| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
blende8
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
 Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:17 pm Post subject: What is the smallest M42 135mm lens? |
 |
|
blende8 wrote:
What is the smallest screw mount M42 135mm lens that you know?
I am wondering because all the ones I see are rather large ...
... compared to the Pentax M 135/3.5, which is only
66mm in length (without bajonett) and
60mm in diameter and
270 g in weight.
_________________
Best wishes, Wieland
K-1, K-5IIs
Pentax, mysterium quod absconditum fuit ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I have the tiny Fujita 135/4.5 in M42 mount, like this one:
http://forum.mflenses.com/fujita-135mm-f-4-5-m37-mount-samples-t26704,highlight,fujita.html
Can't imagine a smaller one!
_________________
Graham - Moderator 
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 7:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
Is that a native M42 or an adapter? The example you show is M37. Is it smaller than the TAMRON TWIN-TELE (which also has an adapter)? Mine measures 68mm long to front of adapter, 48mm max diameter, weighing in at 208g. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stingOM
Joined: 27 Sep 2007
Posts: 3168
Location: Ireland
Expire: 2012-12-27
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stingOM wrote:
I would have thought that the Zuiko version is the smallest  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
visualopsins
Joined: 05 Mar 2009
Posts: 10597
Location: California
Expire: 2025-04-11
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Smallest I have is Takumar 1:3.5/135 (preset), 52x95mm, 327g.
No prize 
_________________
☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
| martyn_bannister wrote: |
Is that a native M42 or an adapter? The example you show is M37. Is it smaller than the TAMRON TWIN-TELE (which also has an adapter)? Mine measures 68mm long to front of adapter, 48mm max diameter, weighing in at 208g. |
That's not my copy  Mine has an M42 mount.
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Mal1905
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 1705
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Expire: 2011-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mal1905 wrote:
I've got a Dollonds-S 3.5/135 which is the smallest 135mm lens I've ever seen - check it out
_________________
Canon EOS 5D / EOS 40D
Carl Zeiss Jena: Flektogon 2.8/20, 2.4/35, 2.8/35, Pancolar 2/50, MC 1.8/50, MC 1.8/80, Triotar 4/135, Tessar 2.8/50, S 4/135 1Q, S 3.5/135, Sonnar 3.5/135 MC, 2.8/180, Biotar 2/5,8cm, 2/58, 1.5/75
Carl Zeiss: Distagon 2/28 T*, 1.4/35 T*, Ultron 1.8/50, Tessar 2.8/50, Planar 1.4/50 T* MM, 1.7/50 T* MM, 1.4/85 T* AEG, Sonnar 2.8/135 T*
Asahi Optical Co.: Super-Multi-Coated Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 2.8/120, 2.5/135 I & II, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4/300, 5.6/400, 4/45-125, 4.5/85-210, Super-Takumar 4.5/20, 3.5/24, 3.5/28, 2/35, 3.5/35, 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 4/150, 4/200, 4.5/70-150, Fish-Eye-Takumar 4/17, Macro-Takumar 4/50, Super-Macro Takumar 4/50, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-Takumar 4/50, 4/100, Bellows-Takumar 4/100, Asahi-Kogaku Takumar 3.5/50, 2.4/58, 3.5/100, Asahi-Kogaku Tele-Takumar 3.5/135, Auto-Takumar 2.3/35, 3.5/35, 1.8/55, 1.8/55 (Zebra), 2/55, 2.2/55, 1.8/85, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, Takumar 4/35, 2.2/55, 2/58, 2.8/105, 3.5/135, 3.5/200, 5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 5.6/200, 6.3/300, SMC Takumar 1.4/50, 1.8/55, 2/55, SMC-M 1.4/50, 1.7/50, 2/50
Tomioka: Tominon 2/5cm, Auto-Chinon 3.5/21, 1.4/55, Auto-Yashinon DS-M 1.2/55 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6603
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Definitely the Fujita 135/4.5, that I know of.
Its smaller than the Tamron, the Takumar, the Dollonds (who made that ? I have one branded "Palinar"), the Tokina 135/3.5, and all the various others I have.
I had a picture of it in a lineup with the Tamron and the Takumar, but it seems to have dropped off my Flickr.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
luisalegria
Joined: 07 Mar 2008
Posts: 6603
Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
Fujita 135/4.5 (Peerotar brand, the Fujita-branded ones are in a nicer black and chrome) -
I need to stick my comparison shot back on flickr.
_________________
I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007
Posts: 57853
Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
http://www.mflenses.com/gallery/v/german/isco_gottingen/tele_westanar_135mm/?
This is pretty small.
_________________
-------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
| martyn_bannister wrote: |
Is that a native M42 or an adapter? The example you show is M37. Is it smaller than the TAMRON TWIN-TELE (which also has an adapter)? Mine measures 68mm long to front of adapter, 48mm max diameter, weighing in at 208g. |
That's not my copy Mine has an M42 mount. |
Dimensions? Samples? You know the rules  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
blende8
Joined: 29 Sep 2007
Posts: 260
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
blende8 wrote:
Ok, the Fujita seems to be the smallest with respect to diameter.
But it seems from the images to be about 10 cm in length.
So, what then is the shortest 135mm?
