View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Badr12
 Joined: 06 Apr 2014 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 8:01 pm Post subject: How do you organise your collection? |
|
|
Badr12 wrote:
I have got a huge collection of lenses (200-300)and tried different ways to organise the in a way that they
are also easily accessible
For those in similar situations (sure there are a lot here) how do you do it
Focal lengths
Primes, zooms
Make
Expensive, cheapos
Most used
Most loved
AF, manual
Or
Randomly (my default way I keep coming back to it)
Thanks in advance
Badr |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tb_a
 Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3659 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
Not at all!
I took the chaotic approach hence I'm not even able to tell the exact size of my collection. I even bought a specific lens a second time because I didn't remember that I had it already.
However, I don't recommend to do it likewise.  _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
BurstMox
 Joined: 04 Dec 2011 Posts: 1985 Location: France
Expire: 2016-08-02
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BurstMox wrote:
I mostly organise them regarding to their initial use :
-Projection lenses
-Video lenses (TV and cine)
-Technical
-Aerial
-Photographic (organised by factory, and there is a special place for big lenses). _________________ Pierre
sovietlenses.fr
Soviet lenses Facebook group |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 5940 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
Well, mine are mostly grouped by lens mount which usually means by manufacturer eg Nikon F, Pentax K etc.
The M42's and Exaktas are a mix of course
Tom
Last edited by Oldhand on Sat Mar 31, 2018 9:55 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Pete
 Joined: 01 Feb 2011 Posts: 240 Location: Denver, San Jose
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Pete wrote:
I don't have a huge collection but...
I keep my Nikon pre-AI lenses together, usually on display. All have factory AI kits and I use them regularly.
My common use lens kit is in my camera bags and I have a big bag for my AF lenses.
Macro lenses, Bellows and special lenses that I put on the bellows are together.
Fortunately my press lenses are on Speed Graphic or Polaroid cameras and stay together.
I have a few anamorphic lenses that I keep together with their partner lenses.
I have a spread sheet with most stuff listed but admit I am not good at keeping it up.
Pete _________________ "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly!!!"
www.pete.3rdtrick.com |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sjak
 Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
Oldhand wrote: |
Well, mine are mostly grouped by lens mount |
that's also my approach; besides I keep track of my stuff in a spreadsheet with the specs serial #, interesting links etc about the lenses |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 9848 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2018 10:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Manufacturer
Because I collected specific manufacturers.
Asahi Takumars
Nikkors
Tamron SP
Soligors
Other
Physically lenses are stored 0 on camera, 1 for frequent use, 2 lenses fresh from field going into storage, 3 storage.
Edit: Before lba insanities were cured, I'd begun collecting Vivitars, Topcon, Sun, Hoya, Spiratone. And constant aperture cheap zooms. Before that everything was prime.
Last edited by visualopsins on Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:06 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 3:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
I have several 5x5 Expedit units with lenses arranged primarily by mount. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
leemik
 Joined: 21 Feb 2011 Posts: 107 Location: Quincy, MA
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
leemik wrote:
My collection is about the same size as yours..
My huge modern AF and telephoto lenses I put into 2 large Pelican cases.. or some have their own case
The vintage MF lenses I store by focal range.. 50mm & up and vintage zooms I noticed are on average bigger and heavier than wide angles.. They get stored in a wood cabinet with glass doors so I can see them.. The 49mm and wider focal lengths get stored in a glass and metal cabinet with a door.
All my lighting gear, tripods, grips, boom, rigging, bags, backgrounds, etc,... are stored on one of those baker's shelves.
My camera bodies are all lined up on my workbench right now as I haven't figured out what to do with them yet...luckily I only have a few (9) as I have mostly been collecting lenses.
My cleaning supplies and spare parts get organized in an Ikea doll house on my workbench.. it works rather well!
My lens and camera tools, adapters, spare hoods get stored in an ikea filing cabinet under my workbench
I record everything meticulously in an online database so I know what I have on hand and don't buy it again.
I stopped buying for a while because I'm very low on space and I promised the GF I would not use another cabinet and that seemed to slow down my GAS a lot..
--mike |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
kansalliskalaCafe
 Joined: 23 Jul 2015 Posts: 602 Location: South Finland, countryside
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 6:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
kansalliskalaCafe wrote:
I don't actually collect lenses, I just have old and new cameras all over the house and sometimes I search for something for days and find stuff I didn't even remember having at all. _________________ (my normal account password still on another computer) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
tb_a
 Joined: 26 Jan 2010 Posts: 3659 Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 9:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
kansalliskalaCafe wrote: |
I just have old and new cameras all over the house and sometimes I search for something for days and find stuff I didn't even remember having at all. |
Sounds very familiar to me.  _________________ Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lightshow
 Joined: 04 Nov 2011 Posts: 3668 Location: Calgary
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Lightshow wrote:
Mine are grouped by mount so I can choose a mount and grab the adapter and lenses easily.
