new ones. But that's not to say they'll be fantastic on a full frame 5D mark II. It is very widely accepted that serious money has to be spent to get lenses capable of matching the sensor's quality.
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Esox lucius
Joined: 26 Aug 2008
Posts: 2441
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 4:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Esox lucius wrote:
Posted a reply before I noticed page two...
I 100% agree with Orio. Shrek also repeats good lesson; It's not your sportscar to blame if you use tyres designed for family cars.
_________________
Vilhelm
Nikon DSLR: D4, D800, Nikon D3, D70
Nikon SLR: Nikon F100, Nikon FM2n
Nikkor MF: 20/2.8 Ai-S, 24/2 Ai-S, 24/2.8 Ai-S, 28/2 Ai-S, 28/2.8 Ai-S, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 Ai-S, 45/2.8 GN, 50/1.2 Ai, 50/1.2 Ai-S, 50/1.4 Ai, 50/1.4 Ai-S, 50/1.8 AI-S "long", 50/1.8 AI-S "short", 55/1.2 Ai, 85/1.4 Ai-S, 85/1.8H, 105/2.5 Ai, 135/2.8Q, 135/3.5 Ai, 180/2.8 Ai-S ED
Nikkor AF/AF-S FX: 14-24/2.8G, 16/2.8D Fisheye, 16-35/4G VR, 17-35/2.8D, 24/1.4G, 24/3.5D PC-E, 24/2.8D, 24-70/2.8G, 28/1.4D, 28/1.8G, 35/1.4G, 35/2D, 50/1.4D, 50/1.4G, 50/1.8G, 60/2.8 Micro, 60/2.8G Micro, 70-200/2.8G VR, 70-200/2.8G VR II, 80-400/4.5-5.6D VR, 85/1.4G, 85/2.8D PC-E Micro, 105/2D DC, 105/2.8G VR Micro, 135/2D DC, 200/2G VR, 200-400/4G VR, 300/2.8G VR, 300/4D ED, 400/2.8G VR, 800/5.6E VR
Nikkor AF/AF-S DX: 10.5/2.8G Fisheye, 12-24/4G, 18-70/3.5-4.5G
Topcor: Auto-Topcor 58/1.4,
Voigtländer SL: 40/2 Ultron, 58/1.4 Nokton, 75/2.5 Color-Heliar, 90/3.5 APO-Lanthar, 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar, 180/4 APO-Lanthar
Zeiss ZF: Planar T* 85/1.4 ZF
M42 SLR: Voigtländer Bessaflex TM
M42: Flektogon 20/4, Flektogon 35/2.4, Tessar 50/2.8 T, Super-Takumar 55/1.8, Biotar 58/2 T, Pentacon 135/2.8, Sonnar 135/3.5
Medium format: several Zeiss Super Ikonta 532/16 Opton-Tessar 80mm f/2.8, Zeiss Ikonta 524/16 Opton-Tessar 75mm f/3.5
Leica: R7, M4, Super-Angulon-R 4/21, Elmarit-R 2.8/28, Summicron-R 2/35, Summicron-M 2/35, Summicron-M 2/50, Elmarit-R 2,8/180 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
alex
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 561
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:44 am Post subject: Re: .... |
|
|
alex wrote:
| metallaro1980 wrote: |
for what i see ....
yashica lenses are not very good....
probably the 35mm and 24mm are only the 2 lenses better built of this japanese company !!! |
Uh. I have the 21, 24, 28, 35, 50 (all of 1.4, 1.7, 1.9, 2), 55/2.8, 135, 200, 300, 28-80, 28-85, 35-70, 35-105, 42-75, 70-150, 70-210, 75-200, 80-200, 100-300.
So I rather disagree.
_________________
Alex |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
