View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 12:39 pm Post subject: Volna-9 vs. Voigtlander Nokton 58mm |
|
|
voe wrote:
I friend of mine borrowed me his Voigtlander Nokton 58mm for a week and I decided to compare it's bokeh characteristics with my Volna-9.
The Voigtlander Nokton is an all metal, manual focus lens based on the famous Topcor 58mm f/1.4 optical design and is made by Cosina. AFAIK the lens is available in Nikon and Pentax mount only. Inside the lens there is a built in chip which provides the metering compatibility.
Since not many people own both lenses, I decided to share the result for those who are interested.
Needless to say, I used custom white balance, MLU with two seconds delay and the camera was on a tripod.
First test scene shot at f/16 for reference:
Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4
Full size: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3272/2773442025_ca803b8471_o.jpg
Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 @2.8
Full size: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3056/2774538594_fb5516b3f5_o.jpg
Volna-9 at f/2.8
Full size: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3100/2773444011_3f2528c07d_o.jpg
Second test scene shot at f/16 for reference:
Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 @ f/1.4
Full size: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3285/2773437785_fe7bc82177_o.jpg
Voigtlander Nokton 58mm f/1.4 @ f/2.8
Full size: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3195/2774519118_25120c6701_o.jpg
Volna-9 at f/2.8
Full size: http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3211/2773440063_8e77a07375_o.jpg
After doing all the hard work I will leave the comments for the results to you:)
Hope it was helpful. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008 Posts: 16544 Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Excellent, thanks a lot for doing this!
The modern Nokton designs clearly shows its merits, but the Volna surprisingly enough is quite close (although poilu is right about the point of focus) _________________ Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
Last edited by kds315* on Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:42 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
Thanks for doing the comparison very interesting.
In some areas the fully OOF areas are better on the volna; the partly OOF areas and (in particular) the in-focus parts are clearly crisper, more saturated, and generally much better with the Nokton.
Is this the first or second batch? The first had some over-exposure issue (+2/3 ev), now corrected, and also some edge sharpness issues wide open which I also hear are improved in the second batch. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
the bokeh is the same for me
for the sharpness, the 2 lens have not the same focus point and comparison is difficult _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LucisPictor
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17633 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
Two wonderful lenses!
The Voigtländer is sharper at f2.8 than the Volna (of course!)
Both lenses show a creamy bokeh, but the highlight bokeh of the Voigtländer is a little harsh, the Volna show a velvet bokeh even in the highlights.
Anyway, I've got the Volna and would love to have the Voigtländer. _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
koji
Joined: 21 Jul 2008 Posts: 2106 Location: Hiroshima, Japan
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
koji wrote:
Very nice comparison, interesting result too.
Thanks for sharing. _________________ Our Home Page has 18,200 photos in 575 directories today.
Lenses: https://www.pbase.com/kkawakami/top_level_my_lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ballu
Joined: 28 Feb 2007 Posts: 912 Location: Columbus, OH. USofA
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ballu wrote:
Again.. nice comparision..
Nokton seems superb lens.... (not comparing with Volna, which has its own merits)... _________________ -Ballu
http://balyanpage.blogspot.com/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Laurence
Joined: 26 Mar 2007 Posts: 4809 Location: Western Washington State
Expire: 2016-06-19
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Laurence wrote:
There are just not many differences between these lenses! I do agree that the Volna shows more gradual and softer bokeh, and that the Nokton is marginally sharper in the focused areas.
But hey - if I only saw each of these individually, I would say "wonderful bokeh" and "wonderful sharpness" to both!
It would come down to a comparison of the price difference, versus the extra stop on the Nokton.
If I really needed the extra aperture I would go with the Nokton. But for me, and for the price, it would be the Volna.
Choices... _________________
Assent, and you are sane;
Demur,—you ’re straightway dangerous,
And handled with a chain.
Emily Dickinson
Cameras and Lenses in Use:
Yashica Mat 124 w/ Yashinon 80/3.5,
CV Apo-Lanthar 90/3.5SL, (Thank you Klaus),
Pentax 645,
Flek 50,
Pentax-A 150
Pentax-A 120 Macro
Voigtlander Vitomatic I w/Color Skopar 50/2.8
Konica TC and zoom lenses (thanks Carsten)
Contax AX
Yashica ML 50/2
Yashica ML 35/2.8
Carl Zeiss Contax 50/1.4
Tamron Adaptall SP 17/3.5
Tamron Adaptall 28/2.5
Tamron Adaptall SP 300/2.8 LD (IF)
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 6:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
This is a beautifully set up and presented comparison! Big Kudos for the contribution. I think as Carsten and Larry. Yes the modern lens is sharper but the volna drops away from the focus point more smoothly and has nicer highlights. That said I would not choose the Volna over the extra "POP" the sharper C/V lens has for most situations. _________________ Moderator |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
LucisPictor wrote: |
Two wonderful lenses!
The Voigtländer is sharper at f2.8 than the Volna (of course!) |
What surprised me was that the Voigtländer (at f/1.4) is sharper than the Volna (at f2.8).
LucisPictor wrote: |
Anyway, I've got the Volna and would love to have the Voigtländer. ;) |
I don't have either, but have considered long and hard about this Nokton. These samples take me one step closer to taking the plunge. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list)
Last edited by ChrisLilley on Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:14 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
poilu wrote: |
the bokeh is the same for me
for the sharpness, the 2 lens have not the same focus point and comparison is difficult |
Gosh! Could it be that small differences in the precise focus point have to be very carefully controlled, to make meaningful comparisons between lenses?
