View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 6:23 pm Post subject: Vivitar 2X Macro Focusing Teleconverter-made in M42? |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Vivitar 2X Macro Focusing Teleconverter-made in M42? (incase the title is cutoff)
Just thought this might save me some time- we're talking about this one:
I've searched on eBay, but then went onto Google images for a broader search, but couldn't find anything. Wondering if there's a simple answer. All I've found are bayonet-mount versions.
I know you can break out the DIY work and put whatever mount on it, but it would be convenient to use with an M42 slim adapter. Panagor's came in M42 but it was internal focus. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
If you want to use it with m42 lenses you can use a PK version with an m42 to PK adapter (the one that sits flush with the mount) _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1432 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 7:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
I believe that specific Vivitar / Kenko / Teleplus 2x macro teleconverter post-dates the popularity of the M42 mount and hence was never issued in M42. Use some adapters like pentaxian suggested. If it is just the focus helicoid you are after a couple of mm for an M42 adapter probably won't matter. _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 7:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
I believe that specific Vivitar / Kenko / Teleplus 2x macro teleconverter post-dates the popularity of the M42 mount and hence was never issued in M42. Use some adapters like pentaxian suggested. If it is just the focus helicoid you are after a couple of mm for an M42 adapter probably won't matter. |
I was thinking more for the rear interface, adapting any lens to the front is absolutely fine really.
And yeah- some lenses seem to have been issued in M42 even after their popularity had gone (after 1979?), especially third parties. Maybe this wasn't one of them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
Probably the screw mount market had gotten too small by then for a m42 convertor to be made as well. Especially a more expensive one with 7 elements. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009 Posts: 7796 Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
That looks very similat to the Macro Teleplus MC7 adapter, I have them in FD & PK mount and they are very good, but I don't know if they did a M42 version?
There are plenty of X2 and X3 Teleconverters for M42, I haven't seen a macro focusing one though. _________________ LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst
Joined: 04 Jul 2011 Posts: 504 Location: Santa Clara, CA, USA
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 10:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ray Parkhurst wrote:
I've been searching for a M42 version for years, but have not come across one. Someone told me that they were indeed made in M42, but I think they were probably confused and what they meant was "Pentax" mount, ie PK, not M42.
I will keep looking though. Nobody has ever confirmed that they were not made in M42. _________________ ...See my Numismatic Photography website at: http://www.macrocoins.com
...Primary Studio Cameras: Sony A7Rm4 and Canon HRT2i
...Go-To studio lenses: Nikon 95mm and 105mm Printing-Nikkors; Schneider 85mm Macro-Varon; Nikon 5x, 10x, and 20x Measuring Microscope Objectives; Mitutoyo BD Plan Apo 50x Microscope Objective
...My Go-To Walkaround Lenses: Laowa 60mm Super Macro; Nikon 28-105D (in manual mode for macro); |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3678 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2022 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
I have 2 of these excellent converters (Minolta MD and Nikon). M42 lenses are perfectly usable on the Minolta one with the original Minolta P-adapter and the MD converter is adaptable to any mirrorless digital camera.
Same is true for the PK version as already mentioned before.
I don't see really the point to look for a M42 version of this converter. _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I've got a dozen or more copies of this converter (the helicoids are useful, after stripping out the optics) and have never seen an M42 one. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RokkorDoctor
Joined: 27 Nov 2021 Posts: 1432 Location: Kent, UK
Expire: 2025-05-01
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
RokkorDoctor wrote:
Lloydy wrote: |
That looks very similat to the Macro Teleplus MC7 adapter, I have them in FD & PK mount and they are very good, but I don't know if they did a M42 version?
There are plenty of X2 and X3 Teleconverters for M42, I haven't seen a macro focusing one though. |
If my understanding/research is correct, all of these 2x macro focusing teleconverters (Vivitar / Teleplus / Kenko) are the same apart from some cosmetic changes, all made by Kenko, i.e. Tokina. _________________ Mark
SONY A7S, A7RII + dust-sealed modded Novoflex/Fotodiox/Rayqual MD-NEX adapters
Minolta SR-1, SRT-101/303, XD7/XD11, XGM, X700
Bronica SQAi
Ricoh GX100
Minolta majority of all Rokkor SR/AR/MC/MD models made
Sigma 14mm/3.5 for SR mount
Tamron SP 60B 300mm/2.8 (Adaptall)
Samyang T-S 24mm/3.5 (Nikon mount, DIY converted to SR mount)
Schneider-Kreuznach PC-Super-Angulon 28mm/2.8 (SR mount)
Bronica PS 35/40/50/65/80/110/135/150/180/200/250mm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DConvert
Joined: 12 Jun 2010 Posts: 921 Location: Essex UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 9:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
DConvert wrote:
Likewise I've never seen the Vivitar/Kenko type inM42 but I think the Panagor type which doesn't focus to infinity was made in M42 (I have such a copy coming in the post, and should be able to confirm once it arrives)
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
Lloydy wrote: |
That looks very similat to the Macro Teleplus MC7 adapter, I have them in FD & PK mount and they are very good, but I don't know if they did a M42 version?
