| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
 Posted: Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
itsfozzy wrote:
| Olinask wrote: |
Simon, another great episode. Haven't quite caught up yet, but skipped ahead to listen to this latest.
Agree with you completely regarding the Konica AR 57. Was going to sell off my copy as it can't be focal reduced for micro four thirds, but can't bear to let it go as it's such an outstanding lens. The micro four thirds crop results in a 114 degree full frame angle of view that is perfect for portraiture.
If ever driven to sell it, doubt I'd find another at any reasonable price. The Konica 57 1.2 is not at all common and seems to be going for as much as $1000 these days.
Have you scheduled the cinema episode yet? |
I can't bring myself to sell the Konica, it's just too sweet!
We should get the cine episode pencilled in for a date soon.
_________________
https://simonforsterphotographic.co.uk/
The Classic Lenses Podcast https://www.classiclensespodcast.com/
My eBay Shop http://stores.ebay.co.uk/itsfozzy-Photography
Large Format Photography Podcast
https://largeformatphotographypodcast.podbean.com/
My Flickr Albums (more than 150 lens sample shots) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125323761@N07/albums
https://www.facebook.com/SimonForsterPhotographic/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiclenses/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Olinask
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olinask wrote:
[quote="itsfozzy"][quote="Olinask"]
| itsfozzy wrote: |
I can't bring myself to sell the Konica, it's just too sweet!
We should get the cine episode pencilled in for a date soon. |
Does your Konica have the yellow tint? Mine did, but as you likely know shining an Ikea JANSJÖ light into it for a few days will clear out the thorium browning. Tend to use a pair, one shining in each end. Takumars take only a few days, but Fujinons can take a week or more. https://www.ikea.com/gb/en/products/lighting/work-lamps/jansj%C3%B6-led-work-lamp-yellow-art-30400011/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2018 8:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
I have just listened to the podcast.
I use the 58/1.2 Revuenon for portraits on APSC.
I love it.
There were comments relating to how difficult it is to focus at f1.2
Here are some images of friends of mine taken in a busy cafe setting - all at f1.2
Tom
#1
#2
#3
#4
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2018 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
Talking about the very fast vintage MF lenses, i just got an offer to test the FD 1.2/55mm ASPH. Along with a few other f1.2 lenses i already have (Canon FL 1.2/58mm, FD 1.2/55mm and nFD 1.2/50mm L, Minolta MC-II, MC-X 1.2/58mm, and MD-III 1.2/50mm, as well as Nikkor Ai 1.2/55mm), we might run a test at infinity, and a portrait session.
Any suggestions as how to run the test in a meaningful way?
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
tb_a
Joined: 26 Jan 2010
Posts: 3678
Location: Austria
Expire: 2019-08-28
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2018 10:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
tb_a wrote:
| stevemark wrote: |
Talking about the very fast vintage MF lenses, i just got an offer to test the FD 1.2/55mm ASPH. Along with a few other f1.2 lenses i already have (Canon FL 1.2/58mm, FD 1.2/55mm and nFD 1.2/50mm L, Minolta MC-II, MC-X 1.2/58mm, and MD-III 1.2/50mm, as well as Nikkor Ai 1.2/55mm), we might run a test at infinity, and a portrait session.
Any suggestions as how to run the test in a meaningful way?
Stephan |
Do you see any chance to include a SMC Pentax 50mm F1.2? At least according ColorFoto in the early 1980's it was best of the bunch wide open. I would provide my copy if there wouldn't be the customs problem with Switzerland....
As for the testing scenery: I would rather choose a non-human target with artificial light for the "portrait session" to grant identical circumstances. I did my last similar comparison indoors with a bunch of flowers and indirect flash light.
Cheers,
_________________
Thomas Bernardy
Manual focus lenses mainly from Minolta, Pentax, Voigtlaender, Leitz, Topcon and from Russia (too many to be listed here). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
stevemark
Joined: 29 Apr 2011
Posts: 3754
Location: Switzerland
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 28, 2018 7:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
stevemark wrote:
| tb_a wrote: |
Do you see any chance to include a SMC Pentax 50mm F1.2? At least according ColorFoto in the early 1980's it was best of the bunch wide open. I would provide my copy if there wouldn't be the customs problem with Switzerland....
