View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote: |
Do you know whether there was a dedicated hood for this lens? |
There is one, and as Kimble suggested, it is a plastic clip-on design, whose four "claws" fit in that groove outside near the front edge of the lens barrel (and, when mounted, is really quite secure, although likely not as secure as a screw-in metal hood).
I am not certain, but the "official" one might be the SH-551 hood, which happens to be identical (except for markings) to the AT-X 90/2.6 Macro dedicated hood:
I said "might be" because, while I know for certain that the SH-551 hood and the AT-X 90/2.5 hood both fit the 60-120/2.8 just fine, I can't say for sure that the length is exactly right. I do know that these hoods will ~not~ vignette at 60mm FL when mounted on the 60-120/2.8 when it is mounted on an APS-C body, but I can't remember from "Ye olde Film Days of Yore" if they would vignette at 60mm when the lens was mounted on a full-frame 35mm body (?)
I cannot find an exact specified hood model in the Tokina literature I have -- for example, a leaflet I have for this lens specifies "Clip-on Type" for the lens hood, wthout specifying which particular clip-on hood is the dedicated one.
So, while I believe that the SH-551 is the correct hood, I can't say so for certain. _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ?
Last edited by fwcetus on Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:39 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DigiChromeEd
Joined: 29 Dec 2009 Posts: 3462 Location: Northern Ireland
|
Posted: Thu Sep 15, 2016 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
DigiChromeEd wrote:
Thanks Fred. When I saw the pictures of the Tokina hood it reminded me of the clip-on hood on my Minolta MD 4/70-210 and, low and behold, it's a perfect fit. Of course, I don't know if it's the correct length but it looks very similar. _________________ "I've got a Nikon camera, I like to take a photograph" - Paul Simon |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Fri Sep 16, 2016 12:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
fwcetus wrote: |
I am not certain, but the "official" one might be the SH-551 hood, which happens to be identical (except for markings) to the AT-X 90/2.6 Macro dedicated hood: [pix] I said "might be" because, while I know for certain that the SH-551 hood and the AT-X 90/2.5 hood both fit the 60-120/2.8 just fine, I can't say for sure that the length is exactly right. I do know that these hoods will ~not~ vignette at 60mm FL when mounted on the 60-120/2.8 when it is mounted on an APS-C body, but I can't remember from "Ye olde Film Days of Yore" if they would vignette at 60mm when the lens was mounted on a full-frame 35mm body (?). I cannot find an exact specified hood model in the Tokina literature I have -- for example, a leaflet I have for this lens specifies "Clip-on Type" for the lens hood, wthout specifying which particular clip-on hood is the dedicated one. So, while I believe that the SH-551 is the correct hood, I can't say so for certain. |
I should have also mentioned that part of my uncertainty over the hood is because I have had, for some time, three Tokina lenses that all have 55mm filter threads and also those clip-on hood grooves near the front end of each lens that fit the hoods I pictured - the AT-X 60-120/2.8, the AT-X 90/2.5 Macro, and the RMC 100-300/5.6. Now obviously the AT-X 90/2.5 hood is the dedicated hood for the AT-X 90/2.5 Macro lens, but I cannot remember which of the other two lenses (the 60-120/2.8 or the 100-300/5.6) originally came with the SH-551 hood, and is therefore, presumably, the lens that the hood is "dedicated" for.
DigiChromeEd wrote: |
Thanks Fred. When I saw the pictures of the Tokina hood it reminded me of the clip-on hood on my Minolta MD 4/70-210 and, low and behold, it's a perfect fit. Of course, I don't know if it's the correct length but it looks very similar. |
Great! I hope it will work well for you. _________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
fwcetus
Joined: 12 Jun 2015 Posts: 303 Location: New England
|
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2017 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
fwcetus wrote:
DigiChromeEd wrote: |
Do you know whether there was a dedicated hood for this lens? |
fwcetus wrote: |
There is one, and as Kimble suggested, it is a plastic clip-on design, whose four "claws" fit in that groove outside near the front edge of the lens barrel (and, when mounted, is really quite secure, although likely not as secure as a screw-in metal hood).
I am not certain, but the "official" one might be the SH-551 hood, which happens to be identical (except for markings) to the AT-X 90/2.6 Macro dedicated hood: |
OOPS !!! I was incorrect, as it turns out. For the Tokina AT-X 60-120/2.8, the correct dedicated hood turns out to be the SH-553, which is slightly shorter than the SH-551, but otherwise seems to be the same as the SH-551:
However, as I also did say previously, "I do know that [the SH-551 and AT-X 90/2.5 hoods will ~not~ vignette at 60mm FL when mounted on the 60-120/2.8 when it is mounted on an APS-C body". For full frame, I am assuming that the SH-533 should ideally be used.
_________________ Fred
If you saw a fellow drowning, and you could either save him or photograph the event . . . What lens would you use ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|