| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
cellotone
Joined: 13 Apr 2014
Posts: 317
Location: US
Expire: 2020-09-24
|
 Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 8:56 am Post subject: Angenieux 70-210mm f3.5 Lens |
 |
|
cellotone wrote:
Angenieux 70-210mm f3.5 + Nikon D600.
Pictures were taken while walking at park this afternoon. @ f3.5:
f3.5, ISO-1600
[url=http://forum.mflenses.com/userpix/20148/big_8065_DSC_4847_copyjpgnamed_1.jpg]
 [/url]
f3.5, ISO-2000
@ f5.6, ISO-320, 1/1600 sec.
Last edited by cellotone on Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:19 am; edited 5 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
invisible
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 343
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
invisible wrote:
This is a lens I wouldn't mind in my bag  (but my Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 Kiron doesn't suck either). I think photo #1 makes it shine – the lens looks pretty sharp wide open, and the blurred background looks creamy. My non-pixel-peeping eye can't find any aberrations.
Did you shoot these handheld? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cellotone
Joined: 13 Apr 2014
Posts: 317
Location: US
Expire: 2020-09-24
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cellotone wrote:
| invisible wrote: |
This is a lens I wouldn't mind in my bag (but my Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 Kiron doesn't suck either). I think photo #1 makes it shine – the lens looks pretty sharp wide open, and the blurred background looks creamy. My non-pixel-peeping eye can't find any aberrations.
Did you shoot these handheld? |
Hi, thank you for the nice words... I haven't used it for a while, but it always brings me surprise. The Vivitar Series-1 105/2.5 Macro is the only Vivitar I have, which is a great lens. Have you posted pictures taken with your vivitar 70-210/3.5? I would love to learn it.
Yes, these are hand-held shots. The #3, #4, and #5 ISO was set high (#3-1600, #4 & 5-2000) in order to get the speed. You probably can notice the noise.
_________________
Nikon D600, Fujifilm X-E1, Sony A7R,
Leica R lenses, C/Y Zeiss lenses
Last edited by cellotone on Tue Aug 05, 2014 3:21 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
invisible
Joined: 06 Jun 2013
Posts: 343
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
invisible wrote:
| cellotone wrote: |
| invisible wrote: |
This is a lens I wouldn't mind in my bag (but my Vivitar Series 1 70-210/3.5 Kiron doesn't suck either). I think photo #1 makes it shine – the lens looks pretty sharp wide open, and the blurred background looks creamy. My non-pixel-peeping eye can't find any aberrations.
Did you shoot these handheld? |
Hi, thank you for the nice words... I haven't used it for a while, but it always brings me surprise. The Vivitar Series-1 105/2.5 Macro is a great lens, that is the only Vivitar I have. Have you posted pictures taken with your vivitar 70-210/3.5? I would love to learn it.
Yes, these are hand-held shots. The last three ISO was set high (#3-1600, #4 & 5-2000) in order to get the speed. You probably can notice the noise. |
I haven't posted images taken with my Vivitar 70-210/3.5, but here's a fairly recent thread with samples: http://forum.mflenses.com/vivitar-series-1-70-210-3-5-ver-1-kiron-t66110.html
I figured these were handheld shots – in particular, your last photo looks either not too sharp as a result of slight motion blur, or the focus was missed, or maybe both... Things that a tripod would have helped prevent. I did not notice the noise though – the D600 has really good high-ISO performance.
If you ever decide to get rid of this lens, let me know |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
cellotone
Joined: 13 Apr 2014
Posts: 317
Location: US
Expire: 2020-09-24
|
| Posted: Sat Aug 02, 2014 6:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cellotone wrote:
I added one more picture, so the "last one" you referred now is the #5.
I tried to focus at the center of the flower (picture #5). But obviously, it's not clear (seems focused bit back of the center of the flower). Not sure it was my hands was shaking, the flower was weaving because the wind (it was @ f3.5, 1/80 sec.), or the DOF was too narrow... I did take several shoots, they were same. I am somewhat like its nebulosity of the flower, especially the B&W one, so posted it.
I will try to shoot one at relatively narrow aperture and use a tripod next time. Thank you for your advice.
I may sell it when the price gets doubled. LOL!
_________________
Nikon D600, Fujifilm X-E1, Sony A7R,
Leica R lenses, C/Y Zeiss lenses |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