As for the testing scenery: I would rather choose a non-human target with artificial light for the "portrait session" to grant identical circumstances. I did my last similar comparison indoors with a bunch of flowers and indirect flash light.
Cheers, |
I have never seen a Pentax 1.2/50mm ... let alone owned one. It might be easier if you compare your lens with one of our bunch. That should give a fairly good idea about possible differences.
On the other hand i don't really trust in old lens tests made on film. There were too many difficulties such as focusing correctly and the (missing) flatness of the film. And I don't expect dramatic differences between f1.2 lenses from the same generation. Preliminary tests of the Minolta MD-III 1.2/50mm and the Canon 1.2/50mm L at f1.2 did not reveal much difference. Maybe that's why Minolta never put their aspherical 1.2/50mm prototypes into production?
Stephan
_________________
www.artaphot.ch |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
itsfozzy wrote:
I don't know how I missed the comment above, but Johnny goes through them in this week's episode, so thank you all for your contributions.
With regard to making meaningful comparisons, I understand the hesitation, especially if portraits are involved. I did something similar last year and used one of my boys on a rare patient day and the camera on a tripod. I was very lucky with the light as it was consistent and my boy held a pretty consistent direct pose throughout. The reason I feel that I feel it's important to use a model is because skin tones could be quite different from one lens to the next, and as I mentioned in the podcast, the Nikkor Ai 55/1.2 turned my boy green compared to the others!
_________________
https://simonforsterphotographic.co.uk/
The Classic Lenses Podcast https://www.classiclensespodcast.com/
My eBay Shop http://stores.ebay.co.uk/itsfozzy-Photography
Large Format Photography Podcast
https://largeformatphotographypodcast.podbean.com/
My Flickr Albums (more than 150 lens sample shots) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125323761@N07/albums
https://www.facebook.com/SimonForsterPhotographic/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiclenses/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olinask
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Olinask wrote:
| itsfozzy wrote: |
I don't know how I missed the comment above, but Johnny goes through them in this week's episode, so thank you all for your contributions.
With regard to making meaningful comparisons, I understand the hesitation, especially if portraits are involved. I did something similar last year and used one of my boys on a rare patient day and the camera on a tripod. I was very lucky with the light as it was consistent and my boy held a pretty consistent direct pose throughout. The reason I feel that I feel it's important to use a model is because skin tones could be quite different from one lens to the next, and as I mentioned in the podcast, the Nikkor Ai 55/1.2 turned my boy green compared to the others! |
Hi Simon
Have finally binged the entire series. The favorites were episodes 12 with Geza, episode 17 on Soviet optical history, and episode 24 with Anil.
And like many others, find myself pausing while driving down the road to take notes at the next traffic light. Great information throughout.
Have you considered moving the discussion from Facebook to your own message board platform? Facebook doesn't allow those using their platform to easily monetize. And once you hit a few thousand listeners, you may want to consider running your own web show. Selling advertisements, picking up the Amazon and Ebay referral money, all the usual monetization schemes.
Know some who do this and only pick up beer money, but others that earn enough to make a full time occupation out of it. Given the amount of gear your listeners likely buy, even that few % of retailer referral money could add up quickly. It would probably also help in landing advertisers for the podcast.
Overall recommendations.
- Perhaps devote at least 10 minutes at the beginning or end of each episode to discuss classic lenses. Even if it's a pre-recorded segment. The personal interviews are often tremendously interesting, but sometimes don't focus highly on the podcast's namesake.
- An episode (or ten) with experts who specialize in lens cleaning and repair would be greatly helpful. Perhaps you could take questions in advance? To say that documentation and repair guides for most classic lenses are lacking would be a severe understatement.
- Audio issues of the type suffered in episode 1 are all too common for those starting into the podcast world. A number of podcasts with similar issues have either produced a new introductory episode or added a short intro to the first episode, explaining the audio issues and how they're solved in future episodes.
- On a personal note, while the discussions of film photography are interesting and "almost" have me ready to start shooting film again  , would like perhaps a bit more focus on the lenses.
Thanks for all the great work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 11:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
itsfozzy wrote:
| Olinask wrote: |
| itsfozzy wrote: |
I don't know how I missed the comment above, but Johnny goes through them in this week's episode, so thank you all for your contributions.