I also have a most used area where I put lenses I always prefer to take shooting. _________________ A Manual Focus Junky...
One photographers junk lens is an artists favorite tool.
My lens list
http://www.flickr.com/photos/lightshow-photography/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
cooltouch
 Joined: 15 Jan 2009 Posts: 9107 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cooltouch wrote:
First off, I don't really separate my lenses from my camera bodies. I have a rather large cabinet that has five shelves. The top three shelves are reserved for my most popular 35mm and digital cameras, and their lenses. So, take any one of them as an example, I have the cameras aligned on the left, and the lenses on the right. The cameras are arranged by size, tallest in back (usually motor driven cameras are the tallest), shortest in front. With the lenses, I set them on end -- tallest in back, shortest in front. If I'm feeling particularly anal I might sort them by focal length and zoom range.
The lower two shelves are reserved for my medium format gear and rangefinder cameras and lenses. On the upper of these two shelves, I have my Pentax 67 camera and lenses and my Bronica ETRSi with accessories and lenses. On the lower shelf is all my rangefinder gear. Which include my Canon LTM cameras and lenses and my 35mm and medium format rangefinders.
I'm running out of room. Some of the overflow is cluttering up a bookcase that I really need for books. So I may be looking for more space scattered throughout my man cave. _________________ Michael
My Gear List: http://michaelmcbroom.com/photo/gear.html
My Gallery: http://michaelmcbroom.com/gallery3/index.php/
My Flickr Page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/11308754@N08/albums
My Music: https://soundcloud.com/michaelmcbroom/albums
My Blog: http://michaelmcbroom.com/blogistan/ |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
stevemark
 Joined: 29 Apr 2011 Posts: 2979 Location: Switzerland
|
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2018 5:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
1) Manufacturers/systems (eg Canon FD, Minolta SR, Konica AR, Carl Zeiss CY, Nikkor, etc.)
2) Generations within one manufacturer (e. g. Canon "breech lock" and "new FD" or "Minolta Auto Rokkors", "MC-I", "MC-II", "MC-X", "MD-I/-II", and "MD-III")
Stephan _________________ www.artaphot.ch |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
l9magen
 Joined: 13 Jul 2011 Posts: 326 Location: Calgary, Canada
Expire: 2016-10-21
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
l9magen wrote:
Lighthouse wrote:
Quote: |
Mine are grouped by mount so I can choose a mount and grab the adapter and lenses easily.
I also have a most used area where I put lenses I always prefer to take shooting. |
Obviously everyone in Calgary organizes the same way!!
i also have a spreadsheet so I can keep track of things, and more importantly, which sums up what it all cost: that is enough to scare me from spending more until I sell the least used. I recently pared down the collection from over a 100 lenses to under 50 now, spread over 3 digital cameras and 2 film (4 mounts in all, one of which is specific to two lenses, Mamiya 6). So I think it's a relatively small and versatile collection.
That said I'm about to "free up more space" as I'm looking at a new digital body. _________________ Lochlann
Digital Camera: Leica MM246 & M10
RF lenses: Zeiss ZM, assorted Japanese LTMs & Nikkor-S |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Sjak
 Joined: 29 Sep 2017 Posts: 696
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sjak wrote:
One thing with the spreadsheet, is that I am much more focused to stay within a only few main lens mounts (for me Exakta, M42, LM/LTM) with few exceptions. It makes it easier to resist the temptation of all those lenses screaming to be bought  |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luisalegria
 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
The last time I was sorting my things I was separating them by smell, but I quickly gave up. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Oldhand
 Joined: 01 Apr 2013 Posts: 5940 Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 11:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
luisalegria wrote: |
The last time I was sorting my things I was separating them by smell, but I quickly gave up. |
Yes - I have some Russian cameras whose leather cases can be classified that way
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 9848 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Mon Apr 02, 2018 11:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
Luis' post reminds me of the corollary question:
How much have you spent?
I go first here. Low 5 figures in US$ first few years of collecting.  _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200
Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300
Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm
Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element),
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4.5/500
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100
Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
Other lenses:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gardener
 Joined: 22 Sep 2013 Posts: 950 Location: USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Gardener wrote:
My spreadsheet tells me that since I've started collecting I've spent just under $100k on lenses (or just over, if you count in Canon AF gear). However, this number does not mean much as I no longer own a significant portion of those lenses. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luisalegria
 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
In total, net of sales, I think I have spent $500/year on photography over the last decade.
I don't think my collection is worth much as I sell most of the valuable pieces. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
luisalegria
 Joined: 07 Mar 2008 Posts: 6627 Location: San Francisco, USA
Expire: 2018-01-18
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 12:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
luisalegria wrote:
In total, net of sales, I think I have spent $500/year on photography over the last decade.
