View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Russ
Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 432
|
Posted: Sat Apr 26, 2008 3:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Russ wrote:
ChrisLilley wrote: |
Russ wrote: |
But optically, it ROCKS! In testing, it handily beat out the Nikon 180mm lens.
|
Pointer to that test? |
I'm looking for the site. I printed out the test result numbers, just have to relocate the actual site. I was quite surprised myself. I've only used my Viv S-1 200, a couple of times, but the slides sure looked good.
Kiron Kid |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jekku
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Posts: 42 Location: Turku, Finland
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 10:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jekku wrote:
Bump for this.
Someone is selling this lens on a Finnish camera forum for 100€.
A bit overpriced perhaps?
Don't know who manufactured it though. _________________ Your everyday tourist.
--------------------------
WWW: niklasjerva.net
Blog: Photographical strut
Photos: flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Pricing is dependent on type of mount. I don't suppose the AF version would command as much as a MF version. I have seen the MF version; the Series 1 f/3, go for well over $200 in M42 mount. Other mounts are usually considerably less money.
I too would like to see the aforementioned test results. I have the f/3 lens and love it; it's one of my three favorite manual lenses. On my camera it has considerable purple fringing which I think is a sensor/camera specific thing. Boomer has used this lens on his Canon with much less issue. Nevertheless, I've found the fringing very easy to correct in post processing. Other than that, focusing can be difficult and needs to be precise. I had trouble with it initially, but have gotten quite good, so it must have been something that I just needed to get accustomed to through practice. The lens is very sharp and the bokeh excellent.
If interested, I have a gallery of sample pictures here:
http://www.pbase.com/mdlempert/vivitar200mms1
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Jekku
Joined: 11 Sep 2009 Posts: 42 Location: Turku, Finland
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Jekku wrote:
Thanks for your input and info.
Forgot to mention it's a Nikon MF mount. So maybe that's the reason.
The seller says it's a Viv 200/3.5.
Here's a pic from the seller:
_________________ Your everyday tourist.
--------------------------
WWW: niklasjerva.net
Blog: Photographical strut
Photos: flickr |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Wed May 19, 2010 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Okay, I've gone back and looked and see now how the subject has gone astray. You did ask initially about the standard f3.5 lens, but then someone introduced the Series 1 AF as an option. I added onto that discussion. The lens you are asking about is the very common 200mm f/3.5 of which most were made by Komine. I'm not so sure the price is anything special. Check on ebay - there are usually many listed, and even better yet, check completed listings for any Nikon mounts that have sold. When i was looking, I saw them in Minolta mount for $10-$20. An M42 will go somewhat higher.
As for the quality of the lens, many people speak well of it. I have two; one in Minolta mount that I've had since the 70s, and one in M42 purchased more recently. Since I have the Series 1 lens, I don't use the M42 version anymore as it didn't strike me as anything outstanding, but was certainly a good lens. However, I do use the Minolta mount one on occasion for close up photography. I have found that when used with a macro converter it performs quite well. I should also mention that the macro converter I use is actually the match mated one sold with the Series 1 90mm. It just works well with other lenses.
The gallery I have with close up picture from the f3.5 lens can be seen here: http://www.pbase.com/mdlempert/vivitar200mm
_________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
The Komine built Vivitar 200mm f3.5 gives pretty good results with a pleasing saturation....but I really don't see it it being anywhere in the league of the Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED AIS or the suburb Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED-IF AF or the ED-IF D...
Nikkor 180mm f2.8 ED AI-S 100% crop & shot through the glass of a window
Vivitar 200mm f3.5
The Vivitar Series 1 200mm f3 however has a particular uniqueness and a pleasing bokeh wide open...and close focuses to 1.2 meters
Stopping down sharpens at the next stop and continues to get sharper til f11 100% crop & shot through the glass of a window.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
woodrim
Joined: 14 Jan 2010 Posts: 4060 Location: Charleston
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
woodrim wrote:
Boomer: Good to see you here again. Are you still having good experience regarding the blue/purple fringing? _________________ Regards,
Woodrim |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Spring is here...so been busy here and up at Marrowstone....and the weather has also been good for some excellent spring sailing....actually as mild as our winter was,the sailing has been great since last spring.
I usually try to avoid a bright harsh background...but sometimes no matter how careful, I do get some aberrations.
_________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
a20010494
Joined: 15 Feb 2010 Posts: 396 Location: Perú.
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
a20010494 wrote:
I'm not trying to bash, but to my eye the in-focus area of the vivitar looks sharper than nikon's. _________________ www.estudiocaleidoscopio.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Boomer Depp
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 Posts: 552 Location: Kingston,Washighton
Expire: 2011-12-04
|
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Boomer Depp wrote:
Probably had more time to nail the focus,but could have done better if I had more time to really nail the focus or used a flash....hummingbirds don't sit still to often and it presented itself well for the DOF in the shot... and depending on the time of day and the amount of harsh lighting nearer mid-day as well as keeping an angle closer to 45 degrees shooting through a window all come into play...and the 180 was probably wide open,while the 200 was stopped down a stop or so...
Both lenses have there weaknesses...the ED AI-S has just a hint of CA as you stop down shooting digitally,and is susceptible to flare and ghosts on film and digitally....neither lens likes a bright contrasty background,but the Nikkor handles it better wide open then the Vivitar. _________________ Trust that little voice in your head that says "Wouldn't it be interesting if...." And then do it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|