With regard to making meaningful comparisons, I understand the hesitation, especially if portraits are involved. I did something similar last year and used one of my boys on a rare patient day and the camera on a tripod. I was very lucky with the light as it was consistent and my boy held a pretty consistent direct pose throughout. The reason I feel that I feel it's important to use a model is because skin tones could be quite different from one lens to the next, and as I mentioned in the podcast, the Nikkor Ai 55/1.2 turned my boy green compared to the others! |
Hi Simon
Have finally binged the entire series. The favorites were episodes 12 with Geza, episode 17 on Soviet optical history, and episode 24 with Anil.
And like many others, find myself pausing while driving down the road to take notes at the next traffic light. Great information throughout.
Have you considered moving the discussion from Facebook to your own message board platform? Facebook doesn't allow those using their platform to easily monetize. And once you hit a few thousand listeners, you may want to consider running your own web show. Selling advertisements, picking up the Amazon and Ebay referral money, all the usual monetization schemes.
Know some who do this and only pick up beer money, but others that earn enough to make a full time occupation out of it. Given the amount of gear your listeners likely buy, even that few % of retailer referral money could add up quickly. It would probably also help in landing advertisers for the podcast.
Overall recommendations.
- Perhaps devote at least 10 minutes at the beginning or end of each episode to discuss classic lenses. Even if it's a pre-recorded segment. The personal interviews are often tremendously interesting, but sometimes don't focus highly on the podcast's namesake.
- An episode (or ten) with experts who specialize in lens cleaning and repair would be greatly helpful. Perhaps you could take questions in advance? To say that documentation and repair guides for most classic lenses are lacking would be a severe understatement.
- Audio issues of the type suffered in episode 1 are all too common for those starting into the podcast world. A number of podcasts with similar issues have either produced a new introductory episode or added a short intro to the first episode, explaining the audio issues and how they're solved in future episodes.
- On a personal note, while the discussions of film photography are interesting and "almost" have me ready to start shooting film again , would like perhaps a bit more focus on the lenses.
Thanks for all the great work. |
First things first, thank you and drive safely!
We are a little reluctant to move away from Facebook, as that's where it all started and it's the home of the core of our listeners. The existence of this thread is testament to the fact that many (possibly most) potential listeners are not on Facebook and have no intention of joining. You're absolutely right about the potential future growth of the podcast and it's something Johnny, Karl and I have discussed, and to that end we own a suitable web address. We are already well past the threshold for download numbers to be viable for advertising etc, and it would be nice to get my hosting fees covered as well as some recompense for the time that the three of us devote each week to making each episode. Having said that, we want to do things in the right way (whatever that is) so we are not going to rush into things.
Moving on to your specific recommendations;
As you might imaging, balancing the content of an episode can be very tricky especially if we have a particularly engaging guest and the conversation moves away from core function of the show. Interestingly, the three episodes you enjoyed most were actually quite light on specific lens talk, especially the show with Anil. Anil will return at a future date and he's promised to talk about his lenses next time!
Having a specific "lens talk" segment has merit, but it also has the potential to curtail the flow of an episode, which is in essence just 3 guys + the occasional guest talking nonsense about using old lenses. Committing to a lens talk segment may also create episodes that are even longer than they are already. We set out to produce a podcast that lasted for 45 minutes to and hour and it's a long time since we managed anything that short!
A lens repair episode has been on my wish list since day one, and it will happen one day. I asked my repair guy to come on the show but he said that he would spend the whole podcast berating so call camera repair experts that know "F**K ALL ABOUT REPAIRING F**CKING CAMERAS AND LENSES". I told him that he had the potential to be the perfect guest, but he just went off in a huff...
I thought I'd already put up a warning about the audio of Episode 1, I will go back and do this at some point.
Finally, film talk is a little contentious and I alluded to this a few episodes ago, and the overwhelming majority of responders to a question I posed suggested that the balance was fine. Interestingly, when we've had digital heavy episodes, we've had no complaints. Make of that what you will! The three hosts and especially Johnny are film shooters, so we're bound to talk film from time to time, and as long as we don't go overboard and talk too much about film cameras, then we're going to continue as we have done so far.
Thanks again for your constructive comments!