I agree, but weren't you saying that was "bullshit" the other week? _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
poilu
Joined: 26 Aug 2007 Posts: 10471 Location: Greece
Expire: 2019-08-29
|
Posted: Mon Aug 18, 2008 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
poilu wrote:
Chris wrote: |
Could it be that small differences in the precise focus point have to be very carefully controlled, to make meaningful comparisons between lenses? |
the focus of the Volna is on the shoes (backfocus)
as the dof is very small, it can make a small difference
I am sure the Nokton is better but not as much as the comparison between the faces
volna-nokton
Quote: |
I agree, but weren't you saying that was "bullshit" the other week? |
it is not exactly the same, last week writer conclude on superiority of AF based on "bullshit" theory _________________ T* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
poilu wrote: |
Chris wrote: |
Could it be that small differences in the precise focus point have to be very carefully controlled, to make meaningful comparisons between lenses? |
the focus of the Volna is on the shoes (backfocus)
as the dof is very small, it can make a small difference |
Yes, I know. And I was agreeing with you.
Quote: |
Chris wrote: |
I agree, but weren't you saying that was "bullshit" the other week? |
it is not exactly the same, last week writer conclude on superiority of AF based on "bullshit" theory |
No, if you think that then you missed the entire point. The writer concluded that, for lens tests (of MF or AF) they needed to do focus bracketing (using a movable platform, not using the AF) to ensure that small differences in focus point (such as the one you pointed out above) didn't bias the tests. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
Oh my...Oh my..... I've just ordered the Nokton. I could not help my self....I needed and I wanted this lens.. I know Volna-9 is good but a voice deep inside was telling me that I have to have the Nokton too;) (I am afraid this explanation is not going to be good enough for my wife) But the rendering is just so beautiful and the build quality is just great!
Now I will have to start selling the lenses that I don't use
Look at the big chunk of glass on the Nokton.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 1:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote: |
Is this the first or second batch? The first had some over-exposure issue (+2/3 ev), now corrected, and also some edge sharpness issues wide open which I also hear are improved in the second batch. |
On the front ring it says SL which should be the first batch, but there was a metering problem only with the Nikon mount Nokton lenses.
The one I just ordered is the SLII version so when I receive it if there is a public interest I can compare both versions to see how much better the second version is. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ChrisLilley
Joined: 01 Jan 2008 Posts: 1767 Location: Nice, France
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ChrisLilley wrote:
voe wrote: |
ChrisLilley wrote: |
Is this the first or second batch? The first had some over-exposure issue (+2/3 ev), now corrected, and also some edge sharpness issues wide open which I also hear are improved in the second batch. |
On the front ring it says SL which should be the first batch, but there was a metering problem only with the Nikon mount Nokton lenses. |
I meant batches of the SL2 model (ie current production, which the lens above is). The original Topcor had silver parts while the SL2 is all black (and has CPU couplings, on the Nikon version).
voe wrote: |
The one I just ordered is the SLII version so when I receive it if there is a public interest I can compare both versions to see how much better the second version is. |
I think you will find it looks the same as the one you borrowed. But if its brand new it may well be the second batch. Are you using it on a Pentax body?
Congratulations on your purchase, this looks like a fine lens and I hear very good reports about it. _________________ Camera (ˈkæ mə rə), n. Device for taking pictures in bright light
There are 10 kinds of people in the world: those who understand binary, and those who don’t. Key: Ai-P, Ai, Ai'ed, AiS
Camera: Nikon D90, D40, DK-21M eyepiece, ML-3 remote MF lenses: Nikkor 20mm f/4 K, AI'ed | N.K. Nikkor-N 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor-N.C 24mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 28mm f/2.8 AiS late model | Арсенал (Arsenal) Мир-24Н (Mir-24N) 35mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer Ultron SL II 40mm f/2.0 | Micro-Nikkor 55mm f/2.8 AiS | Zoom-Nikkor 80-200 f/4.5 Ai | ЛЗОС (LZOS) Юпитер-9 (Jupiter-9) 85mm f/2 | Cosina Voigtländer APO-Lanthar 90mm f/3.5 SL | Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5 pre-Ai, Ai'ed | Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/4 | Schneider Kreuznach Componon 105mm f/5.6 | Nikkor 135mm f/2.8, Ai'ed 1976 model | Nikkor 180mm f/2.8 ED AiS | Арсенал (Arsenal) ТЕЛЕАР-Н (Telear-n) 200mm f/3.5 | Nikkor 300 mm f/4.5 Ai (full equipment list) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE
Joined: 20 Aug 2007 Posts: 5486 Location: Left Coast
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
F16SUNSHINE wrote:
Congrats Voe. Your Pentax will love wearing this lens. I think you made a wise purchase |
|
Back to top |
|
|
voe
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 Posts: 138 Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 10:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
voe wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote: |
I meant batches of the SL2 model (ie current production, which the lens above is). The original Topcor had silver parts while the SL2 is all black (and has CPU couplings, on the Nikon version).
I think you will find it looks the same as the one you borrowed. But if its brand new it may well be the second batch. Are you using it on a Pentax body?
Congratulations on your purchase, this looks like a fine lens and I hear very good reports about it. |
I see what you mean:) Yes I'm going to use it on a Pentax K10D.
Thanks.
F16SUNSHINE wrote: |
Congrats Voe. Your Pentax will love wearing this lens. I think you made a wise purchase |
Thanks, I think my K10D very much enjoys the company of the Nokton. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|