View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 8:48 am Post subject: Trioplan N 100mm Auto Exakta Mount |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
Hi,
My first Exakta lens and it seemed that it would be the WORST version (Auto) to be adapted either to Canon Eos or NEX:
Any of you have this version???
Is there any Exakta-Eos adapter that fits Exaktas Auto versions?? And what about Nex adapter?
I have a Eos-Nex adapter so If there is a way to mount on Canon would be great, even if only for macro work (no infinity)!
Any guide would be appreciated.
Thanks
Vitor _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
Why you call it WORST?
I have experience with some exakta lenses. There's no different in adapting between auto and preset in Canon EOS & NEX ( I have both too)
In NEX I use Exa-EOS & EOS - NEX adapter
Problem in EOS only with the protuding part of your lens, which maybe hit Canon flash, but it still can be used by rotating lens so that that part not hit flash, but in NEX no problem.
If there's infinity problem in EOS, must be the adapter, someone report that he didn't get infinity.
I got my adapter from Big is (ebay), it get infinity for all my exakta lenses
oh btw, you better change title, its trioplan, not primoplan _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
I did change title, from Primoplan to Trioplan N.
You had bad conclusion this is not an M42 auto lens without a/m swithc where is adapter can be a problem.
This lens is perfectly usable with an Exakta adapter it has a ring marked with red dot close to top. With this ring to turn lens to manual mode like a/m switch on an M42 lens. Another hint with big silver arm at bottom if you press it with your finger blades will close. It has a benefit you can set sharpness at wide open and press it before release shutter to close blades.
This is a perfect lens don't worry you will love it. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
Perfect lens for Canon if you like the Trioplan rendering! You can use it like an aoutomatic lens by closing the aperture with a finger of your left hand before releasing the shutter.
Mounts very nicely on the Canon 5DII
Klaus _________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
I have the same lens and can try it when i get home to see how the EOS adapter works.
For Nex you should not have any problem at all but it is still better to get a dedicated Nex-Exakta adapter.
The stacking over EOS adapter is not good in my experience. _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
exaklaus
Joined: 11 Aug 2009 Posts: 1633 Location: Niederrhein, Germany
Expire: 2011-12-02
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 12:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
exaklaus wrote:
Not really the worst lens.
Following your attitude, I mounted it on my 5DII and made a few quick'n dirty shots in the garden. All f2,8, no postprocessing, except altering the size.
Klaus
_________________ my Ebay auctions
Canon 5D II,
Fuji GW690III, Fuji G617, Fujifilm X-E1
Bessaflex TM
Tachihara 4"x5"
Summilux-R 1:1,4/50
Canon FD 85mm 1:1,2
Color-Heliar 75mm F2.5 SL
www.autoselbstfotografie.de
www.classic-cameras-and-lenses.de |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
Hello. Thank you all..
Yes I meant TRIOPLAN!! I do not know how I wrote Primoplan and thinking Trioplan Thank you Atilla for the title change.
IAZA wrote: |
Why you call it WORST?
I got my adapter from Big is (ebay), it get infinity for all my exakta lenses
|
Well, I do not have ANY experience with Exakta lenses... At Captains Jack's website I found this Trioplan is the AUTO version, so when checking for EXAKTA-EOS adapters (in particular BIG_IS adapters) I noticed that he advertises that the adapter will NOT fit Auto exakta lenses.
Click here to see on Ebay
Can you please point me to the correct adapter for Canon 5D2?
Thanks _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
Last edited by vlousada on Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:03 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
Klaus,
Thank you for your quick test. Very nice images indeed. The Trioplan is well regarded but M42 versions are pretty expensive.
I had a chance to get an Exakta so I did not think twice and if I could have trouble to use on 5D2, at least it must fit on NEX.. Positively, you proved me wrong and I am looking forward to use my exakta lens on 5D2 as well
Great news!
Now just checking the correct tickness adapter for better use um full-frame eos.
Regards
Vitor _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
vlousada
Joined: 11 Dec 2010 Posts: 345 Location: Portugal
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
vlousada wrote:
std wrote: |
I have the same lens and can try it when i get home to see how the EOS adapter works.
For Nex you should not have any problem at all but it is still better to get a dedicated Nex-Exakta adapter.
The stacking over EOS adapter is not good in my experience. |
Thanks for your opinion.
I will check it after, but my primary use for the lens would be Canon over Nex. Will check how it works on Nex and then decide if worth a dedicated adapter. _________________ Regards,
VITOR
-------
SELLING:
Please ask
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
IAZA
Joined: 16 Apr 2010 Posts: 2587 Location: Indonesia
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
IAZA wrote:
well I use non AF chip adapter, and not Full frame canon.
I guess Klaus has correct adapter, he has all you have, same lens same cam, so same adapter right? _________________ nex5, Olympus EPM1, yashica half 14, Canon eos 650 want to see samples of mine? please click My lenses
and My gallery
~Suat~ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1
Joined: 18 Mar 2011 Posts: 15679
Expire: 2014-01-07
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
iangreenhalgh1 wrote:
I adapted a couple of Exakta lenses to EOS by simply glueing an M42-EOS adapter over the Exakta bayonet - it fits perfectly. One I converted is a Meyer Primotar 3.5/135 which has very similar rendering and bokeh to the more famous Trioplan.
_________________ I don't care who designed it, who made it or what country it comes from - I just enjoy using it! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ManualFocus-G
Joined: 29 Dec 2008 Posts: 6622 Location: United Kingdom
Expire: 2014-11-24
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ManualFocus-G wrote:
I found the Trioplan-N auto to be sharper than the famous preset model, and without the crazy bokeh. It worked fine on my EOS cameras with a standard adapter, but I sold it as I wanted more glow and crazy bokeh _________________ Graham - Moderator
Shooter of choice: Fujifilm X-T20 with M42, PB and C/Y lenses
See my Flickr photos at http://www.flickr.com/photos/manualfocus-g |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Attila
Joined: 24 Feb 2007 Posts: 57865 Location: Hungary
Expire: 2025-11-18
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Attila wrote:
ManualFocus-G wrote: |
I found the Trioplan-N auto to be sharper than the famous preset model, and without the crazy bokeh. It worked fine on my EOS cameras with a standard adapter, but I sold it as I wanted more glow and crazy bokeh |
+1 it looks like a good modern lens. _________________ -------------------------------
Items on sale on Ebay
Sony NEX-7 Carl Zeiss Planar 85mm f1.4, Minolta MD 35mm f1.8, Konica 135mm f2.5, Minolta MD 50mm f1.2, Minolta MD 250mm f5.6, Carl Zeiss Sonnar 180mm f2.8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
std
Joined: 09 Feb 2010 Posts: 1826 Location: Bulgaria
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2011 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
std wrote:
I can confirm the Exakta-EOS adapter mounts correctly with N Trioplan, also the mirror clears on both close focus and infinity. _________________ Stefan
My lens list:
SLR MD: Rokkor 1,7/50 Exakta: Kilfitt-Makro-Kilar E 3.5/4cm; CZJ 2/50 Pancolar;M42: CZJ 2.8/50 Tessar; Mir-1B 2.8/37; Jupiter-9 2/85 T-mount: Tamron 5.9/200; Tamron 6.9/300; Tamron 7.5/400 C-mount: Cosmicar 1.8/50 Y/S: Sun 3.5/38-90, Sun 4/70-210 RF Contax RF: Jupiter-8 2/50; Contax G:CZ 2,8/21 Biogon T; CZ 2,8/28 Biogon T; CZ 2/35 Planar T; CZ 2/45 Planar T; CZ 2,8/90 Sonnar T |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|