Home

Please support mflenses.com if you need any graphic related work order it from us, click on above banner to order!

SearchSearch MemberlistMemberlist RegisterRegister ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in

Worth the trouble?
View previous topic :: View next topic  


PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:14 pm    Post subject: Worth the trouble? Reply with quote

Hi,

Yesterday i bought a box cheap with some lenses an camera's .

pentacon 200mm f=4 gdr ( zebra stripes )( i'm a sucker fot zebra lenses)( why i bought the box).

fujica st 705 with fujinon.z 1:3.5-4.5 f=43-75 (m42) (oil on blades).
Auto mamiya/sekor 55mm 1:1.8 (m42)
Komura telemore 95 (m42)

nikon EM with osawa mark 2 mc 1: 3.5-4.5 35-70 mm (oil on blades).
nikon lens series E 28mm 2.8 (clean)

So, now i repaired the pentacon (the aperture blades where loose in the lens (putting them back with a tweezer cause previous owner damaged a screw).

is there any other things from this box worth repairing ?/ testing ?
or are they not worth the trouble ?.

Karel



PostPosted: Tue Apr 12, 2011 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very nice from you to rescue these great things!

Quote:
fujica st 705 with fujinon.z 1:3.5-4.5 f=43-75 (m42) (oil on blades).


Fujica ST 705 great camera, I expect good results from lens too.

Auto mamiya/sekor 55mm 1:1.8 (m42)

All 50-55mm lenses are good, surely a well known brand can be even better

Quote:
Komura telemore 95 (m42)

Usually M42 TC are not the best ones, pretty avarage I think.

Quote:
nikon EM


Nikon made perhaps best camera bodies, definetly worth to rescue it.

Quote:
osawa mark 2 mc 1: 3.5-4.5 35-70 mm (oil on blades).


I not expect much from an inexpensive third party zoom. Quiet possible waste time to repair it.

Quote:
nikon lens series E 28mm 2.8 (clean)


E series lenses are good even if they are inexpensive budget lenses.