| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
no-X
 Joined: 19 Jul 2008 Posts: 2495 Location: Budejky, Czech Republic
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sm0ky
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 3
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
sm0ky wrote:
Very nice samples of Volna-9 no-X |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sm0ky
Joined: 23 Dec 2008 Posts: 3
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
sm0ky wrote:
A starry shot of mine with the same Volna-9
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marty
 Joined: 09 Apr 2009 Posts: 767 Location: Italy
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marty wrote:
Hi,
@no-X: interesting comparison.
@sm0ky: nice portrait.
Marty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rawhead
 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
I need to go out with my Volna-9 more; I've only really taken it out once. I do like the bokeh, including the star bokeh circles in certain situations
A little camera shake due to low light and no-flash policy at the museum
 _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
patrickh
 Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 8551 Location: Oregon
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 13, 2009 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
patrickh wrote:
Love this lens - it behaves far better than one would expect and is great value. This is a second thread on a quirky lens - see the Trioplan thread.
Thanks for the extremely comprehensible series of examples.
patrickh _________________ DSLR: Nikon D300 Nikon D200 Nex 5N
MF Zooms: Kiron 28-85/3.5, 28-105/3.2, 75-150/3.5, Nikkor 50-135/3.5 AIS // MF Primes: Nikkor 20/4 AI, 24/2 AI, 28/2 AI, 28/2.8 AIS, 28/3.5 AI, 35/1.4 AIS, 35/2 AIS, 35/2.8 PC, 45/2.8 P, 50/1.4 AIS, 50/1.8 AIS, 50/2 AI, 55/2.8 AIS micro, 55/3.5 AI micro, 85/2 AI, 100/2,8 E, 105/1,8 AIS, 105/2,5 AIS, 135/2 AIS, 135/2.8 AIS, 200/4 AI, 200/4 AIS micro, 300/4.5 AI, 300/4.5 AI ED, Arsat 50/1.4, Kiron 28/2, Vivitar 28/2.5, Panagor 135/2.8, Tamron 28/2.5, Tamron 90/2.5 macro, Vivitar 90/2.5 macro (Tokina) Voigtlander 90/3.5 Vivitar 105/2.5 macro (Kiron) Kaleinar 100/2.8 AI Tamron 135/2.5, Vivitar 135/2.8CF, 200/3.5, Tokina 400/5,6
M42: Vivitar 28/2.5, Tamron 28/2.5, Formula5 28/2.8, Mamiya 28/2.8, Pentacon 29/2.8, Flektogon 35/2.4, Flektogon 35/2.8, Takumar 35/3.5, Curtagon 35/4, Takumar 50/1.4, Volna-6 50/2.8 macro, Mamiya 50/1.4, CZJ Pancolar 50/1,8, Oreston 50/1.8, Takumar 50/2, Industar 50/3.5, Sears 55/1.4, Helios 58/2, Jupiter 85/2, Helios 85/1.5, Takumar 105/2.8, Steinheil macro 105/4.5, Tamron 135/2.5, Jupiter 135/4, CZ 135/4, Steinheil Culminar 135/4,5, Jupiter 135/3.5, Takumar 135/3.5, Tair 135/2.8, Pentacon 135/2.8, CZ 135/2.8, Taika 135/3.5, Takumar 150/4, Jupiter 200/4, Takumar 200/4
Exakta: Topcon 100/2.8(M42), 35/2.8, 58/1.8, 135/2.8, 135/2.8 (M42), Kyoei Acall 135/3.5
C/Y: Yashica 28/2.8, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, Zeiss Planar 50/1.4, Distagon 25/2.8
Hexanon: 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 40/1.8, 50/1.7, 52/1.8, 135/3.2, 135/3.5, 35-70/3.5, 200/3.5
P6 : Mir 38 65/3.5, Biometar 80/2.8, Kaleinar 150/2.8, Sonnar 180/2.8
Minolta SR: 28/2.8, 28/3.5, 35/2.8, 45/2, 50/2, 58/1.4, 50/1.7, 135/2.8, 200/3.5
RF: Industar 53/2.8, Jupiter 8 50/2
Enlarg: Rodagon 50/5,6, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, Vario 44-52/4, 150/5.6 180/5.6 El Nikkor 50/2,8,63/2.8,75/4, 80/5,6, 105/5.6, 135/5.6 Schneider 60/5.6, 80/5.6, 80/4S,100/5.6S,105/5.6,135/5.6, 135/5.6S, 150/5.6S, Leica 95/4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
my_photography
 Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
Interesting observation. How can the lens changes its "shaped" in such manner? Any explanation? Amd is this one of the reason why a lot of the forum members have many many different copies of 50mm? _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rawhead
 Joined: 09 Feb 2009 Posts: 1525 Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 8:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
| my_photography wrote: |
| Interesting observation. How can the lens changes its "shaped" in such manner? Any explanation? Amd is this one of the reason why a lot of the forum members have many many different copies of 50mm? |
Aperture blades on a lot of lenses change their overall shapes as they go from wide upen to smallest aperture. Some of them start out roundish, then become hexagonal (or some other very distinct polygon), some of them are clearly one polygon from start to finish, and others––mostly the multi-bladed ones with more than a dozen blades, are round from beginning to end.