_________________
https://simonforsterphotographic.co.uk/
The Classic Lenses Podcast https://www.classiclensespodcast.com/
My eBay Shop http://stores.ebay.co.uk/itsfozzy-Photography
Large Format Photography Podcast
https://largeformatphotographypodcast.podbean.com/
My Flickr Albums (more than 150 lens sample shots) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125323761@N07/albums
https://www.facebook.com/SimonForsterPhotographic/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiclenses/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017
Posts: 1445
Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
Here are some images of friends of mine taken in a busy cafe setting - all at f1.2
Tom
|
Images? You do yourself an injustice Tom. They are great portraits to my eye. Superb characterisations. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 31, 2018 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| Sciolist wrote: |
| Oldhand wrote: |
Here are some images of friends of mine taken in a busy cafe setting - all at f1.2
Tom
|
Images? You do yourself an injustice Tom. They are great portraits to my eye. Superb characterisations. |
Thank you for your kind thoughts.
The "boys" are Terry, Charlie, Don and Garry.
We have coffee together every Wednesday.
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017
Posts: 1445
Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
Thank you for your kind thoughts.
The "boys" are Terry, Charlie, Don and Garry.
We have coffee together every Wednesday.
Tom |
You're welcome. Thanks for sharing the portraits . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
konicamera
Joined: 03 May 2009
Posts: 746
Location: Warsaw, Poland
Expire: 2014-06-14
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
konicamera wrote:
| Olinask wrote: |
| If ever driven to sell it, doubt I'd find another at any reasonable price. The Konica 57 1.2 is not at all common and seems to be going for as much as $1000 these days. |
Actually, they are quite frequent. In over 10 years of watching Hexanon auctions I don;t remember a time when there weren't at least 1 or 2 on Ebay at any given time. Often there are half a dozen. Their prices have come down slightly in the past couple of years, surprisingly enough. I remember them going for 500-700 for nice specimens and even beat up ones used to cost 300 and up. Today if you're willing to wait a bit, you can get a nice one for that price or slightly more.
There are 3 versions of this lens - with an aluminum ring (1967-1970); all black with metal focusing ring (1970-1973, looks a bit like the old Takumars) and all black with a rubber covered focusing ring (1973-1979). The first one with the amber/straw colored coatings is the one whose glass may yellow with time. The later ones with the blue/purple Color Dynamic Coating (CDC) don't do this.
More on the relative rarity of Hexanon lenses here: http://konicafiles.com/6-technical-questions/-how-rare-is-that-lens
_________________
L'homme s'ennuie du bien, cherche le mieux, trouve le mal, et s'y soummet, crainte du pire. - Duc François-Gaston de Lévis
While it is nice to be important, it's more important to be nice.
URL: www.konicafiles.com
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olinask
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olinask wrote:
| konicamera wrote: |
| Olinask wrote: |
| If ever driven to sell it, doubt I'd find another at any reasonable price. The Konica 57 1.2 is not at all common and seems to be going for as much as $1000 these days. |
Actually, they are quite frequent. In over 10 years of watching Hexanon auctions I don;t remember a time when there weren't at least 1 or 2 on Ebay at any given time. Often there are half a dozen. Their prices have come down slightly in the past couple of years, surprisingly enough. I remember them going for 500-700 for nice specimens and even beat up ones used to cost 300 and up. Today if you're willing to wait a bit, you can get a nice one for that price or slightly more.
There are 3 versions of this lens - with an aluminum ring (1967-1970); all black with metal focusing ring (1970-1973, looks a bit like the old Takumars) and all black with a rubber covered focusing ring (1973-1979). The first one with the amber/straw colored coatings is the one whose glass may yellow with time. The later ones with the blue/purple Color Dynamic Coating (CDC) don't do this.
More on the relative rarity of Hexanon lenses here: http://konicafiles.com/6-technical-questions/-how-rare-is-that-lens |
Thanks for the info.
Guess our definitions of "rare" aren't the same. Have to say, any lens that regularly has only 1 or 2 copies up for sale on the whole of the world's Ebay listings would seem to qualify as relatively rare.