I don't think my collection is worth much as I sell most of the valuable pieces. _________________ I like Pentax DSLR's, Exaktas, M42 bodies of all kinds, strange and cheap Japanese lenses, and am dabbling in medium format/Speed Graphic work. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
GrahamR
 Joined: 01 Feb 2018 Posts: 54
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 1:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
GrahamR wrote:
I'm pretty new to the photography scene..started in november last year.
Fortunately i found this site and just read an researched as much as i can..between you guys and gals on this site/forum and that angry photographer dude i've learned a ton in a very small amount of time.
Pretty much bypassed a lot of messing around and mainly because of the extortionate prices of modern lenses and the unique and amazing character of vintage/legacy glass,i was able to learn the right way,and very quickly.
I started realizing it was a rabbit hole so i decided on one main brand which was "konica" and set out to get the basics.
Ended up getting the 28,35,40,50,1.7 50,1.4,57 and 135mm.
Once i got that out of the way,i just grabbed the most popular russian (jupiter,mir,helios,industar) and a couple german (zeiss,voigt,Meyer optik gorlitz,rollei?).
So now i only try out the classics and replace as i go.
Separated and stored in one clear container,into Japanese,Russians and Germans.Only after focal lengths i don't have now.
Price-wise i don't even think i've spent 1K on lenses yet.
Been blessed to get sweet deals, example my profile pic the Voigtlander Vitoret i got in excellent condition with manuals, lens hood,and case etc for less than $2. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
visualopsins
 Joined: 05 Mar 2009 Posts: 9848 Location: California
Expire: 2021-06-22
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 4:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
visualopsins wrote:
I resold almost everything too. I didn't run a comparison of purchases to sales. I'm pretty sure I spentI much more than I received from sales. I tell myself that's how much my "education" cost. I think money well spent then.
Shipping costs were significant. Those don't get recovered when lens is sold. Pays more to be a shipper/distributor., almost. _________________ ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮ like attracts like! ☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮☮
Cameras: Sony A7Rii, Spotmatics II, F, and ESII, Nikon P4
M42 Asahi Optical Co., Lenses:
Takumar 1:4 f=35mm, 1:2 f=58mm (Sonnar), 1:2.4 f=58mm (Heliar), 1:2.2 f=55mm (Gaussian), 1:2.8 f=105mm (Model I), 1:2.8/105 (Model II), 1:5.6/200
Tele-Takumar 1:5.6/200, 1:6.3/300
Auto-Takumar 1:2.3 f=35, 1:1.8 f=55mm, 1:2.2 f=55mm
Super-TAKUMAR 1:3.5/28 (fat), 1:2/35 (Fat), 1:1.4/50 (8-element),
Super-Multi-Coated Fisheye-TAKUMAR 1:4/17
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR 1:4.5/20, 1:3.5/24, 1:2/35, 1:3.5/35, 1:1.8/85, 1:1.9/85 1:2.8/105, 1:3.5/135, 1:2.5/135 (II), 1:4/150, 1:4/200, 1:4.5/500
Super-Multi-Coated Macro-TAKUMAR 1:4/50, 1:4/100
Super-Multi-Coated Bellows-TAKUMAR 1:4/100
SMC TAKUMAR 1:1.4/50, 1:1.8/55
Other lenses:
Carl Zeiss Jena Flektogon 2.4/35
SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:3.5 35~105mm, SMC PENTAX ZOOM 1:4 45~125mm
Nikon Micro-NIKKOR-P-C Auto 1:3.5 f=55mm, NIKKOR-P Auto 105mm f/2.5 Pre-AI (Sonnar), Micro-NIKKOR 105mm 1:4 AI, NIKKOR AI-S 35-135mm f/3,5-4,5
Tamron SP 17mm f/3.5 (51B), SP 500mm f/8 (55BB), SP 70-210mm f/3.5 (19AH) |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
LucisPictor
 Joined: 26 Feb 2007 Posts: 17666 Location: Oberhessen, Germany / Maidstone ('95-'96)
Expire: 2013-12-03
|
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2018 8:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
LucisPictor wrote:
I do own so much stuff that I need 7 different places/cabinets to store everything.
All the things are organized according to system:
Nikon/Nikkor
Sony and all lenses adapted to
Leica M & Fuji X
Olympus µ4/3 & Nikon1
Leica 4/3 and Leica compact
vintage cams (chrome era)
vintage cams (really old ones, mostly medium format)
and a fridge for my films _________________ Personal forum activity on pause every now and again (due to job obligations)!
Carsten, former Moderator
Things ON SALE
Carsten = "KAPCTEH" = "Karusutenu" | T-shirt?.........................My photos from Emilia: http://www.schouler.net/emilia/emilia2011.html
My gear: http://retrocameracs.wordpress.com/ausrustung/
Old list: http://forum.mflenses.com/viewtopic.php?t=65 (Not up-to-date, sorry!) | http://www.lucispictor.de | http://www.alensaweek.wordpress.com |
http://www.retrocamera.de |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|