There are plenty of X2 and X3 Teleconverters for M42, I haven't seen a macro focusing one though. |
If my understanding/research is correct, all of these 2x macro focusing teleconverters (Vivitar / Teleplus / Kenko) are the same apart from some cosmetic changes, all made by Kenko, i.e. Tokina. |
My pair of 2x macro teleconverters look to be more different than I'd expect from a rebrand, but I've not looked at them side by side. One is a Teleplus but can't remember the other brand. IIRC the clubman model I had was a 3x macro TC, which was obviously very different. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 11:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
RokkorDoctor wrote: |
Lloydy wrote: |
That looks very similat to the Macro Teleplus MC7 adapter, I have them in FD & PK mount and they are very good, but I don't know if they did a M42 version?
There are plenty of X2 and X3 Teleconverters for M42, I haven't seen a macro focusing one though. |
If my understanding/research is correct, all of these 2x macro focusing teleconverters (Vivitar / Teleplus / Kenko) are the same apart from some cosmetic changes, all made by Kenko, i.e. Tokina. |
I think it originated as Kiron There is a Kiron MC7 2x teleconverter. The Vivitar ads a Helicoid to that. Later Tokina also used the formula. Vivitar had relations with both Kino and Tokina so I guess either could have made it, but it doesn't have the tell tale silver ring with red dot Tokinas have at the mount. So my guess is Kino. _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagecameras
Joined: 19 Feb 2011 Posts: 104 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:01 pm Post subject: Re: Vivitar 2X Macro Focusing Teleconverter-made in M42? |
|
|
heritagecameras wrote:
eggplant wrote: |
Vivitar 2X Macro Focusing Teleconverter-made in M42? (incase the title is cutoff)
I've searched on eBay, but then went onto Google images for a broader search, but couldn't find anything. Wondering if there's a simple answer. All I've found are bayonet-mount versions. I know you can break out the DIY work and put whatever mount on it, but it would be convenient to use with an M42 slim adapter. Panagor's came in M42 but it was internal focus. |
I don't remember ever seeing this macro tele converter (or any of its clones) in M42 either.
However... the Panagor equivalent certainly was made in M42 screw:
https://www.photographyobsession.co.uk/gallery3/photo-equip/panagor
Note, though, that this one is for macro only and doesn't focus to infinity. If you're using the helicoid for something else that may not matter. The feel of the focusing action isn't nearly as smooth as the Vivitar. _________________ Dave, HCL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
I'll be wanting to use this as a helicoid for a lens, and to my knowledge the Panagor is internal focus.
This means I can't use it- like the Vivitar / Kenko Teleplus everyone is familiar with.
Now, that being said, I'm sure I could figure out how to connect a lens to the internal part. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagecameras
Joined: 19 Feb 2011 Posts: 104 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heritagecameras wrote:
eggplant wrote: |
I'll be wanting to use this as a helicoid for a lens, and to my knowledge the Panagor is internal focus.
This means I can't use it- like the Vivitar / Kenko Teleplus everyone is familiar with.
Now, that being said, I'm sure I could figure out how to connect a lens to the internal part. |
Yes, you're right - it is internal. _________________ Dave, HCL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagecameras
Joined: 19 Feb 2011 Posts: 104 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heritagecameras wrote:
How about this Pentax helicoid?
https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/403583833501 _________________ Dave, HCL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
No need to destroy these converters for that. There is plenty of focussing helicoids for m42 on Ali in different sizes: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/32813001672.html _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
That is probably not original Pentax is the Pentax is called "Variable Close-Up Ring"
http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=41205 _________________ pentaxian |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
As an addition, from the looks of things you could only use narrow 16mm projection lenses where the teleconverter glass would go.
I'm not sure if anyone's done this, but you could disassemble it further and see if you can remove the whole internals. Then see how the narrow middle part attaches to the outer helicoid. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
heritagecameras
Joined: 19 Feb 2011 Posts: 104 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
heritagecameras wrote:
Two versions according to this page:
http://takumar.weebly.com/macro-accessories.html _________________ Dave, HCL |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
Who wants to use an old teleconverter? Yes I know it's good, but the value in a quality, non-rotating helicoid is even higher. Those new ones are shite quality for the money.
The price of one of these new would be very expensive. And I would understand this POV more if they weren't extremely common.
If that's an argument you can't stomach, then you can atleast appreciate that I have a need for the non-rotating feature-
I'm going to use this with an enlarger lens. Stopping it down would throw the focus off with a rotating helicoid. This discounts the m42 aliexpress one and the Pentax Variable Close-up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
And if you wanted to use most vintage lenses with a quality teleconverter I would just adapt them to EF. No it is not the same as a focusable teleconverter and you'd need extension tubes, but the quality would be there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
D1N0
Joined: 07 Aug 2012 Posts: 2536
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
D1N0 wrote:
No just don't destroy them I forbid it. You are canceled _________________ pentaxian
Last edited by D1N0 on Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:09 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Thu Apr 07, 2022 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
I am not destroying them. They are being disassembled with the proper tools, and I aim for all my work to be reversible.
A modification that's reversible is the sort of thing that's worth recommending to people and posting about, because it's more accessible. So for instance removing the part which connects the helicoid to the inner teleconverter optics and seeing if I could attach a wider opening instead. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
eggplant
Joined: 27 May 2020 Posts: 517
|
Posted: Fri Apr 08, 2022 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
eggplant wrote:
I learnt the following people made macro-focusing teleconverters:
(Vivitar rebrand?)
(Kenko teleplus rebrand?)
(their own, interesting, creation)
(Makinon rebrand methinks) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|