View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007 Posts: 3168 Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
Posted: Fri Nov 18, 2011 11:49 pm Post subject: Spiratone 17mm f3.5 |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
Did not know Spiratone has one in this range
Click here to see on Ebay
Tokina in disguised?
Click here to see on Ebay |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
Can't be 100% sure from that one pic but it sure does look like the Tokina 3.5/17 which is a great lens. _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57849 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Can't be 100% sure from that one pic but it sure does look like the Tokina 3.5/17 which is a great lens. |
+1 _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Spotmatic
Joined: 18 Aug 2008 Posts: 4045 Location: Netherlands
|
Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2011 7:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
Spotmatic wrote:
It's definitely a Tokina! _________________ Peter - Moderator
Pentax K-5 + Pentax 645 + Canon 5D + Bessa RF 10,5cm Heliar, and a 'little' bag full of MF lenses. The lens list is * here *.
My fast 80s: Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 83mm f/1.9 - Super-Takumar 85mm f/1.9 - FA 77mm f/1.8 Limited - Cyclop 85/1.5 (Helios-40 innards) - Komura 80mm f/1.8 - Meyer Görlitz Primoplan 7,5cm 1:1.9 - Carl Zeiss Jena 80mm f/1.8 Pancolar - Canon 85mm f/1.8 S.S.C. - Canon 85mm f/1.2 S.S.C. Aspherical |
|
Back to top |
|
|
significantimagery
Joined: 20 Apr 2013 Posts: 75 Location: Kansas City
|
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 2:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
significantimagery wrote:
I've had this lens for about a year.
It is the exact same lens as the Spiratone 18mm.
I read that the measured focal length is around 17.5mm which is why they could choose to brand it as a 17mm or a 18mm.
I've had moments where I didn't like this lens because I had not yet learned to quit trying to use it indoors in low light conditions and expect good results. Definitely much better suited for outside.
Worth noting that this is the softest lens I have ever seen at f/3.5.
It also produces interesting rainbow flares shooting into the light:
Slow, soft, crazy flares, doesn't perform as good as a cheap modern 18-55 kit lens for many situations. Terrible for low-light because it's much better stopped down.
Believe it or not, lately I've actually been using this lens with a large element Neewer 0.43x super wide angle attachment on it and have been enjoying it.
The corners are blurred a bit in that configuration which can be interesting for effect at times, but mainly I've been shooting video with it using a 2.35:1 cinescope crop so the corners get chopped off anyway. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hifisapi
Joined: 25 Sep 2012 Posts: 941 Location: USA
|
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
hifisapi wrote:
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Can't be 100% sure from that one pic but it sure does look like the Tokina 3.5/17 which is a great lens. |
I had the rmc tokina for a while and wouldnt call it great. it was sharp and contrasty stopped down but not wide open. and even on apsc it had visible barrel distortion. _________________ ===========
ACQUIRED OVER 30 YEARS:
Cameras: DSLR=Pentax istDS FILM=Pentax SP, SP-F, ESII, SP1000, KX, K2
Lenses : Pentax M42 = Super Multi Coated Takumars 50/1.4 55/1.8 100/4-BELLOWS 500/4.5 1000/8 135-600/6.7 Pentax PK= SMC Pentax-Ks K17/4-FF Fisheye K18/3.5 K20/4 K24/3.5 K28/3.5 K28/2 K35/3.5 K35/2 K50/1.2 K50/1.4K 50/4-MACROK 55/1.8 K85/1.8 K100/4-MACRO K100/4-BELLOWS K105/2.8 K120/2.8 K135/3.5 K135/2.5 K150/4 K200/4 K400/5.6 K45-125/4K 85-210/4.5 Pentax PKM = SMC Pentax-M M40/2.8-Pancake M50/1.4 M75-150/4 M80-200/4.5 Pentax PKA= SMC Pentax-A A15/3.5 A50/2.8-MACRO A28/2 A35/2 A50/1.4 A135/2.8 A200/4 A*300/4 A35-105/3.5 A24-50/4 A70-210/4 TAMRON AD2= SP80-200/2.8 SP180/2.5 TOKINA AT-X PK= ATX28-85/3.5-4.5 ATX35-70/2.8 ATX60-120/2.8 ATX80-200/2.8 ATX100-300/4 ATX90/2.5 MACRO KIRON-LESTER DINE PK = 105/2.8-MACRO VIVITAR PK = 135/2.8-MACRO 28-85/4 NOFLEXAR AUTOBELLOWS PK = 60/4 105/4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
480sparky
Joined: 16 Apr 2013 Posts: 355 Location: Iowa
|
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 6:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
480sparky wrote:
At f/8 and below, I can't tell the difference between it and my Nikkor 17-35/2.8 AF-D. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15685
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Thu Nov 21, 2013 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
hifisapi wrote: |
iangreenhalgh1 wrote: |
Can't be 100% sure from that one pic but it sure does look like the Tokina 3.5/17 which is a great lens. |
I had the rmc tokina for a while and wouldnt call it great. it was sharp and contrasty stopped down but not wide open. and even on apsc it had visible barrel distortion. |
My copy is adequately sharp wide open, but it's probably a good copy. Of course it has barrel distortion, you don't seriously expect a 17mm lens to not have some? _________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|