| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fuzilah
Joined: 14 Nov 2010 Posts: 3 Location: E.U.
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: SMC Takumar 50mm 1.4 on 5DmkII or 60D (mirror question) |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: SMC Takumar 50mm 1.4 on 5DmkII or 60D (mirror question) |
|
|
Fuzilah wrote:
Hi, it is my first post, sorry if I couldn't find the answer and this has been answered.
I was on to buy the new D7000, then I found that nikons can't have infinity focus on M42 adapters unless they have a crappy glass element on the adapter... that turned me to canon. Since the 5DmkII is FF and it is still an amazing camera with amazing video capabilities, I started to look at buying one (paying a bit more for some superior camera seemed fair)
I was about to buy a 5DmkII until I found out about this problem with the mirror getting stuck on infinity focus on some takumar lenses, specially on the SMC 50mm 1.4... Since I am going to use mainly MF lenses, and the tak is one of my favorites (if not my favorite lens), this is a problem that concerns me before spending a lot of money on a new camera.
I've been diggin the web for the past 2 weeks trying to get a definitive conclusion on the subject, and so far there is none. The question is: Is there any M42 to EOS adapter that will keep the infinity focus (1,5mm thickness) AND not have a mirror problem with some takumars?
I do not care for focus chips, I don't mind to be fully MF. Some people claim that tagotech's adapter (http://cgi.ebay.com/M42-lens-Canon-EOS-body-Adapter-/230545838899?pt=Lens_Accessories&hash=item35ad9a5333#ht_2071wt_1112) will do the job, others still say you have to submit your canon to "surgery" ( =S spending 2 grand and risking the new camera seems... crazy)... what is your opinion on this subject?
Does the 60D suffer from the same mirror contact problem? Or Am I safe with a 60D (inferior camera than 5DmkII but still good video capabilities) and M42 adater with takumar lenses?
thank you for your attention, I hope this is a valid thread!
best regards,
fuz |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99
 Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 7015 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I have the S-M-C Tak (not SMC) 50 1.4. Depending on the adapter it MAY hit the mirror. This can happen if the adapter is too thin and allows focus beyond infinity.
The options are buy a thicker adapter, or as I did, add a few strands of sellotape neatly until the mirror doesn't catch and infinity is still possible. Took me all of 5 minutes to do this.
The 24mm Tak will always hit though. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99
 Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 7015 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
Oh, and welcome to the forum. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 11674 Location: California
Expire: 2027-07-11
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 8:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Welcome Fuzilah!
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
I have the S-M-C Tak (not SMC) 50 1.4. Depending on the adapter it MAY hit the mirror. This can happen if the adapter is too thin and allows focus beyond infinity.
The options are buy a thicker adapter, or as I did, add a few strands of sellotape neatly until the mirror doesn't catch and infinity is still possible. Took me all of 5 minutes to do this.
The 24mm Tak will always hit though. |
+1
Although please consider how often you actually focus the 1.4/50 at infinity. The 5D mirror hits only when the lens is focused at infinity or very very slightly before. For example that lens has been on my 5D for the past two weeks -- hundreds of photos later, I locked the mirror only once, the image was fine. I don't use the 1.4/50 at infinity very often!
No mirror issues with crop-sensor cams such as 60D.
That the 24 gets hit is a major tragedy imho!!! That lens on crop-sensor is amazing. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony ILCE-7RM2, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
Lenses:
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200, Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300, Macro-Takumar 1:4/50, Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm, Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element), Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17, Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:3.5/28, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4/300, 1:4.5/500, Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100, Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100, SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
M42 Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
Contax Carl Zeiss Vario-Sonnar T* 28-70mm F3.5-4.5
Pentax K-mount SMC PENTAX-A ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Solinon 1:5.6/18 ASPH.
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (151B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH)
Vivitar 100mm 1:2.8 MC 1:1 Macro Telephoto (Kiron)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fuzilah
Joined: 14 Nov 2010 Posts: 3 Location: E.U.