Mine is the second version, looks a bit like a Takumar. It's definitely a radioactive thorium lens. Had to put it under the lights for a few days to clear the yellowing out. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
itsfozzy wrote:
| Olinask wrote: |
| konicamera wrote: |
| Olinask wrote: |
| If ever driven to sell it, doubt I'd find another at any reasonable price. The Konica 57 1.2 is not at all common and seems to be going for as much as $1000 these days. |
Actually, they are quite frequent. In over 10 years of watching Hexanon auctions I don;t remember a time when there weren't at least 1 or 2 on Ebay at any given time. Often there are half a dozen. Their prices have come down slightly in the past couple of years, surprisingly enough. I remember them going for 500-700 for nice specimens and even beat up ones used to cost 300 and up. Today if you're willing to wait a bit, you can get a nice one for that price or slightly more.
There are 3 versions of this lens - with an aluminum ring (1967-1970); all black with metal focusing ring (1970-1973, looks a bit like the old Takumars) and all black with a rubber covered focusing ring (1973-1979). The first one with the amber/straw colored coatings is the one whose glass may yellow with time. The later ones with the blue/purple Color Dynamic Coating (CDC) don't do this.
More on the relative rarity of Hexanon lenses here: http://konicafiles.com/6-technical-questions/-how-rare-is-that-lens |
Thanks for the info.
Guess our definitions of "rare" aren't the same. Have to say, any lens that regularly has only 1 or 2 copies up for sale on the whole of the world's Ebay listings would seem to qualify as relatively rare.
Mine is the second version, looks a bit like a Takumar. It's definitely a radioactive thorium lens. Had to put it under the lights for a few days to clear the yellowing out. |
Mine is the version 2 and it's a bit on the yellow side too, but not enough for me to do anything about it, in fact it's probably a reason I like the images it produces.
_________________
https://simonforsterphotographic.co.uk/
The Classic Lenses Podcast https://www.classiclensespodcast.com/
My eBay Shop http://stores.ebay.co.uk/itsfozzy-Photography
Large Format Photography Podcast
https://largeformatphotographypodcast.podbean.com/
My Flickr Albums (more than 150 lens sample shots) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125323761@N07/albums
https://www.facebook.com/SimonForsterPhotographic/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiclenses/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olinask
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2018 8:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olinask wrote:
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Olinask wrote: |
| konicamera wrote: |
| Olinask wrote: |
| If ever driven to sell it, doubt I'd find another at any reasonable price. The Konica 57 1.2 is not at all common and seems to be going for as much as $1000 these days. |
Actually, they are quite frequent. In over 10 years of watching Hexanon auctions I don;t remember a time when there weren't at least 1 or 2 on Ebay at any given time. Often there are half a dozen. Their prices have come down slightly in the past couple of years, surprisingly enough. I remember them going for 500-700 for nice specimens and even beat up ones used to cost 300 and up. Today if you're willing to wait a bit, you can get a nice one for that price or slightly more.
There are 3 versions of this lens - with an aluminum ring (1967-1970); all black with metal focusing ring (1970-1973, looks a bit like the old Takumars) and all black with a rubber covered focusing ring (1973-1979). The first one with the amber/straw colored coatings is the one whose glass may yellow with time. The later ones with the blue/purple Color Dynamic Coating (CDC) don't do this.
More on the relative rarity of Hexanon lenses here: http://konicafiles.com/6-technical-questions/-how-rare-is-that-lens |
Thanks for the info.
Guess our definitions of "rare" aren't the same. Have to say, any lens that regularly has only 1 or 2 copies up for sale on the whole of the world's Ebay listings would seem to qualify as relatively rare.
Mine is the second version, looks a bit like a Takumar. It's definitely a radioactive thorium lens. Had to put it under the lights for a few days to clear the yellowing out. |
Mine is the version 2 and it's a bit on the yellow side too, but not enough for me to do anything about it, in fact it's probably a reason I like the images it produces. |
Interestingly, my version 2 was both yellowed (thorium) and has a blue / purplish coating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Olinask
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 8:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Olinask wrote:
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Mine is the version 2 and it's a bit on the yellow side too, but not enough for me to do anything about it, in fact it's probably a reason I like the images it produces. |
No podcast this week? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 9:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
itsfozzy wrote:
| Olinask wrote: |
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Mine is the version 2 and it's a bit on the yellow side too, but not enough for me to do anything about it, in fact it's probably a reason I like the images it produces. |
No podcast this week? |
No, we're takg two week off, we will be back at the start of September.
Thank you for missing us!