_________________
Best wishes, Wieland
K-1, K-5IIs
Pentax, mysterium quod absconditum fuit ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor
Joined: 23 Oct 2010
Posts: 524
Location: WA, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
Laurentiu Cristofor wrote:
Jupiter 37A is also quite small: 100mm length, 58mm wide.
_________________
http://www.ipernity.com/home/2419272
https://laurphoto.blogspot.com/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski
Joined: 12 Jan 2009
Posts: 287
Location: Czech Republic
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bob van Sikorski wrote:
mine 37A has 85mm lenght (without screw), 58mm wide (withnout lens hood) and weights 368g (without lens hood and caps).
_________________
Rokkor (MD 45/2.0, MC PF 50/1.7), Porst Color Reflex MC Auto 55/1.2, Jupiter 135/3.5
Minolta X-700, Minolta Dynax 4, Flexaret IIa (later version), Flexaret VI
Voigtländer Avus 9x12 (1927-1935 version)
Epson V500 + VueScan/Linux + RawTherapee 4.x + GIMP/wavelett sharpen plugin
Meopta Magnifax III (up to 6x9) + Opemus III (up to 6x6), Rodenstock Rodagon 50/2.8, Meopta Anaret 105/4.5
Proud user of czech films! company homepage: foma.cz, buy here: fomafoto.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
crm-114
Joined: 14 Oct 2009
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:05 am Post subject: raynox |
|
|
crm-114 wrote:
my tele raynox 135/2.8 is 70mm long, front to mount, excluding screw, but more like 80mm front to back including all elements |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
That's it then. The TAMRON TWIN-TELE wins at 68mm in length - front of lens to front of adapter. Unless someone can find something shorter?
What is the maximum diameter of the Fujita? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
And the winner is...the Fujita! 
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
rawhead
Joined: 09 Feb 2009
Posts: 1525
Location: Boston, MA
Expire: 2014-04-29
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rawhead wrote:
The Tele-Astranar 135mm was pretty small (sold, so I don't know the dimensions) but that was a T-mount:
http://forum.mflenses.com/tele-astranar-135mm-f3-5-t15013,highlight,astranar.html
_________________
Sony α7R, Pentax 67II, Kiev-60, Hasselblad 203FE, 903SWC, Graflex Norita 66, Mamiya M645 1000s, Burke & James 8x10, Graflex Pacemaker Speed Graphic (4x5 and 3x4), Century Graphic (2x3), R.B. Graflex Seried D, Rolleiflex SL66E, Rolleiflex 2.8C Xenotar, Mamiya C330f, a few M42, six P6, three OM, four Hasselblad, two Pentax 67, two Mamiya 645, one Noritar, and a sprinkle of EF. Oh, and an Aero Ektar and Leica Noctilux |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4711
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
Damn, fujita is on my watchlist
Tamron Twin-Tele 135mm f4.5 vs Spiratone 135mm f1.8 size comparison 
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Nordentro
Joined: 24 Jun 2010
Posts: 4711
Location: Lillehammer, Norway
Expire: 2015-01-29
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nordentro wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
| And the winner is...the Fujita! |
I think mine Tarmon is a bit shorter than yours. I don't have that border on the top of the lens But still, without the border the fujita is a bit smaller
_________________
Lars | Manuellfokus.no |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008
Posts: 6622
Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
| Nordentro wrote: |
Damn, fujita is on my watchlist
Tamron Twin-Tele 135mm f4.5 vs Spiratone 135mm f1.8 size comparison
|
_________________
Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DSG
Joined: 04 Mar 2007
Posts: 544
Location: London, UK.
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DSG wrote:
Thats small but its also very slow...Perhaps a better question would be:
"What is the smallest 135mm f2.8 lens?", as surely most people go for faster f2.8 versions.
My M42 Vivitar 135mm f2.8 is just 86mm long (including the screw) at the infinity setting (extending to 100mm long at its 5ft closest focus distance) and its 61mm in diameter with a 52mm filter thread. Its a pre-select version with two aperture dials about an inch back from the front.
It has a beautiful 15 blade iris, giving a virtually perfectly circular aperture and the best bit is I only had to pay £2 for it!!!
Last edited by DSG on Sat Nov 27, 2010 2:53 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martyn_bannister
Joined: 23 May 2010
Posts: 1151
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 10:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martyn_bannister wrote:
| ManualFocus-G wrote: |
And the winner is...the Fujita!
|
Looks like the Fujita takes it. Unless, of course, it's an optical illusion. Don't you have to wear vertical stripes to look taller, or is it horizontal stripes to look fatter? Oh, I can't remember now.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Lloydy
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 7771
Location: Ironbridge. UK.
Expire: 2022-01-01
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lloydy wrote:
Super Paragon 135 f2.8
88mm long at 1.5 Metre (full extension) from camera to front, 65mm dia'.
Maybe not the smallest, but still a compact lens.
_________________
LENSES & CAMERAS FOR SALE.....
I have loads of stuff that I have to get rid of, if you see me commenting about something I have got and you want one, ask me.
My Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/mudplugga/
My ipernity -
http://www.ipernity.com/home/294337 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
martinsmith99
Joined: 31 Aug 2008
Posts: 6943
Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2010 6:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I'm sure my Chinon could compete. I'll measure it later when I get home.
_________________
Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