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fuzilah wrote:
Thank you both for fast and enlightening replies! Been following the forum for a long time, but only as a reader. =)
martinsmith99:
As for the tape trick, are you putting tape under the adapter (between body and adapter)? Just trial and error until having it right?
Am I right to assume that the best thickness is 1,5mm? (to put M42 lenses at the same distance to the sensor as original canon glass) If so, is it enough for the mirror not to hit it? Do you know of any adapter wich is a sure shot?
(sorry about having so much questions, just trying to go to the bottom of the question I'm asking for the last 2 weeks)
visualopsins:
so the 60D doesn't have any issues with the mirror because of its smaller sensor, just what I thought. Thanks! (still a possibility this camera).
I guess you mean that the 24 can also be used without a problem on a 60D (or a 7D for that matter) without any problems? If so, that is great news indeed! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Himself
 Joined: 01 Mar 2007 Posts: 3315 Location: Montreal
Expire: 2013-05-30
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2010 9:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Himself wrote:
| martinsmith99 wrote: |
few strands of sellotape |
Martin, what tape is that?
A link or something would be great.
Edit: I found it. _________________ Moderator Himself |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TBaker
 Joined: 02 Dec 2009 Posts: 344 Location: Canada
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
TBaker wrote:
I have both the 5D MKII and the SMC 50 1.4. I find I can shoot at infinity if focused but if I bring the lense to the infinity stop the mirror will hit. But really I rarely shoot needing infinity with this lense.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Fuzilah
Joined: 14 Nov 2010 Posts: 3 Location: E.U.
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fuzilah wrote:
Sure looks fine with that lens in it TBaker! =)
In the end, I guess it all comes down to using it or not at infinity focus.
Is there a list with the M42 lenses with the "mirror hit" problem? Which takumars have that problem? Is there any other brand with that problem? (zenith, helios, pentax A*, carl zeiss, etc) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
my_photography
 Joined: 03 Nov 2008 Posts: 2772 Location: Pearl of the Orient
Expire: 2016-12-25
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
my_photography wrote:
| Fuzilah wrote: |
Is there a list with the M42 lenses with the "mirror hit" problem? Which takumars have that problem? Is there any other brand with that problem? (zenith, helios, pentax A*, carl zeiss, etc) |
Yes, there is indeed one such list in the forum. You can refer to 5D MkII Lens Compatibility Chart _________________
Zeiss: CJZ Flektogon 20/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 20/4, , CJZ Pentacon 29/2.8, CJZ Flektogon 35/2.4, CJZ Pancolar 50/1.8, Tessar 50/2.8, Biotar 7.5cm/1.5, CJZ Pancolar 80/1.8, CJZ Sonnar 135/3.5, CJZ Pentacon 135/2.8 CJZ Sonnar 200/2.8
Other Germany: Meyer Primoplan 50/1.8, Meyer Trioplan 100/2.8
Takumar: SMC 50/1.4 Super Tak 55/2, Super Tak 85/1.9, S-M-C 135/3.5, Super Tak 150/4
Russian: Zenith 16/2.8, Mir-24M 2/35, Volna-9 50/2.8, Helios 44M (58/2), Helios 44M-3 MC (58/2), Helios 40 (85/1.5), Tair 11A (135/2.8 )
Others: Sears 28/2.8, Sankor 35/2.8, Enna M�nchen Tele-Ennalyt 135/3.5
Zoom Sigma Zoom 28-85/3.5-4.5
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
martinsmith99
 Joined: 31 Aug 2008 Posts: 7015 Location: S Glos, UK
Expire: 2013-11-18
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 15, 2010 7:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
martinsmith99 wrote:
I put the tape between the adapter and the lens. The problem I have found is that most M42 > EOS adapters are too thin, so setting the lens at infinity is actually quite a bit beyond infinity.
When my Tak is set to infinity now, it is really infinity and clears the mirror. And I do often use it for lansdcapes so it gets a lot of use at infinity. _________________ Casual attendance these days |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|