The Volna-9 (as well as some other russian glass, like Industar-61, Helios-40) happen to have aperture blades that are put together so that their shapes become star-like at certain apertures, usually around 5.6-8.
And yeah, I would definitely say the different bokeh qualities are one of the reasons I have many 50s. _________________ Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
my_photography
 Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 16, 2009 9:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
[quote="rawhead
Aperture blades on a lot of lenses change their overall shapes as they go from wide upen to smallest aperture. Some of them start out roundish, then become hexagonal (or some other very distinct polygon), some of them are clearly one polygon from start to finish, and others––mostly the multi-bladed ones with more than a dozen blades, are round from beginning to end.
The Volna-9 (as well as some other russian glass, like Industar-61, Helios-40) happen to have aperture blades that are put together so that their shapes become star-like at certain apertures, usually around 5.6-8.
[/quote]
Thanks for the explaination. The only Russian lens I have is the Zenith, which I do not think have this type of wonderful characteristic. Will definitely keep an eye on some of the wonderful Russian lens in the future. _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivier
 Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5096 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Here are the iris of Volna-9 and Industar-61 :
http://www.mflenses.com/index.php/Industar/Industar-61-vs-Volna-9-by-Tom-Tiger.html
Really special...
As far as I am concerned, I await the Industar and I am very excited to discover how it works (well I believe). _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkIII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
djmike
 Joined: 01 Apr 2009 Posts: 930 Location: Taiwan
|
 Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
djmike wrote:
Love this special iris. _________________
DSLR: Canon 400D
SLR: Nikon FM2 + Canon A-1 + Canon AE1-P + Praktica MTL-5B + Pentax Spotmatic F + Fujica ST801 + Voigtlander Bassematic + Voigtlander Vito + Rollei 35S + Rolleiflex SL35 ME + Canon QL17 GIII + Olympus Pen EE-3
Lenses
M42: CZJ Flektogon 35/2.4 + CZJ Flektogon Zebra 35/2.8 + CZJ Pancolar 50/1.8 + CZJ Sonnar 135/3.5 + CZJ Tessar 50/2.8 Chrome + Pentacon 135/2.8 + Pentacon 50/1.8 + SMC Takumar 50/1.4 + SMC Takumar 55/2 + SMC Takumar 135/3.5 + Fujinon 55/1.8 + Jupiter-9 85/2 + Jupiter-37A 135/3.5 + Helios 44-6 58/2
Nikor: Nikkor 50/1.4 + Nikkor 28/3.5 + Nikkor 35-105 Zoom + 36-72 Series E Zoom
Canon: Canon FD + 28/2.8 + 50/1.8 + Canon 35-105 Macro Zoom
Other: Rollei Planar HFT 50/1.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
siudym
 Joined: 27 Jun 2015 Posts: 122 Location: Poland
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
siudym wrote:
my volna-9 on fuji s3 pro, f5.6:
#1
#2
 _________________ https://www.flickr.com/photos/siudym
https://www.youtube.com/@lucassdmsiudym7707/videos |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marino24
 Joined: 11 Feb 2016 Posts: 84 Location: italy
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Tue Apr 05, 2016 9:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
marino24 wrote:
Volna 9 f/5.6 almoust at minimum distance of focus
https://flic.kr/p/z6vdsG |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olivier
 Joined: 18 Feb 2009 Posts: 5096 Location: France
Expire: 2015-08-06
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2016 7:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olivier wrote:
Yes, very nice results with this very good lens. _________________ Olivier - Moderator
Dslr : Olympus Pen E-P2 - Fujifilm X-Pro2 - Canon 5D MkIII.
SLr and MF lenses : for feedback and helping people, cameras and lenses I own : full list here http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic,p,1442740.html#1442740 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|