_________________
https://simonforsterphotographic.co.uk/
The Classic Lenses Podcast https://www.classiclensespodcast.com/
My eBay Shop http://stores.ebay.co.uk/itsfozzy-Photography
Large Format Photography Podcast
https://largeformatphotographypodcast.podbean.com/
My Flickr Albums (more than 150 lens sample shots) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125323761@N07/albums
https://www.facebook.com/SimonForsterPhotographic/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiclenses/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oldhand
Joined: 01 Apr 2013
Posts: 6008
Location: Mid North Coast NSW - Australia
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2018 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oldhand wrote:
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Olinask wrote: |
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Mine is the version 2 and it's a bit on the yellow side too, but not enough for me to do anything about it, in fact it's probably a reason I like the images it produces. |
No podcast this week? |
No, we're takg two week off, we will be back at the start of September.
Thank you for missing us! |
Yes we are definitely missing you all
You do deserve a holiday from time to time Simon.
Thanks for all the podcasts so far
Tom |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
itsfozzy
Joined: 20 Oct 2014
Posts: 327
Location: Stoke-on-Trent UK
Expire: 2021-04-14
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 6:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
itsfozzy wrote:
| Oldhand wrote: |
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Olinask wrote: |
| itsfozzy wrote: |
| Mine is the version 2 and it's a bit on the yellow side too, but not enough for me to do anything about it, in fact it's probably a reason I like the images it produces. |
No podcast this week? |
No, we're takg two week off, we will be back at the start of September.
Thank you for missing us! |
Yes we are definitely missing you all
You do deserve a holiday from time to time Simon.
Thanks for all the podcasts so far
Tom |
Thank you Tom!
_________________
https://simonforsterphotographic.co.uk/
The Classic Lenses Podcast https://www.classiclensespodcast.com/
My eBay Shop http://stores.ebay.co.uk/itsfozzy-Photography
Large Format Photography Podcast
https://largeformatphotographypodcast.podbean.com/
My Flickr Albums (more than 150 lens sample shots) https://www.flickr.com/photos/125323761@N07/albums
https://www.facebook.com/SimonForsterPhotographic/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/classiclenses/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kds315*
Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 16541
Location: Weinheim, Germany
Expire: 2021-03-09
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
kds315* wrote:
Enjoy your vacation! 
_________________
Klaus - Admin
"S'il vient a point, me souviendra" [Thomas Bohier (1460-1523)]
http://www.macrolenses.de for macro and special lens info
http://www.pbase.com/kds315/uv_photos for UV Images and lens/filter info
https://www.flickr.com/photos/kds315/albums my albums using various lenses
http://photographyoftheinvisibleworld.blogspot.com/ my UV BLOG
http://www.travelmeetsfood.com/blog Food + Travel BLOG
https://galeriafotografia.com Architecture + Drone photography
Currently most FAV lens(es):
X80QF f3.2/80mm
Hypergon f11/26mm
ELCAN UV f5.6/52mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f4/60mm
Zeiss UV-Planar f2/62mm
Lomo Уфар-12 f2.5/41mm
Lomo Зуфар-2 f4.0/350mm
Lomo ZIKAR-1A f1.2/100mm
Nikon UV Nikkor f4.5/105mm
Zeiss UV-Sonnar f4.3/105mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f1.8/45mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f4.1/94mm
CERCO UV-VIS-NIR f2.8/100mm
Steinheil Quarzobjektiv f1.8/50mm
Pentax Quartz Takumar f3.5/85mm
Carl Zeiss Jena UV-Objektiv f4/60mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha II f1.1/90mm
NYE OPTICAL Lyman-Alpha I f2.8/200mm
COASTAL OPTICS f4/60mm UV-VIS-IR Apo
COASTAL OPTICS f4.5/105mm UV-Micro-Apo
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f4.5/85mm
Pentax Ultra-Achromatic Takumar f5.6/300mm
Rodenstock UV-Rodagon f5.6/60mm + 105mm + 150mm
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sciolist
Joined: 29 Mar 2017
Posts: 1445
Location: Scotland
Expire: 2021-04-16
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2018 9:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sciolist wrote:
Yep, I'm not going to begrudge a break. That's been quite a run of shows. Thanks. I'll keep my ear out on the 3rd. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
